Ukraine 2014

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

gregb41352
Posts: 224
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:22 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by gregb41352 »

No. The Chinese know that the US will defend Taiwan. No question.
gregb41352
Posts: 224
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:22 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by gregb41352 »

This one: USS Truxton [DDG 103]


One of these, perhaps?
Destroyer Squadron 22
USS Cole [DDG 67]
USS Mahan [DDG 72]
USS McFaul [DDG 74]
USS Mason [DDG 87]
USS Nitze [DDG 94]
USS Truxton [DDG 103]
USS Elrod [FFG 55]

USS Leyte Gulf [CG 55]
USS Philippine Sea [CG 58]
USS Anzio [CG 68]
User avatar
jdkbph
Posts: 255
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: CT, USA

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by jdkbph »

ORIGINAL: gobadgers

No. The Chinese know that the US will defend Taiwan. No question.


Really? I don't think it's necessarily that straight forward at all. If pro-reunification political elements arose within Taiwan (no matter how suspicious it may appear to outsiders) and, with some semblance of popular backing, were able to seize control, what exactly would we be "defending"? How far would we be willing to go in China's back yard?

Depending on the outcome of this Ukrainian thing, it seems to me something like that may actually be easier (for China) to justify than, say, outright annexation of the Spratleys or taking Senkaku Shoto (Diaoyu Islands).

???

JD
JD
User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by NakedWeasel »

ORIGINAL: jdkbph

ORIGINAL: gobadgers

No. The Chinese know that the US will defend Taiwan. No question.


Really? I don't think it's necessarily that straight forward at all. If pro-reunification political elements arose within Taiwan (no matter how suspicious it may appear to outsiders) and, with some semblance of popular backing, were able to seize control, what exactly would we be "defending"? How far would we be willing to go in China's back yard?

Depending on the outcome of this Ukrainian thing, it seems to me something like that may actually be easier (for China) to justify than, say, outright annexation of the Spratleys or taking Senkaku Shoto (Diaoyu Islands).

???

JD


Agreed. Actually, I would not be at all surprised to see the Taiwan issue turn out much like present-day Ukraine. There are definitely elements in Taiwan that would welcome reunification with the mainland, and in this climate of capitulation and non-involvement, especially in the face of real danger of extreme losses, I doubt the American people are going to see much need to involve ourselves on China's doorstep.
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
mikeCK
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:26 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by mikeCK »

The wild card with Taiwan is whether or not South Korea and Japan help out. Everyone is afraid of China over there.
guanotwozero
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:53 am

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by guanotwozero »

Most political sentiment in Taiwan IS pro-unification - just not while the mainland is a communist one-party state. The KMT, who dominated Taiwanese politics for decades, were originally the government of all China but withdrew to Taiwan during the civil war. Thus both Beijing and Taipei claim to house the official government of all China.

Of course the practicality is that they are two self-governing states, but there is still an expectation that they will reunify one day. Taiwan won't agree to that until the mainland has free politics (and maybe the KMT might win an all-China election), while the mainland continues to reject democracy and still intermittently threatens to force unification by military means.

I DO think the US will defend Taiwan if the mainland ever invaded, though at present Beijing just doesn't have sufficient means to do so. If/when reunification happens by mutual agreement, then everyone will be happy.

This contrasts with the current Ukraine crisis, as Ukraine has no allies who'll defend it militarily. The USA or other nations won't risk war with Russia, but likely will enact punitive sanctions if it goes all the way. What's more, Russia will likely become a pariah nation to many, and Ukraine will get sympathy and diplomatic support. Russia may dominate here militarily, but can't win the soft-power war.

The track record of countries successfully grabbing land since WWII is not good; self-determination often wins out in the end, and it's diplomacy, economics and soft power that are the biggest factors.
User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by NakedWeasel »

With American backing, and possibly with the involvement of ANZAC, the Philippines, Vietnam, Singapore, and Thailand, the ROKs and Japan would probably be on board. And the Chinese government would certainly have a reason to fear a force like that. A unified PACRIM could completely deny PLAN shipping any access beyond it's home ports. This is a future scenario I'll probably explore. But I really don't want to digress from this discussion...
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
Figeac
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:07 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by Figeac »

User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by NakedWeasel »



Thanks for the contribution.

Interesting. In the pic on Bloomberg, the F-15C was not carrying any AAW beyond AIM-9s (and probably cannon.) I'm guessing a ferry config? Maybe that jet had just arrived in Lithuania- but wouldn't they have ferried into the AO with at least four AMRAAMs on the conformal hard points?

Anyway. 10 F-15s does not a statement make... [>:]
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
AlmightyTallest
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:00 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by AlmightyTallest »

I would not be surprised if there weren't a few Rapid Raptors in the area.

Google "Rapid Raptor Package" in The Aviationist magazine

I can't post links yet [:(]

Also getting good info on troop movements, attacks etc. using reddit live, search for "Ukrainian Conflict Live Thread" and you'll get a lot more updates on what's going on, tons of journalists and news pouring into the one site will help with campaign building as well perhaps.
User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by NakedWeasel »

ORIGINAL: AlmightyTallest

I would not be surprised if there weren't a few Rapid Raptors in the area.

Google "Rapid Raptor Package" in The Aviationist magazine

I can't post links yet [:(]

Also getting good info on troop movements, attacks etc. using reddit live, search for "Ukrainian Conflict Live Thread" and you'll get a lot more updates on what's going on, tons of journalists and news pouring into the one site will help with campaign building as well perhaps.

I hadnt heard of the F-22 package before- though it seems it's just a smaller, more specialized unit, as opposed to the big, multi-role expeditionary packages the USAF can generate to deal with global threats.

I think that if Raptors were there, EVERYONE would know about it. All it would take is one sighting- and there's A LOT of people watching right now.
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
User avatar
lowchi
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:39 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by lowchi »

ORIGINAL: NakedWeasel


I think that if Raptors were there, EVERYONE would know about it. All it would take is one sighting- and there's A LOT of people watching right now.

i think so too. and dont forget the aircraft spotters

http://www.airliners.net/photo/USA---Ai ... 57e3f61390

Image
User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by NakedWeasel »

Heh, who needs the KGB? (FSB) [:'(]
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
User avatar
beserko
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: The United States Of America

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by beserko »

The fighters are just a "speed bump" like US troops in Korea. If they get hurt we go in (at least that's the theory}
as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns; that is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns—there are things we do not know we don't know."
User avatar
beserko
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: The United States Of America

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by beserko »

Image
as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns; that is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns—there are things we do not know we don't know."
User avatar
beserko
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: The United States Of America

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by beserko »

The U.S. Navy’s newest and most powerful aircraft carrier has docked in Antalya, Turkey—meaning she is within striking distance of Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula. And it appears Russia is deploying anti-ship missiles in response.

USS George H.W. Bush is hauling more than 60 warplanes including no fewer than 40 Hornet and Super Hornet strike-fighters. Bush’s escorting destroyers and cruisers, together packing hundreds of long-range missiles, are presumably nearby. Nuclear attack submarines usually also accompany American flattops on deployment
Image
as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns; that is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns—there are things we do not know we don't know."
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12666
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by Sardaukar »

I wonder if she still has X-47B that was tested on her....
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
gregb41352
Posts: 224
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:22 pm

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by gregb41352 »

Given all the open information available, is anyone working on a scenario for this?
I can only contemplate after the current semester is completed.....May :(
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12666
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by Sardaukar »

Baloogan is.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12666
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Ukraine 2014

Post by Sardaukar »

Some information about north Russia from Finnish sources etc.:

Image

Petsamo: 200th Motorized Infantry Brigade (high readiness) and Marine Brigade. In future, plans to form Arctic warfare Spetnatz Brigade there too.

Alakurtti: just few days ago, Putin announced re-opening the base. At least helicopter regiment is planned there. It already houses Border Guard unit etc.

Petroskoi: 4th Infantry Brigade and MVD (Interior Ministry) Brigade.

Kamenka: 138th Motorized Infantry Brigade.

Luga: SSM Brigade (SS-26 Iskander M, SS-21 Totshka)

Vladimirsky Lager: 4th infantry brigade

Pihkova (Pskov): 76th Airborne Division and Spetznatz Brigade.

All these units are ready to deploy in short time.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”