Now we readers got another epic fight for Calcutta, finger crossed even if I bet on Japan
Also Obvert is a good writer so this is also another challenge between you two
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: MrBlizzard
Great AAR, you're very good in providing suspence to your stories; that makes the real difference for an AAR.
Now we readers got another epic fight for Calcutta, finger crossed even if I bet on Japan![]()
Also Obvert is a good writer so this is also another challenge between you two
ORIGINAL: castor troy
one more question. Why do you attack on Luzon? All you needed there is a force around 1000av that can be mostly second class like those ind bgds just to keep the Allied locked down to be bombed by your airforce. In March at the latest they will have run out of supplies at the latest and by May they will have lost hundreds of combat squads due to starvation. When I took Manila in May with a more or less pityful force khyberbill asked my why I didn't do that any earlier which reflects the situation he had there in the previous months already.
Wouldn't it be better to use your real combat power elsewhere instead of depleting it on Luzon that will just solve itself? Make sure no supplies are getting in and bomb them, the problem solves itself there. [:)]



ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
ORIGINAL: castor troy
one more question. Why do you attack on Luzon? All you needed there is a force around 1000av that can be mostly second class like those ind bgds just to keep the Allied locked down to be bombed by your airforce. In March at the latest they will have run out of supplies at the latest and by May they will have lost hundreds of combat squads due to starvation. When I took Manila in May with a more or less pityful force khyberbill asked my why I didn't do that any earlier which reflects the situation he had there in the previous months already.
Wouldn't it be better to use your real combat power elsewhere instead of depleting it on Luzon that will just solve itself? Make sure no supplies are getting in and bomb them, the problem solves itself there. [:)]
Good question. That was my original plan Castor. However, because of Erik's aggressiveness at Luzon and a couple of mistakes on my side, i wasn't able to estabilish any air supremacy over Manila-Clark so far. The AVG dominates the skies over Manila and Clark and i decided not to divert my zero units there, so to concentrate on a fast conquest of Malaya first and then to obtain immediately the air supremacy over Calcutta.
Probably a mistake, i know. Now i'm sending there some zeros, but it may be too late
I'm using in Luzon 2 IDs and a mixed bde, along with some tanks and 2 SNLF units. I'm attacking in order to conquer Clark and trap the enemy at Manila, hoping to force him back to Manila and so be able to conquer Bataan and then use the BBs against Manila.
Clark is a beast however and Erik got me a couple of bloody noses there already.
It will all depends on how the Calcutta thing develops.
If i see the light at Calcutta in the next few turns, i may send the 26th ID to Luzon so to give the 16th a break. If not, the 26th will immediately move towards India and Luzon will have to wait.
However, what you say (to leave just 1000 AVs of secondary line troops) cannot be done with the present situation.
Manila and Clark cannot be sieged with only 1000 AVs of secondary troops. He has some good quality troops there by now and if he advances towards Central Luzon, i may be not able to hold him back with some mixed regiments and Bdes. too risky.
ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
Then, we attacked...
Ground combat at Calcutta (52,37)
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 84829 troops, 885 guns, 381 vehicles, Assault Value = 2529
Defending force 38915 troops, 296 guns, 504 vehicles, Assault Value = 1142
Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2
Japanese adjusted assault: 1643
Allied adjusted defense: 1289
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 2)
Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 2
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)
Japanese ground losses:
2060 casualties reported
Squads: 16 destroyed, 289 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 5 destroyed, 28 disabled
Allied ground losses:
668 casualties reported
Squads: 17 destroyed, 54 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 39 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Guns lost 32 (9 destroyed, 23 disabled)
Vehicles lost 109 (14 destroyed, 95 disabled)
Assaulting units:
33rd Division
38th Division
21st Division
20th Ind Engineer Regiment
5th Division
19th Ind Engineer Regiment
18th Division
2nd Division
2nd Raiding Rgt /1
2nd Mortar Battalion
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Mortar Battalion
3rd Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
Southern Army
14th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
34th Field AA Battalion
16th AA Regiment
31st Fld AA Gun Co
35th Field AA Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
47th Field AA Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
20th AA Regiment
25th Army
3rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
1st RF Gun Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
12th JAAF Base Force
Defending units:
50th Tank Brigade
254th Armoured Brigade
18th British Division
255th Armoured Brigade
43rd Cavalry Regiment
1st Patiala Lancers Regiment
Fort William
44th Indian Brigade
45th Indian Brigade
36th Indian Brigade
23rd Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
India Command
Eastern Command
6th Heavy AA Regiment
35th Light AA Regiment

I don't think that is what happens. The message will say shock attack if any unit does that, but the other units can still make deliberate attacks or bombardment attacks.ORIGINAL: Cribtop
The paras marching in over the rivers convert the whole thing into a shock attack, so be careful. That said, a tremendous result and I think the base is doomed. Two more attacks to kill forts, you will take it on the second or third attack.
Why let them retreat at all? I'd kamikaze another unit to close the last hexside.


