cvp rebase bug

Post bug reports and ask for game support here.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

Post Reply
joshuamnave
Posts: 967
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:51 am
Contact:

cvp rebase bug

Post by joshuamnave »

Trying to move my outdated cvp's onto smaller ships. All ships are in the same port, so I should be able to rebase the planes without using any air missions, which (sort of, clunkily) works in most situations. In this saved game file, I have no air missions left at the start of the air rebase phase, and it won't let me move my cvp's around even though it should.
Attachments
cvprebase.zip
(1.6 MiB) Downloaded 6 times
Head Geek in Charge at politigeek.net - the intersection of politics and all things geeky
User avatar
Dabrion
Posts: 740
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:26 am
Location: Northpole

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by Dabrion »

You may rebase but it will cost air actions. What makes you think it doesn't?
"If we come to a minefield, our infantry attacks exactly as it were not there." ~ Georgy Zhukov
User avatar
Sabre21
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 8:00 am
Location: on a mountain in Idaho

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by Sabre21 »

ORIGINAL: Dabrion

You may rebase but it will cost air actions. What makes you think it doesn't?

As per RAC 11.17 - Carrier air units may rebase within a hex (land to carrier, carrier to land, or from one carrier to another) for no cost against activity limits.
Image
User avatar
Dabrion
Posts: 740
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:26 am
Location: Northpole

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by Dabrion »

Isn't 14.4.1 *Rebasing* overruling that?
"If we come to a minefield, our infantry attacks exactly as it were not there." ~ Georgy Zhukov
User avatar
Sabre21
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 8:00 am
Location: on a mountain in Idaho

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by Sabre21 »

ORIGINAL: Dabrion

Isn't 14.4.1 *Rebasing* overruling that?

From the way I read it if the carrier air unit remains in the same port or sea zone box then it doesn't use an air action.

From 14.4.1 - You can also rebase a carrier plane from a CV to another CV in the same sea-box section or port, or from a CV to the port hex it is in or vice versa. Each of these counts as a rebase for activities limits (Deviation: unless the carrier air unit remains in the same port or sea area section box).
Image
joshuamnave
Posts: 967
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:51 am
Contact:

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by joshuamnave »

When I have at least one air action left, I can rebase an infinite number of cvp's within the same port. That is in accordance with the rule as quoted above. When I have 0 air actions left, I can't rebase any of them.
Head Geek in Charge at politigeek.net - the intersection of politics and all things geeky
User avatar
Dabrion
Posts: 740
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:26 am
Location: Northpole

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by Dabrion »

After reading RAC I think it is meant to be free in MWiF. And what Zartacla describes sound like unwanted behavior in that regard.
"If we come to a minefield, our infantry attacks exactly as it were not there." ~ Georgy Zhukov
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9084
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by Centuur »

I think it has something to do with the fact that if there is no free carrier to land the CV plane on, it can't rebase to another CV.

It is the same type of bug as the one regarding overstacking, I believe...

At this moment the game doesn't allow you to land two planes on a carrier if they don't fit on the ship together, even in the rebase phase.

So it's a bug...
Peter
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8516
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by paulderynck »

Good theory for when the CVs are in the same box and both fully stacked. Similar to being unable to temporarily overstack in land movement.

Maybe a similar workaround is possible - try rebasing a CVP to land, doing the free rebasing, then undoing the CVP that rebased to land. The trouble is, you'd need one remaining air mission to get the process started.
Paul
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9084
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by Centuur »

Since the CV the plane came from originally is now occupied with another CVP, you can't use the undo button...
Peter
User avatar
Courtenay
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:34 pm

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by Courtenay »

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I wanted to point out that the theory that all carriers are full is not correct. In the attached game, there are two CW carriers in Liverpool. One is empty, and the other has a single size one CVP on it. The CW went into the air rebase phase with no air actions remaining. It should be possible to move the plane from one carrier to the other, or to shore, but it is not.

Edit added later:

Oops. Just noticed that the plane does not fit on one of the carriers. It should still be possible to rebase the CVP to the port, though, so there is a bug. Also, the is a British carrier at Malta with space available, and planes can not be rebased to it.
Attachments
CVPRebaseBug.zip
(1.63 MiB) Downloaded 3 times
I thought I knew how to play this game....
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: cvp rebase bug

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I wanted to point out that the theory that all carriers are full is not correct. In the attached game, there are two CW carriers in Liverpool. One is empty, and the other has a single size one CVP on it. The CW went into the air rebase phase with no air actions remaining. It should be possible to move the plane from one carrier to the other, or to shore, but it is not.

Edit added later:

Oops. Just noticed that the plane does not fit on one of the carriers. It should still be possible to rebase the CVP to the port, though, so there is a bug. Also, the is a British carrier at Malta with space available, and planes can not be rebased to it.
Reactivating an old thread with new information is a good thing - not a bad thing.
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”