Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
Rudd
Posts: 468
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:34 am

Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Post by Rudd »

Thought these CGIs were really cool
Image
more here https://www.flickr.com/photos/qeclassca ... 5940326045
and here's actual photos https://www.flickr.com/photos/qeclasscarriers/
smudge56
Posts: 667
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:31 am
Location: UK

RE: Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Post by smudge56 »

Watched the naming process today. It looks an impressive ship, especially next to the illustrious class carrier. Though I suggest the government get there finger out and purchase some more aircraft. 3 airplanes are going to look lonely aboard the aircraft carrier. [:D]
AKA - Smudge
User avatar
MR_BURNS2
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:19 am
Location: Austria

RE: Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Post by MR_BURNS2 »

Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;


User avatar
Vegan
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:42 pm

RE: Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Post by Vegan »

That's some very good quality CGI.
User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Post by NakedWeasel »

That's a great ship, and a fantastic new capability for Britain, indeed. I think I see quite a few US Navy carrier features in her.
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
zaytsev
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2014 6:03 am

RE: Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Post by zaytsev »

Hmm, it seems that they'll extend support for commercial flights too.
As for arrival / departure screens. [:D]
User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Post by NakedWeasel »

I was surprised at the scene where all the flight deck flood lights were switched on. Light security is a VERY big deal in the US Navy, we couldn't even smoke a cigarette on the weather decks after sundown. Is it not as large a concern in the British Navy?
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
User avatar
Anathema
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

RE: Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Post by Anathema »

If I had to take a guess that would be simply because you need lights for 3D and to be able to see things clearly. Sure they could have gone with a green NVG look, but the animators/vfx people probably thought well if we need to add lights to the scene and don't have a sun, lets turn on the ship's lights because that will look good and sell the idea it is meant to be night in what is basically meant to be advertising where looks count.
User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Post by NakedWeasel »

I understand what you are saying, but my point was this; In the USN, when you are out at sea in the evening, all lights are kept extinguished as much as possible. This would include (especially) the lights on the flight deck of a carrier. In the longer CGI movie about the QE, there is a scene where they have turned the flight deck flood lights on. obviously, this is a VERY bright source of illumination. In my experience, this is a huge NO NO.
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
zaytsev
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2014 6:03 am

RE: Queen Elizabeth carrier CGI/photo links

Post by zaytsev »

Although QE and PoW look cool I would comment on poor design.
Both elevators are just on starboard side.
Same with weapon elevator/s and its door are turned to the sea, not deck, could be for safety?, but crew have to go around bridge still.
What's with those big kinky bridge windows, oh yes they blend in just fine as a wallstreet building out in the open ocean.
How about we spray whole section with some glass. Nowhere in the world in naval/aerospace, towers, ships, planes are
windows that big just because they can. Oh it is reinforced glass alright, but how much does that cost?

What I want to point that she was not designed for taking hits, ok maybe defence, but one or two lucky leakers could make her inoperable for good.
It is however HVU and expect significant salvo in her way. Maybe not exocets, har har har.

Somehow they seems to be too modern, not safe, but 'feels' just goodeee, catch my drift.
They just look 'dangerous', they will cost as hell, But will they survive long enough?
Guess they're not gonna be build in china, are they, nudge nudge.

Yeah let's build two , tax payers approved :)

Cheerio
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”