Making Allied Lemonade-Chickenboy (IJ) vs. SqzMyLemon (AD)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Making Allied Lemonade-Chickenboy (IJ) vs. SqzMyLemon (AD)

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: pontiouspilot

Beware of squeezing those lemons too hard….it's 35 below up here and you will need a hydraulic vice to make any impression at all!

Being as it's Canadian lemons that I seek to compress, you're probably right, pontiouspilot! Thanks for the warning. [;)]
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

December 15-20 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

December 15-20, 1941:

Sorry about the delay in updating. SqzMyLemon is out of town until tomorrow, so this seemed the right time for some updates:

China:

Changsha:

Probing (read: bombardment) Japanese attacks reveal some 16 units and 149,000 troops. Too rich for my blood. I’ve not stolen a march to Changsha. I’ll move around and isolate.

In the NE plains, Changchow, Loyang and Nanyang fall. Chinese take heavy losses and fall back. All sorts of Chinese units will fall back from Changchow and Loyang on the trails to Sian. Nanyang falls quickly and the Chinese occupants fall back on the improved road to Sian. Japanese forces follow and will push up this road and (hopefully) clear it before the Changchow and Loyang rabble can take up blocking stations in the favorable defensive (forested) terrain south of Sian.

In the South, Chinese fall back on Kahnsien, an open hex 2 hexes East of Kukong. A Japanese regiment has entered the city and has the LOS hexside control of the east hexside. A Chinese hoard is falling back from all of South China towards this hex, so this bottleneck will be interesting. To assist the stalwart intrepid Japanese liberators, I’ve ordered most of the LBA in SW and S China to bombard ground units in Kahnsien. Over 5 days these have caused significant casualties and disruption.

In SE China, 3 IJ Division equivalents approach Chusien from the East.

Central, Northeast and Southern China is falling apart fast for the Chinese.

Hong Kong is cleared of Allied mines by numerous AMc and DMS TFs. A number of amphibious capable ships are enroute to pick up the Japanese liberators of Hong Kong for duty elsewhere.

Phillipines:

Luzon: Troops formerly landed at Mauban have entered Manila. There appears to be a small remnant force. They will attack and, likely, take the city tomorrow.

Japanese troops have taken all other significant hexes in N. Luzon and are entering Clark Field. This appears to the be the main defensive hex for the Allied effort.

A number of fighter sweeps over this time frame have bagged some 20 P40s at Clark and / or Manila. He’s standing down the balance of his 18 fighters on Luzon now. We start airfield bombardment of Clark tomorrow.

Between 15-20 December, Allied AOs, TKs, xAK and xAKL ships in Manila harbor initiate loading of fuel from the harbor in an attempt to drain fuel from this hex. Betty aircraft from Formosa or Luzon torpedo and sink them.

Mindanao: Allied units flee Davao towards Cotabato. Japanese landing forces land unopposed at Davao and capture the city. The 16th Naval Guard lands unopposed at Cotabato and cuts off the fleeing Allied troops. Southern Mindanao is under control. Additional base forces, AA and construction units land on Davao.

DEI:

Northern Borneo (Singakawang, Kuching, Miri, Borneo) in Japanese hands. An AirHQ and torpedo device land Singakawang on December 18. Torpedo and bomb-equipped Betty and Nell aircraft sink an xAP at Palembang and numerous small craft in Singapore, Batavia and Medan harbors.

It appears that the vast majority of Allied naval combatants have scampered off. His tiny craft have spread out across the DEI to attract Netty time and attentions. Additional Japanese DD sweeps of these areas have bagged a few more in the last week.

No appreciable Allied air or naval forces are present between Singapore and Batavia. I’ve no intention of letting them gather mass at Palembang.

The Japanese will gather 2 armored recon ‘regiments’, two infantry regiments and several smaller SNLF units at Singakawang to effect a coup de main against Palembang. Forces should be assembled within 4 days. I’d like to have the oil center in hand by the new year.

Japanese DMS and AMc units are ordered to sweep Medan, Oosthaven and Palembang hexes for mines in preparation to Japanese landing forces’ arrival.

Malaya:

Alor Star falls on December 19. Allied resitance crumbles and a retreat ensues.

I made a mistake that will cost me some three days time here. Instead of leaving an occupying Japanese unit on the rail hex below Alor Star, I moved it instead south. Oops. The hexside permitted Allied retreat from Alor Star. Now it’s got to be cleared before I can rail transport in the vast majority of my striking power to Taiping and parts South.
Once I can rail in to Taiping and / or Kuala Lumpur, the isolation of Singapore will be effected quickly.

Mersing is being evacuated by the Allies, leaving a tempting landing spot there. It’s worth consideration to redirect an infantry regiment to cut across the Allied LOS at the lower end of the peninsula. I’ll consider this…

Pacific:

Lae, Kavieng, Shortlands, Tulagi, Luganville, Funafuti, Baker and Canton islands fall to amphibious assault.

Allied defenders at Lae are pushed into the jungle. At Kavieng, they are pursued south down the trail. They’ll be pursued and exterminated.

The Japanese 4th infantry division arrives at Truk and will unload. They are prepping for Port Moresby, which they will combat load for shortly.

The Japanese 144th infantry regiment and 15th Base force land at Rabaul intact. There are still sizeable Allied assets (the entirety of the Lark Force and 2x Base Forces) at Rabaul. There has been little effort to extricate them, apparently. Frankly I'm surprised. While the 144th could probably manage on its own, I order reinforcement with the Maizuru SNLF unit formerly at Lae. The two of them should suffice.

Elsewhere in the Pacific, an Allied CM is torpedoed just off of Christmas island. Glen recon on December 20th shows five xAKs present there-a probable reinforcement effort from Pearl.

KB (- Kaga) plus 2 x heavy SCTFs and oiler support refuel at Ocean Island. All SNLFs (- Maizuru SNLF @ Rabaul) in the SoPac will rendezvous at Funafuti, refuel and head to Christmas island en masse. They’ll be supported by KB and the heavy SCTFs. I’ve decided to liquidate whatever he’s put there and put a delaying force on shore.
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: December 15-20 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

Malaya December 20, 1941:

Image
Attachments
Malaya12.20.41.jpg
Malaya12.20.41.jpg (199.33 KiB) Viewed 324 times
Image
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: December 15-20 1941 update

Post by zuluhour »

definitely feels like injun country in here![:D]
User avatar
Hanzberger
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:16 pm
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Contact:

RE: December 15-20 1941 update

Post by Hanzberger »

I'm surprised he is letting you build up Singkawang so easily. My game against the AI seems harder then yours. Bombers have sunk a half dozen ships there. I think some allied players give up on Malaya to easy. As far as bombing Singers, the AI still has a sizable Air Force there which I have to wittle down. He should have put up a better fight here.
Playing Scen 2 vs Ai currently

Japan AC wire chart here
tm.asp?m=2769286&mpage=1&key=?
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: December 15-20 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

He's avoiding combat across the board. With the exception of the two ill-fated PA ID attacks on Luzon, he's not attempted any meaningful counteroffensive or spoiling attack. He's fully committed to bugging out as much as he possibly can.

I wouldn't mind a more aggressive Dutch / British defense at Singakawang, as it gives me an opportunity to whittle their striking power down before the landings on Java proper.

So I'm taking advantage of the lull in resistance. If he doesn't want to fight for the DEI, I'll just take it unopposed.

Update to follow later today, December 21-25, inclusive.
Image
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: December 15-20 1941 update

Post by obvert »

The best place for the Allies to strike is in the Java Sea, so he may just be reorganizing and getting some nice surprises ready.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Sabre21
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 8:00 am
Location: on a mountain in Idaho

RE: December 15-20 1941 update

Post by Sabre21 »

I've recently started to play AE as a Japanese. I've had the game since it came out and played the original quite a bit against the AI but never really got into this version until a couple weeks ago.

I'm interested in what HR's you might be using, I never saw any posted.

Also your opening move is interesting. In the original, I would use KB minus Kaga to hit PH and then hit Manila harbor with everything I could scrape together. Killing off all those subs to me was a priority. Too often I would lose a key ship here and there to those pesky little pig boats, so taking them out early to me was important. I was wondering after going thru a half dozen AAR's if anyone else hit Manila like that. I don't play for points though as I do to see if I can do better than what the Japanese did. Looks like you are off to one heck of a start.
Image
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: December 15-20 1941 update

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Sabre21

I've recently started to play AE as a Japanese. I've had the game since it came out and played the original quite a bit against the AI but never really got into this version until a couple weeks ago.

I'm interested in what HR's you might be using, I never saw any posted.

Also your opening move is interesting. In the original, I would use KB minus Kaga to hit PH and then hit Manila harbor with everything I could scrape together. Killing off all those subs to me was a priority. Too often I would lose a key ship here and there to those pesky little pig boats, so taking them out early to me was important. I was wondering after going thru a half dozen AAR's if anyone else hit Manila like that. I don't play for points though as I do to see if I can do better than what the Japanese did. Looks like you are off to one heck of a start.

I started with the same mentality. Hitting Manila was with just LBA for me, which scratched the surface. A CV would help, but some subs will get out. It's really not as much of a problem as you think to have those subs around, as most (other than the S-Boats) don't have working torps until 43.

About the points. We started the game not playing for points, but it does change your view to use the points as a guideline at least. It's difficult to balance what you're doing with the larger perspective if you're not playing for points.

I'm curious here about the HRs as well. Andre?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: December 15-20 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Sabre21
I'm interested in what HR's you might be using, I never saw any posted.

Hi Sabre21,

Thanks for posting. My HRs were available 'on demand'. I'd like to avoid the dogmatic argument about whether or not HRs are or are not required for PBEM. These are the ones that we feel need to be addressed with some thoughtful (and minimal) HRs:

• No singleton civilian ships (xAKL, xAK, etc.) scouts. Singleton military crewed ships (AMc, PB, PC, DD, etc.) can be sent to their doom, but never with the intent of ‘soaking up’ aircraft sorties or SCTF ammo in preparation to a battle. If a scout gets greased on a dangerous mission, that’s one thing. Saturating the waters around the source of an upcoming major naval battle with singleton PBs, xAKLs or other ‘noise’ is something different.

• Fighter and bomber sorties should be kept below 25,000 feet elevation to avoid ‘stratospheric sweep’ issues. Reconnaisance aircraft are an exception. Try to keep within the second highest manuever band as best possible too.

• Player must pay the full ‘retail’ price in PP for moving a unit out of its designated (restricted) theatre. Exceptions: RTA units may act within 3 hexes of the Thai border. Indian troops may also operate within three hexes of their border without paying the PP price for operating in the Burmese theatre.

• Night bombing (of airfields, LCUs, strategic installations) is still borked. Night bombings should be limited to small (<24) sized units per theatre and limited to nights with >50% moonlight. After June 1944, all restrictions on night bombing are lifted.

• Re: Strategic bombing for the Allies. The 'curtain coming up' January 1, 1943 sounds and feels about right. I think it's too much for the Japanese to strat bomb in China-period.

My opponent desired an HR on port strikes for Allied 4E and 2E bombing at low altitudes, which I agreed with the following caveat: "I must say that I've never seen the overpowered nature of low level 4E bombing on ports, but I'll take your word for it. If it's an issue for you, then I'm OK HR'ing it."

We also discussed apriori philosophical approaches to certain stock scenario 2 "issues". Here's the relevant portions of these discussions:

1. What are your thoughts on the "Fortress Palembang"? My opinion is that it's an annoying code issue that allows an Allied fortress to be constructed on the Palembang oil refineries. I have sandboxed landing a division and a half on Java and Sumatra on turn one. It can be done, but I think that gamey as hell. My usual gentleman's agreement is that if you foreswear the Fortress Palembang, I will remain reasonable with my first turn movement bonus. Sound fair?

As I think the "Mersing gambit" is a bit nuts on turn one, you have my assurances that I will not be doing that.

2. You may move any TF already at sea on turn one. You may not sail other TFs before turn one. You may not form TFs before the end of turn one. Exception: I believe that POW and Repulse are ahistorically tasked with a December 7 trip to interdict the Japanese landings on the Malay peninsula. You may move this TF and cancel these orders if you wish. I don't insist on the death ride.

It's the matter of Force Z. If you just hit 'end turn' on December 7, they'll ride to oblivion on December 8. I've indicated that I don't require you to do that and that they can, because of the ahistorically timed final charge (they didn't sail until 12/10 IIRC), you may reorder their movement and intervene, sending them elsewhere if you should desire.

I ask this in return for your hand in moving them on turn one: tell me if you will conduct their default charge to Khota Bharu. In exchange for sparing their lives on December 8, I would ask some freedom for my Nells, Betties and surface forces that were so arranged to fend them off. I've got some other things planned for their first turn if they won't be needed to deal with Force Z.

I also will commit to-in addition to not hunting your carriers on turn one-not hunting Houston or Boise on turn one. But that requires you to not reorder them from their turn one default orders too. Since they're both in their own formed TFs (only Boise has movement orders though), my ability to carry out this pledge does rely on you not changing their orders.

3. Any LCUs or air stationed in China per se may be ordered to move, attack or provide local CAP. Please don't transfer aircraft in or out of China on turn one.


Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: December 15-20 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: obvert
We started the game not playing for points, but it does change your view to use the points as a guideline at least. It's difficult to balance what you're doing with the larger perspective if you're not playing for points.

I agree. That's my POV re: points as well. If I'm ahead 4.5:1 in points and approaching autovictory, that's the game's way of telling me I'm doing something 'right' and 'better than historical' performance for the IJ. It's really the only objective measure of performance, IMO. Everything else can be 'spun' for political expediency.

Sure, you may have captured / recaptured that meaningless atoll (and gained 3 VPs), but you lost 2 BBs + escorts for some 800 points? IRL you'd be court martialed and rolled out of the service and / or shot. No way to 'spin' that into a positive if you let the points speak for themselves.
Image
User avatar
Sabre21
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 8:00 am
Location: on a mountain in Idaho

RE: December 15-20 1941 update

Post by Sabre21 »

The way I look at HR's is that they are specified rules between 2 players on how they want to conduct the game. What business is it of mine to try and tell someone else how they should play their game.

A friend and I have been playing various board/computer games over the last 5 years and I recently got him to pick up AE. We've done the Coral Sea game and will start Guadalcanal today as a warm-up drill to the campaign with me as the Japs.

Him and I both don't get into doing gamey things to try and take advantage of each other so as long as we are aware of engine issues that would limit certain tactics such as the night bombing or single ship recon, we are good to go.
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: December 20-25 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

Long overdue update:

China:

A confused hodge podge. I'll post a screenshot in the next couple days. Mostly manuevering and some open field combat / aerial bombardment. The 'purse' in the central plains has snapped closed around a number of Chinese units still in the area. They'll be squeezed down to paste.

The two Southern routes to Sian see a rabble of retreating Chinese forces, followed closely by a Japanese horde.

Phillipines:

Luzon sees significant IJ reinforcement over the last 4 days. The 38th ID and extensive artillery support arrive at Iba on 12.26. At Mauban, the 21st ID unloads. The 48 Division reforms at Clark from its component parts. At Manila, the 16th Division will reform, after the sole fractional element (Miuban detachment) is transported up from Davao, Mindanao.

All four of these divisions are prepping for Clark Field. If he would be so kind as to back up to the Bataan peninsula, I'd happily let him starve to death there. Then I could repurpose 2 of these Divisions for Timor or (possibly) N. Australia before mid-January.

All remaining Allied ships scramble from Manila the day after it falls. In a series of running gun battles, PT-32 survives enough small TB and PC combatants to hit a CL at close range. Eventually PT-32 is dispatched by IJ destroyers.

Two American AS ships (Canopus and another) play a rousing game of hide-n-seek around some of the N. Phillipines minor islands for a day or so until they're found and sunk by Japanese TFs. December 25 sees the last of the Allied shipping in the Phillipines dispatched.



Image
Attachments
Phillipines12.25.41.jpg
Phillipines12.25.41.jpg (389.66 KiB) Viewed 324 times
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: December 20-25 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

Pacific:

Truk: The 4th ID and naval support units unload at Truk. The 4th will be combat loaded and sent to Port Moresby shortly. Slated to arrive there shortly after the new year.

Rabaul falls to combined attack of the 144th infantry regiment and the Maizuru SNLF. Both units immediately begin preparing for Wake island. Support units, particularly engineer and aviation support will arrive tomorrow to build this bastion.

The Allied defenders are thrown into the malarial wastes of New Georgia island and begin tracking for Gasmata on the SW shoreline. Bad news guys-you won't make it.

Guam: A SNLF company and two combat engineer companies (from Babeldoab) land on Guam on 12.24. The small Allied base force crumbles and the Japansese seize the island on Christmas day. Happy Christmas, Yankee dogs!

Canton-Christmas island: KB, supported by two heavy SCTFs plus a number of SNLF companies will assemble in the Canton-Christmas area, refuel and move toward the Christmas island target. Landing within 7 days.
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: December 20-25 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

Burma:

Moulmein falls to the 2nd RTA Division on 12.25. The Japanese 33rd Division is en route from Bangkok via Pinsalouk and overland trail movement. Other RTA units and base forces (and area HQs) to arrive Moulmein in a few days.


DEI / Malaya:

Lots of action on the Malay peninsula. The offending Indian brigade blocking movement from Alor Star to Taiping is destroyed. The roadway is clear now and large numbers of reinforcements rail into Taiping on 12.25.

To the South, armored recon pushes along the West road towards Kuala Lumpur. It would be more efficient to rail everyone there instead of starting road movement at Taiping. Alas, it appears as though he's holding with at least a modest force at KL. My recon regiment may be insufficient for force the hex and clear the rail.

So, to borrow a phrase from Teddy Roosevelt Jr. (of Utah Beach fame), "We'll start the war from right here." It will be a longer walk for us, but the Singapore defenders aren't going anywhere.

Mersing: A spur-of-the-moment landing here goes well for the armored recon regiment and engineer unit landed there. On 12.26.41, the peninusula is bisected by the movement of the armored regiment to the West coast of the Malay peninsula. Any Allied unit North of here is denied rail movement into Singapore now. Some 7,000-10,000 Allied troops that shoula-woulda-coulda pulled back will be destroyed in situ north of this point.

Daily bombardment of the Singapore airfield continues, alternated by occasional port bombardment to encourage the departure of ships. The damaged airfield will ensure that additional fortifications are unbuilt from this point forth.

My experience with the Malay campaign is that it is slow to start, but-once Mersing (or KL) is captured, proceeds very quickly. I anticipate knocking on Singapore's doors by the second week of January. Still, recon shows some 61,000 Allied troops on Singapore. This will require some time to digest such a force.

Borneo: mini-KB and a heavy SCTF with Kongo refuels from Singakawang (a replenishment TF arrived on 12.23). Because of the ample supply and AirHQ at Singakawang, mini-KB also upgrades its aircraft and 'resizes' the airgroups to fit the carrier. This is great in the long run, but a minor inconvenience for the next couple of days, as the new planes need to be readied for use.

Sumatra: What started as a trickle on 12.21 has turned into a flood of Japanese troops. Over the past three days, troops have poured into Sumatra from Borneo and direct from Saigon or CRB. By 12.26, some 30,000 Japanese troops (900 AV) are ashore at Palembang, largely unmolested en route. Half a dozen xAK or xAPs are shot up by Dutch 75mm shore defenses after discharging their troops and materiel, all but one should survive.

Three Dutch DDs attempted to interfere in the liberation of Sumatra, manuevering into the "stream" of Japanese TFs from Borneo to Sumatra. Kongo dispatched one during a daylight fight. Another was damaged by light Japanese Cl/DD SCTF and withdrew. The third was sunk by Japanese submarine as it escorted the damaged DD from the area.

I took the precaution of re-routing several of the amphibious TFs slightly to the North (waypoints NE of Palembang) to help cordon off undetected Allied SCTF approaches from the South.

Two Japanese AMc and a DMS were destroyed by Allied shore gunfire whilest clearing mines at Palembang or Merak (Java). An inadvised transit through Merak (automatic return to base for refueling from the IO side of Java) results in I-154 being mined at Merak and sunk.

Tarakan: A special note about Tarakan is due. On (approximately) 12.18, an SNLF group (60AV) attempted to extricate the Allied defenders here. That was insufficient. A reinforcement SNLF group was sent in. Unwisely, this was not escorted by surface combatants.

My opponent did a great job of slipping a Dutch Cl into the TF, shredding it. Some 2500 troops went into the drink. A terrible job of force protection. [:-]

Still, a remnant of the second force got ashore along with a small IJNAF company. Several shock attacks later have disrupted both Allied and Japanese forces, but failed to extricate the defenders. The Dutch should be proud of their defense here. This will have to be dealt with in time-probably by repurposing troops from Mindanao here.

Much of the southern DEI is on hold for the time being. In my effort to gain a lodgement on Sumatra (and Java?) before the end of the year, I'm putting all available forces ashore to the North. Besides this is where my best force protection (i.e. LBA) is based in force. Balikpapan and Timor will be engaged soon, I hope, possibly by a redundant division on Luzon.

Java: Opinions? Palembang will fall on 12.27. The meagre Allied forces there won't stand up to even the first assault ("deliberate" so as not to damage the oil fields any more than necessary), I'm certain.

My next goal is to gain lodgement on Java as soon as possible. I will clear Oosthaven and sweep it of mines. Palembang and Oosthaven will become major "jump off" and support sites for the invasion of Java.

I'm just debating whether to focus on Merak or Kalidjati. The former is closer to Palembang and Oosthaven, possibly allowing a surprise landing overnight. Merak is also one hex distant from Batavia and will be, I'm certain, patrolled by annoying and disruptive surface forces.

Kalidjati is a clear hex on the Java Sea side of things. It's a few hexes from both Batavia and Soerbaja and could provide a lodgement in the middle of the island. Furthermore, troops from Kalidjati could bisect the island within a couple days, eliminating rail reinforcement or retreat from either locale. Kalidjati is also longer range "just" in reach of LBA out of Oosthaven.

What are your pros or cons?

DEI map:



Image
Attachments
Sumatra12.25.41.jpg
Sumatra12.25.41.jpg (188.13 KiB) Viewed 324 times
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: December 20-25 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

A real mess in China:



Image
Attachments
Chineseme..12.25.41.jpg
Chineseme..12.25.41.jpg (764.31 KiB) Viewed 324 times
Image
User avatar
Cribtop
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:42 pm
Location: Lone Star Nation

RE: December 20-25 1941 update

Post by Cribtop »

I took Kalidjati by air assault on D -1. This allows you to fly in LBA fighters on D-Day. They cover the landings without air support for one day and you make sure an air support unit unloads with the first wave to provide support after that. Handy to help the CV air fend off air attack. Of course, the whole thing won't work if the base is garrisoned, but it often isn't. Merak IMHO has much higher risk of air and naval interdiction. Plus, Kalidjati usually isn't mined. Either can work, but I think Kalidjati is the easier nut to crack. Finally, it's easier to cut the island in two and divide enemy resistance from Kalidjati.
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: December 20-25 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Cribtop

I took Kalidjati by air assault on D -1. This allows you to fly in LBA fighters on D-Day. They cover the landings without air support for one day and you make sure an air support unit unloads with the first wave to provide support after that. Handy to help the CV air fend off air attack. Of course, the whole thing won't work if the base is garrisoned, but it often isn't. Merak IMHO has much higher risk of air and naval interdiction. Plus, Kalidjati usually isn't mined. Either can work, but I think Kalidjati is the easier nut to crack. Finally, it's easier to cut the island in two and divide enemy resistance from Kalidjati.

Good thinking, fellow Texan (I'll be one-again-in a matter of a few months). [8D]

I've the 2 SNLF para units coming and the air assault unit (para) organizing in Bangkok. It will be worthwhile getting them into theatre. Air recon will tell the tale of expected resistance.
Image
User avatar
Cribtop
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:42 pm
Location: Lone Star Nation

RE: December 20-25 1941 update

Post by Cribtop »

Cool - welcome back to Texas!
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

December 26-27 1941 update

Post by Chickenboy »

December 26-27, 1941:

DEI:

Palembang: Troops continue to unload the night of December 25-26. Shore battery fire continues and, if anything, is a bit more intense than nights past. Half a dozen transports are damaged and 2 xAKLs sunk after unloading their cargoes. A embedded Cl would have saved some yard time for a number of these guys. [:-]

Palembang falls to deliberate assault on December 26. Defending Dutch troops take heavy losses and fall back across the river to the South.

I am relieved to find comparatively mild-modest oil and refinery damage in the morning. We can certainly live with that. [:)]

A recon armored unit is tasked with clearing Djambi to the north. Base forces will remain behind for air support. The balance of the assault forces move out to the SW towards the evicted rabble and, eventually, Oosthaven.

Fighter, DB and recon units are transferred to Palembang's surprisingly undamaged aerodrome. AMc and DMS TFs continue their work to clear Palembang's approaches. Support AD, AS and AV ships leave Singkawang to rebase at Palembang. Small SCTFs are ordered to refuel at Soerbaja in preparation for the next round of their liberation of Java-that should begin early in the New Year.

Ground combat at Palembang (48,91)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 23637 troops, 210 guns, 106 vehicles, Assault Value = 843

Defending force 3107 troops, 29 guns, 6 vehicles, Assault Value = 94

Japanese adjusted assault: 543

Allied adjusted defense: 22

Japanese assault odds: 24 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Palembang !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
363 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 29 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
2004 casualties reported
Squads: 70 destroyed, 20 disabled
Non Combat: 49 destroyed, 35 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 29 (22 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Vehicles lost 6 (6 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 4


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
6th Tank Regiment
124th Infantry Regiment
4th Infantry Regiment
24th Infantry Regiment
16th Infantry Regiment
148th Infantry Regiment
Sasebo 3rd SNLF
Sasebo 8th SNLF
1st Fleet
39th Road Const Co
97th JAAF AF Bn
10th JAAF AF Coy
16th AA Regiment
31st Fld AA Gun Co
44th Field AA Battalion
6th JAAF AF Coy
3rd JAAF AF Coy
30th Fld AA Gun Co
23rd JAAF AF Bn
14th Shipping Engineer Regiment
2nd Field Artillery Regiment
47th Field AA Battalion
2nd Recon Rgt /3

Defending units:
Zuid KNIL Battalion
So.Sumatra Garrison Battalion
Palembang Base Force
224 Group RAF /1




Image
Attachments
Palembang..12.27.41.jpg
Palembang..12.27.41.jpg (166.68 KiB) Viewed 324 times
Image
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”