::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Some of those arriving Hurricane pilots are simply horrendous. Definitely check them out first.

Good thing you fled Burma, or are fleeing Burma.[:)]


Yeah, a forward defense of Burma would have been a bad choice. He's going to have a lot of irons in the fire soon, it seems, and the small Chinese divs moving to India could potentially cause some problems if they can get there, but also might just get trapped and destroyed. I have to think hard before sending units through the jungle to Ledo now. I might just want to leave them all on the border areas, dug in. Supply will be the issue though.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
SHE MADE IT TO PORT!!!!

Looks like a month to clear minor damage. Here is the shot.

Whew! From the increases in system and engine damage, she was losing the battle to stay afloat.

The fires sent her up to 79 (65) before they were out, then it's been going down slowly, so the damage control team was working well! [:)]
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

I see you are enjoying the Japanese subs from an allied perspective! [;)]

Still following along but mostly reading on my phone. For some reason I can no longer log into the forums from it so I can write anything!

PS. Any initial thought on PDU OFF/SL yet? I found SLs to make China extremely problematic from an allied perspective and supply loss due to unwanted overstacking caused by retreats.

Yeah, wow. I don't think my subs in our game were this good so early. Makes me shiver for later.

So far it's been a challenge to figure out the best way to utilize the SL to my advantage in China. They've worked well in certain spots to keep the IJA from getting massive stacks and blowing through, but also I realize for the Chinese you have to be very careful about which units are in a contested hex. Some have a bunch of dead weight of disabled squads to start while others are small for their AV punch.

I haven't had too many retreats yet, one big one, but got a few very good results from other spots.

It's still very early, and I could be cursing a lot more in a few months, but so far the IJA hasn't just steamrolled which is good. At least the pace in China is slower.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

[font="Times New Roman"]Jan 18, 1942[/font]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]SUBS: [/font]Sending the two RN subs to defend India! It's all that is there and can challenge the IJN fleet at all right now. Pretty sad.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]INDIA:[/font] The first landing is at ... Akyab!!?? Interesting. Is this just a move to counter my early occupation of the Arakan and kill those two brigades defending it? maybe, but there is still a large fleet now between Diamond Harbour and Chittagong, but moving toward DH. i put string bags on for one hex from Calcutta in case he does land there. The rollover shows only 19 fighters and 12 bombers? Maybe it's only the Kaga? If that is the case some damage could be done. There are about 60 fighters in Calcutta now.

Since there was no landing at Chittagong I cancelled move orders for the fleeing units and will stand for now. It's looking less like an all-in move and more like a trapping move. We'll see. Getting interesting!

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]Pacific: [/font]The Aikoku Maru was tracked down by CA Louisville and sunk. A DD took a good shot and will need yard time. Sending them to Christmas Island on the way to Pearl. The Penrhyn port is building at 5% a day. Nice and slow. An engineer unit will arrive in about 5-6 days to speed up the process. I'm confident in being able to protect the island from any attacks with all of the IJN in various parts of the IO, but it's the passage to somewhere with a dry dock that worries me. Maybe the repair of minor damage will also get speed up to 2-3 hexes a day, and that could make Pearl an option even. A few special air groups have been training ASW and they will be brought to the area, plus all of the PC and KV I can get my hands on.

The good thing about all of this focus on the southern hemisphere is that the No Pac plan is moving right along. Adak will have a field in 1-2 days, Akutan is halfway there, and lots of support troops have staged to Dutch and Kodiak ready to move in.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]CHINA: [/font] He's definitely building for a large scale move into the Sian area. About 15 units grouped on the plain now. I'm scrambling everything around to get to good defensive spots and dig. Moving back from the SE front to within one hex of Sian and also getting some into the +3 behind the city. Also, with this India incursion the B-17s have been called back to India. I'm also going to send a few more groups to Cape Town.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]DEI:[/font] The Cocos experiment fails as a massive bombardment and invasion takes the base. I have to hand it to Nic here as he saw the potential and moved very quickly to counter it. All units there would have been destroyed anyway, so no great loss, but they could have possibly gone to OZ as well and been saved. A few are still only fragments and the rest will be sent to Koepang and saved as well. In all a loss of about 120 PPs and around 5-7 transport planes lost in ops over what would have been the result with out sending them to Cocos. The Japanese units will be out for a time as well recouping after the atoll landing. Worth a try!

[font="Trebuchet MS"]--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR January 18, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Legaspi at 82,82, Range 4,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
PB Showa Maru #3
PB Showa Maru #5, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
xAK Meigen Maru, Shell hits 2

Allied Ships
PT-20
PT-21
PT-22
PT-23
PT-24
PT-25
PT-26
PT-27
PT-28, Shell hits 1
PT-29
PT-30
PT-36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Time Surface Combat, near Starbuck Island at 171,152, Range 23,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
AMC Aikoku Maru, Shell hits 22, heavy fires, heavy damage

Allied Ships
CA Louisville, Shell hits 1
DD Anderson
DD Clark, Shell hits 1, on fire

Maximum visibility in Partly Cloudy Conditions: 28,000 yards
Range closes to 23,000 yards...
CONTACT: Japanese lookouts spot Allied task force at 23,000 yards
CONTACT: Allied lookouts spot Japanese task force at 23,000 yards
CA Louisville engages AMC Aikoku Maru at 23,000 yards

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Cocos Islands (33,101)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 9928 troops, 84 guns, 11 vehicles, Assault Value = 273

Defending force 5234 troops, 43 guns, 26 vehicles, Assault Value = 53

Japanese adjusted assault: 144

Allied adjusted defense: 9

Japanese assault odds: 16 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Cocos Islands !!!

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
PBY-4 Catalina: 1 destroyed

Combat modifiers
Defender: disruption(-), preparation(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
1468 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 158 disabled

Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Guns lost 16 (1 destroyed, 15 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
2868 casualties reported
Squads: 81 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 319 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 61 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 56 (56 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 29 (29 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 13


Assaulting units:
4th Ind.Mixed Regiment
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
91st Naval Guard Unit

Defending units:
28th Gurkha Brigade
6th Indian Brigade
2nd Argylls Battalion
Sarawak Force /1
109th RAF Adv Base Force
1st Port Maint Engineer Battalion
110th RAF Adv Base Force
Nichols Field AAF Base Force
2nd ISF Base Force
113th RAF Adv Base Force
Del Monte AAF Base Force
111th RAF Adv Base Force
223 Group RAF /2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Akyab (54,45)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2601 troops, 14 guns, 1 vehicles, Assault Value = 85

Defending force 8318 troops, 105 guns, 84 vehicles, Assault Value = 288

Assaulting units:
48th Gurkha Brigade

Defending units:
55th Cavalry Regiment
112th Infantry Rgt /7
55th Engr Rgt /4
143rd Infantry Rgt /6
55th Mountain Gun Regiment
21st Medium Field Artillery Battalion
4th JAAF Base Force
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[/font]

Ships Sunk: Nice to see the DDs coming on the list the last few days from earlier battles.

[font="Trebuchet MS"]DD Arashio is reported to have been sunk near Soc Trang on Dec 09, 1941
PB Showa Maru #5 is reported to have been sunk near Legaspi on Jan 18, 1942
AMC Aikoku Maru is reported to have been sunk near Starbuck Island on Jan 18, 1942
[/font]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Image
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

[font="Trebuchet MS"]Lots of ships still here doing something. What will it be?[/font]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attachments
Screenshot..09.01.27.jpg
Screenshot..09.01.27.jpg (926.95 KiB) Viewed 206 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by Lokasenna »

I'd even look at moving Yorktown somewhere that he doesn't know about once the minor float is knocked off. Forget getting any system off. You either move her soon, or wait a long time such that he thinks he missed her there. If you wait a long time, you risk getting sniffed out by aerial recon. I'd move her sooner. With 15 Sys, that's not so bad. I'd make a short hop to somewhere else to knock off a few more points, perhaps Tahiti, and then move for a shipyard. If you wait too long, I think you risk more subs getting into place and catching her on the way out. You could try using Sara to escort her, with every plane turned on to ASW.

PS - can you get the planes off at Penrhyn?
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

[font="Times New Roman"]Jan 19, 1942[/font]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]INDIA: [/font]So, a landing did go in at Diamond Harbour!!! No bobmardment so I'll have to go by troops lost in the surf for a list of units. Looks like 3 divisions moderately well supported. Not close to enough to challenge Calcutta, so I'm sure more is on the way. I don't see paras, which is good. I've been putting small units on the route to Chittagong but haven't had enough yet to get the many nodes on the lore half of India. Should still be able to rail troops into Bengal if calcutta comes under siege. For every division I can get there he'll need at least two more to try to take it. I'll have a strong Aussie division in two weeks and that will definitely help. I'd guess the heavy radio traffic at Singers this turn is more headed this way. Colombo? Cochin?

[font="Trebuchet MS"]15 Support troops lost in surf during unload of 5th Div /15
15 Support troops lost overboard during unload of 38th Div /6
15 Support troops accidentally lost during unload of 33rd Div /5


81mm Mortar accidentally lost during unload of 2nd Mortar Bn
Motorized Support lost overboard during unload of 3rd Medium FA Rgt
10cm T92 Gun dropped into water during unload of 18th Medium FA Rgt

75mm/40 T88 AA damaged beyond repair during unload of 47th Fld AA Bn
15 Support troops lost overboard during unload of 6th Field Const Bn
15 Support troops lost in surf during unload of 51st Fld AA Bn
Motorized Support lost in surf during unload of 40th Fld AA Bn[/font]

Akyab goes down and I'll try to hold against the force that took it at Chittagong unless more drops in.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]PI:[/font] Another IJA DA gets a 1:2 with lots of casualties. The forts remained at 2 also, which is nice. They're nearing three now.

[font="Trebuchet MS"]--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR January 1, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Clark Field (79,76)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 32723 troops, 365 guns, 247 vehicles, Assault Value = 961

Defending force 25473 troops, 299 guns, 195 vehicles, Assault Value = 686

Japanese adjusted assault: 504

Allied adjusted defense: 1507

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1283 casualties reported
Squads: 6 destroyed, 120 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 24 disabled
Guns lost 19 (2 destroyed, 17 disabled)
Vehicles lost 14 (2 destroyed, 12 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
696 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 50 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 32 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Vehicles lost 15 (2 destroyed, 13 disabled)

Assaulting units:
48th Division
16th Division
4th Tank Regiment
3rd Ind Engineer Regiment
Kure 1st SNLF
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
14th Army
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion

Defending units:
4th Marine Regiment
194th Tank Battalion
31st PA Infantry Division
14th PS Engineer Regiment
45th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
2nd PA Constabulary Division
201st PA Construction Battalion
21st PA Infantry Division
I Philippine Corps
301st Construction Battalion
202nd PA Construction Battalion
Clark Field AAF Base Force
Far East USAAF
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
1st PI Base Force
803rd Aviation Engineer Battalion
88th PS Field Artillery Regiment
301st PA Field Artillery Regiment


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Akyab (54,45)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 6541 troops, 93 guns, 9 vehicles, Assault Value = 287

Defending force 2559 troops, 14 guns, 1 vehicles, Assault Value = 82

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 218

Allied adjusted defense: 19

Japanese assault odds: 11 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Akyab !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), preparation(-), fatigue(-)
experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
315 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 31 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Allied ground losses:
892 casualties reported
Squads: 31 destroyed, 34 disabled
Non Combat: 21 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 11 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 6 (4 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Vehicles lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
55th Cavalry Regiment
112th Infantry Rgt /7
55th Engineer Regiment
143rd Infantry Rgt /6
21st Medium Field Artillery Battalion
55th Mountain Gun Regiment
4th JAAF Base Force

Defending units:
48th Gurkha Brigade

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[/font]

Losses:

[font="Trebuchet MS"]Loss of AVP Merel on Jan 19, 1942 is admitted[/font]

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Image
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

[font="Trebuchet MS"]Here is what we have to play with so far. Good for a week or so, but if he lands another 5-6 divisions ... ?[/font]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachments
Screenshot...02.56_1.jpg
Screenshot...02.56_1.jpg (967.63 KiB) Viewed 206 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

I'd even look at moving Yorktown somewhere that he doesn't know about once the minor float is knocked off. Forget getting any system off. You either move her soon, or wait a long time such that he thinks he missed her there. If you wait a long time, you risk getting sniffed out by aerial recon. I'd move her sooner. With 15 Sys, that's not so bad. I'd make a short hop to somewhere else to knock off a few more points, perhaps Tahiti, and then move for a shipyard. If you wait too long, I think you risk more subs getting into place and catching her on the way out. You could try using Sara to escort her, with every plane turned on to ASW.

PS - can you get the planes off at Penrhyn?

I think I can, but the damn Aikoku Maru took out my AKs so I have to wait for another groups of transports. At least a week.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by ny59giants »

Most of those troops at Calcutta have sub-50 experience levels and will need to get over that number to be truly helpful. Mr Kane came at me this way with about 8 or 9 divisions in March '42 and my two Aussie with a few poor Indian divisions just got worn down. If Nic is coming at you with most of what he had in Malaya, I don't think you can stop him at Calcutta.

Slightly OT - I would go into your "Device/Squads" list and click "Y" to stockpile both type of "Garrison" troops. If not, then when your static LCUs retreat they will take in a static garrison squad and plant themselves in the middle of nowhere. [X(]
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by witpqs »

IIRC a carrier can fly planes off, or dock and lift them off by crane. If a carrier is too damaged to lift them off then it has to dock. Port size might be a problem.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by JocMeister »

Have you built any deeper defensive lines in India? I agree with Michael that if GJ brings everything you can´t stop him there. Don´t have the map in fresh memory but I recall building 2 defensive line N/NW of Calcutta in good terrain.

Be very careful with the British units. Their squads replacement rates are terrible. Lose a full ID and it will take months and months to fill it back up.
Image
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

I'd even look at moving Yorktown somewhere that he doesn't know about once the minor float is knocked off. Forget getting any system off. You either move her soon, or wait a long time such that he thinks he missed her there. If you wait a long time, you risk getting sniffed out by aerial recon. I'd move her sooner. With 15 Sys, that's not so bad. I'd make a short hop to somewhere else to knock off a few more points, perhaps Tahiti, and then move for a shipyard. If you wait too long, I think you risk more subs getting into place and catching her on the way out. You could try using Sara to escort her, with every plane turned on to ASW.

PS - can you get the planes off at Penrhyn?

There's all the factors you mention, but also the fact that defending Penryn consumes a big part of the present USN OOB. For one carrier which will be gone--at best--for pretty much all of 1942. The old "wounded consume three times their number of the healthy" guerrilla tactic.

Carriers are useful. They are valuable. They aren't worth using up so many forces the you are hamstrung everywhere else for months. And while Pearl may look close and juicy it's a bad, bad place to drive to in this era with a 5-6 knot big target.

As the Allies you have to get comfortable with the substantial advantages off-map gives you. And EC is the place to repair anything big the fastest possible.
The Moose
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Most of those troops at Calcutta have sub-50 experience levels and will need to get over that number to be truly helpful. Mr Kane came at me this way with about 8 or 9 divisions in March '42 and my two Aussie with a few poor Indian divisions just got worn down. If Nic is coming at you with most of what he had in Malaya, I don't think you can stop him at Calcutta.

I agree. And look for a landing on any of the coastal bases to the west to cut the RR from Madras. India is a naval game, although a lot of players treat it as simple continental war. This is a place to sacrifice the pre-war cruisers if you have to. He's a long way from a yard.

Also, you must take a HARD look at garrison reqs in India. They are numerous, although most are not large. You don't have as much useable infantry and armor available to move as you might think. Under-garrisoning plays havoc with supply flow from Bombay and Karachi, your two main lifelines if Calcutta is invested.

You'll know soon if he plans to move deeper into India, but taking and holding Calcutta for six months is a nice HI point source, and he can certainly bring enough to take Calcutta right now.
The Moose
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Most of those troops at Calcutta have sub-50 experience levels and will need to get over that number to be truly helpful. Mr Kane came at me this way with about 8 or 9 divisions in March '42 and my two Aussie with a few poor Indian divisions just got worn down. If Nic is coming at you with most of what he had in Malaya, I don't think you can stop him at Calcutta.

I agree. And look for a landing on any of the coastal bases to the west to cut the RR from Madras. India is a naval game, although a lot of players treat it as simple continental war. This is a place to sacrifice the pre-war cruisers if you have to. He's a long way from a yard.

Also, you must take a HARD look at garrison reqs in India. They are numerous, although most are not large. You don't have as much useable infantry and armor available to move as you might think. Under-garrisoning plays havoc with supply flow from Bombay and Karachi, your two main lifelines if Calcutta is invested.

You'll know soon if he plans to move deeper into India, but taking and holding Calcutta for six months is a nice HI point source, and he can certainly bring enough to take Calcutta right now.

Good points of course, and the experience is an issue. The thing I'm banking on here is if I can get the US air groups to India I may be able to hold air supremacy. I've already got the PI B-17s and I'll have about 4 fighter and three 2E groups in addition to the RAF if they can make the sea journey safely during the next two weeks. They're just arriving at Cape Town now.

For ground troops the Brits and Indians get a lot in the next few months as well, and if he's going to cut off Calcutta, it'll take longer to grab.

I could also just get out of dodge and leave it, but I trust the terrain to let the troops hold while experience builds and more flood in.

I've got most of the RN leaving for Cape Town to regroup, but I could turn some around before they get off-map. I just think that might be a waste of useful ships if he's got what now appears to be a decent mini-KB here with about 40 Kates, some Vals left and a good 60-70 zeros.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

Have you built any deeper defensive lines in India? I agree with Michael that if GJ brings everything you can´t stop him there. Don´t have the map in fresh memory but I recall building 2 defensive line N/NW of Calcutta in good terrain.

Be very careful with the British units. Their squads replacement rates are terrible. Lose a full ID and it will take months and months to fill it back up.

Since we're just over a month into the war I've only concentrated on making Calcutta a fortress, with smaller allocations to Madras, Bombay and karachi. Those are the only troops in the sub-continent right now other than static garrisons. Not much. A lot come sin the next two months, but I have to get it there, and if he blockades, with the CV situation as it is, there is no chance to break that.

So I feel now my best chance is to hold in good terrain and hope for the best in terms of air defense, commander and terrain rolls, and if I can get a few big defeats it could slow down the whole process.

Is this unwise? Is it better to pull it all back to Karachi and wait?

Seems like I'd be in the same boat but sooner if I chose not to defend Calcutta.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

I'd even look at moving Yorktown somewhere that he doesn't know about once the minor float is knocked off. Forget getting any system off. You either move her soon, or wait a long time such that he thinks he missed her there. If you wait a long time, you risk getting sniffed out by aerial recon. I'd move her sooner. With 15 Sys, that's not so bad. I'd make a short hop to somewhere else to knock off a few more points, perhaps Tahiti, and then move for a shipyard. If you wait too long, I think you risk more subs getting into place and catching her on the way out. You could try using Sara to escort her, with every plane turned on to ASW.

PS - can you get the planes off at Penrhyn?

There's all the factors you mention, but also the fact that defending Penryn consumes a big part of the present USN OOB. For one carrier which will be gone--at best--for pretty much all of 1942. The old "wounded consume three times their number of the healthy" guerrilla tactic.

Carriers are useful. They are valuable. They aren't worth using up so many forces the you are hamstrung everywhere else for months. And while Pearl may look close and juicy it's a bad, bad place to drive to in this era with a 5-6 knot big target.

As the Allies you have to get comfortable with the substantial advantages off-map gives you. And EC is the place to repair anything big the fastest possible.

Wil do if I can get it there. he's just expended another four TT on DD in the Penrhyn hex, so hopefully these will have to go to Truk soon and I can get York in shape to move before more arrive.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

Have you built any deeper defensive lines in India? I agree with Michael that if GJ brings everything you can´t stop him there. Don´t have the map in fresh memory but I recall building 2 defensive line N/NW of Calcutta in good terrain.

Be very careful with the British units. Their squads replacement rates are terrible. Lose a full ID and it will take months and months to fill it back up.

Since we're just over a month into the war I've only concentrated on making Calcutta a fortress, with smaller allocations to Madras, Bombay and karachi. Those are the only troops in the sub-continent right now other than static garrisons. Not much. A lot come sin the next two months, but I have to get it there, and if he blockades, with the CV situation as it is, there is no chance to break that.

So I feel now my best chance is to hold in good terrain and hope for the best in terms of air defense, commander and terrain rolls, and if I can get a few big defeats it could slow down the whole process.

Is this unwise? Is it better to pull it all back to Karachi and wait?

Seems like I'd be in the same boat but sooner if I chose not to defend Calcutta.

I think you're right to hope for the best and just stick to good terrain, defensible places, etc.

Even if he takes Calcutta now, he can't hold it forever. It's a long, lonely sail from Singapore to Calcutta. He'll have some fuel available from Burma, but you'll be able to base out of Trincomalee or Madras (unless he takes those from you to). But basically, if he takes Calcutta - so what? I'm not sure you can stop him (though you should give it the ol' college try), and unless it threatens AV later it's nothing to worry about. It gets him some HI, sure, but I think Warmgr's game is a good example here - njp conquered most of India, but most of that is back in Allied hands by the end of 1942.

I also wouldn't look for him to defend both Calcutta and the South Pacific in major strength, so that gives you some options as well...

My .02.
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by SqzMyLemon »

Are the divisions landing at Diamond Harbor ones that were in Singapore? GreyJoy knows that to take India you have to capture Karachi and prevent reinforcements reaching the subcontinent. If the divisions he's landed at DH are from Singapore then I think you can rule out an early attempt at Karachi and the objective is to cut off Allied troops in Burma and benefit from whatever HI, fuel and supply he can gain for 6-8 months. I wouldn't neglect Karachi or Bombay just in case, with the emphasis on Karachi.

It will be interesting to see if he attempts a landing on Ceylon in an effort to secure his flank if the Calcutta region is indeed the objective.
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


I think you're right to hope for the best and just stick to good terrain, defensible places, etc.

Even if he takes Calcutta now, he can't hold it forever. It's a long, lonely sail from Singapore to Calcutta. He'll have some fuel available from Burma, but you'll be able to base out of Trincomalee or Madras (unless he takes those from you to). But basically, if he takes Calcutta - so what? I'm not sure you can stop him (though you should give it the ol' college try), and unless it threatens AV later it's nothing to worry about. It gets him some HI, sure, but I think Warmgr's game is a good example here - njp conquered most of India, but most of that is back in Allied hands by the end of 1942.

I also wouldn't look for him to defend both Calcutta and the South Pacific in major strength, so that gives you some options as well...

My .02.

The defenses of India come in the next few months in strength. GJ knows the OOB, and he may just be trying to take the Calcutta region for the economic benefit in the short term without a push for AV. Of course I cannot rule out AV so I have to attempt a defense with more than what comes to India in the usual reinforcements. I may need to get US ground forces there and fast.

The entire IJN is poised and in good position to rule the IO for some time. I think taking all of India has yet to be done in a PBEM unless I've missed something, but GJ is aggressive and knowledgeable in the area and he loves the dramatic move. I understand his psychology pretty well here and he could want to be the first to do it. He probably would be better off in the long run if he didn't, but that depends on if I can stop him as well.

I do see opportunities in the Pacific, especially No Pac now with all of the CVs occupied and early enough there isn't much else he could have up there.
ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

Are the divisions landing at Diamond Harbor ones that were in Singapore? GreyJoy knows that to take India you have to capture Karachi and prevent reinforcements reaching the subcontinent. If the divisions he's landed at DH are from Singapore then I think you can rule out an early attempt at Karachi and the objective is to cut off Allied troops in Burma and benefit from whatever HI, fuel and supply he can gain for 6-8 months. I wouldn't neglect Karachi or Bombay just in case, with the emphasis on Karachi.

It will be interesting to see if he attempts a landing on Ceylon in an effort to secure his flank if the Calcutta region is indeed the objective.

If that invasion fleet comes around Ceylon the first thing I'll do is throw everything now in Madras and Bombay into Karachi. I can't lose it and have any hope here.

If he goes all-in for India I'll have to do something bold as well, it seems. I'll start some units prepping for the Kuriles and Hokkaido now, just in case. Because Singers was such an unusual campaign due to the paradrop and split of the Brit forces, I don't know yet which forces were all there, but there were certaily more than this.

This is the list of what was at Singers during it's fall. Some are here, like the 33rd, 38th and 5th. Some are not yet at least. There are still ship offshore though, likely either waiting to land more units, air groups and/or lots of supply.

[font="Trebuchet MS"]38th/B Division
33rd Division
15th Ind Engineer Regiment
18th Division
5th Division
38th/A Division
21st Division
1st Tank Regiment
38th/C Division
25th Army
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment

3rd Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
34th Field AA Battalion
36th Field AA Battalion [/font]
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by Lowpe »

If you go after the Kuriles, go big or raid...grab several of the islands so you have an interlocking defense. It will be really tough to stay there, but it will definitely slow him down elsewhere. Realize that if you do invade, you will probably lose everyone so volunteers only!

Personally, I think it is a mistake to go there so early in force. You simply don't have the ability to project enough air power to win. Your supply lines are long...so the deck is I think stacked against you. Raids are another matter.

However, there is no doubt that you will distract Greyjoy! There have been some really good raids pulled off here by Bullwinkle, Mr. Kane, Bullwinkle and early invasion by Tiemanj.
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

If you go after the Kuriles, go big or raid...grab several of the islands so you have an interlocking defense. It will be really tough to stay there, but it will definitely slow him down elsewhere. Realize that if you do invade, you will probably lose everyone so volunteers only!

Personally, I think it is a mistake to go there so early in force. You simply don't have the ability to project enough air power to win. Your supply lines are long...so the deck is I think stacked against you. Raids are another matter.

However, there is no doubt that you will distract Greyjoy! There have been some really good raids pulled off here by Bullwinkle, Mr. Kane, Bullwinkle and early invasion by Tiemanj.

If he goes all-in for India I do have to distract, as you say, and a smaller op would be in order. If he's nearingAV though I have to go for points. High point targets will be prepped for and strategic areas will be targeted. Even early, if the KB isn't protecting against a raid in the DEI, and is blocking the passage to Karachi, I will use what CVs I can to hit oil and industry sooner rather than later.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”