The US lends their Buffalo to the CW, who go, "Gee, um, thanks?"
The US lends the remaining Kittyhawk to the Chinese.
Ch: 5+1: FTR-2, ART, no build points saved;
CW: 22+0: HQ-I, 2xINF, 2xFTR-2, 2xPi, CVP-1, start TRS, no build points saved;
US: 54+0: ARM, MOT XX, 2xINF, 2xFTR-2, 2xNAV-3, 4xCP-1, 7xPi, Start AMPH, Start Princeton, Finish Alabama (4), Repair HMAS Sydney, start sub, finish sub, 1 build point saved;
SU: 16+0: ARM, 3xMIL, FTR, Pi.
The Chinese really wish they had the five point Kittyhawk that went to the CW. The CW, however, thinks that they need a five point fighter that can reach the three box in the Med more than the Chinese need to defend against strat bombing. It is a very useful plane; I do not know where it belongs.
The Chinese build the Kittyhawk (str 4, range 8) and the Nationalist Chinese ART (3-2).
The CW rebuild Alexander, get a 5-3 Ind and a 6-3 Can INF, the 5 point Kittyhawk, a 5 point RSA Spitfire, and a 3-3 (size 3) Albacore, and started a range 4 TRS,
Where is the US O-chit? One can't use an O-chit until there are units to O, and right now the US doesn't have very many units. Also, an O-chit built this turn will arrive in J/F 42; even if I had one, I will not be using an O-chit in a J/F turn. What the US really regrets not building are LND bombers; however, the defensive units -- FTRs and NAVs -- are needed more.
The US builds an 8-6 white print ARM, a 1-5 MOT XX, an SBC-4 (0-3, size 1), 2xSBD 4, (4-2), SBD-5 (3-4), start start a 5 point 5-2 SUB, and finish a 3 point 5-3 SUB.
The US is not happy with its carrier planes; it wants some planes with 5 air-to-air factors.
The Russians really weren't wild about building that ARM, but they couldn't build what they really wanted -- 6 MIL units -- because of gearing limits. Unfortunately, they got the worst of their two remaining ARM units, a 6-6. For what's its worth, the Russian built the Saratov, Rostov, and Tashkent Mil. It doesn't make too much difference what MIL exactly were built, as they all will be built fairly shortly anyway.






