F-35 vs triple-digit SAMs - weaponeering?

[Dimitris]

Added in Build 509; Weapons nominally suitable only against fixed targets can also attack stationary mobile targets.

[Grackle]

I am very impressed at how swiftly you respond to customer feedback and how it is such a refreshing change from the support for previous modern naval/air simulations. This is an important new capability that will make this simulation even more formidable.

Thanks for your ceaseless efforts,

Mark

[LordFlashheart]

Added in Build 509; Weapons nominally suitable only against fixed targets can also attack stationary mobile targets.

Whoa! Talk about fast work! (I'm still not convinced there are humans behind this instead there is some Borg-type AI constantly updating things in real-time...)

Thanks so much for the outstanding customer support![&o]

NB: If I understand correctly - the ability to target stationary mobile targets with some (non-preplanned) weapons still means that a devious scenario designer could set a mobile SAM/AAA system to trundle along waypoints to frustrate any SEAD attempts...?

[Dimitris]

ORIGINAL: LordFlashheart
NB: If I understand correctly - the ability to target stationary mobile targets with some (non-preplanned) weapons still means that a devious scenario designer could set a mobile SAM/AAA system to trundle along waypoints to frustrate any SEAD attempts...?

Yes. It will not, however, take the proper (realistic) time to strike-down/deploy for operation and pack up and leave again. This is something we definitely want to improve but requires some significant data research.

[LordFlashheart]

Excellent. That means we could simulate 1991 Iraq AD-style takedowns as well as 1999 Serbian Op Allied Force - by using different mixes of mobile/static SAMs

CMANO just keeps getting better and better...!