PBEM Uneasy?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Bill Durrant
Posts: 963
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 1:39 am
Location: Oxfordshire

PBEM Uneasy?

Post by Bill Durrant »

No names, no pack drill.

Just started a team game as the Allies. We received the turn and I'm sure we did everything right and sent it back. The Japanese opposition retorted that their orders were not assigned correctly and asked us to redo the turn after sending us a new file. It was the first turn which is obviously a long process.

My question: Is it possible the opponent (Japanese) can just look at the combat and say that the program messed up and ask to redo everything having had an insight to our proposed actions? Or am I being paranoid?

Thanks in advance
Sunk by 35cm/45 1YT Gun - Near Singapore
mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: Bill Durrant

No names, no pack drill.

Just started a team game as the Allies. We received the turn and I'm sure we did everything right and sent it back. The Japanese opposition retorted that their orders were not assigned correctly and asked us to redo the turn after sending us a new file. It was the first turn which is obviously a long process.

My question: Is it possible the opponent (Japanese) can just look at the combat and say that the program messed up and ask to redo everything having had an insight to our proposed actions? Or am I being paranoid?

Thanks in advance

Ask for the wpae.001 file so that you see what they see.
BattleMoose
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 12:16 am

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by BattleMoose »

Ask for the replay and use that to inform your decision. They got to view it and have an advantage because of it. And they know your intentions.

We all make mistakes. In my PBEM match up we occasionally own up to our mistakes and live with the consequences.

Its tricky. Asking someone to redo a turn, especially the first turn is a big favour to ask. And they aren't really giving you any information to warrant such a favour.
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by Alfred »

Just surrender immediately and start a new game with different opponents.
 
What happened here is that your opponents did not get the result they were expecting.  Perhaps their PH strike did not sink sufficient ships to their liking.
 
Sooner rather than later they will come across another turn where they do not get their optimum results.  Then you will get the same request to redo the turn.  Plus there will be other game quibbles which will be put up.
 
Nor can you play this potentially 1500+ turn game replaying a turn every time one side forgot to give an order to an AMc operating out of Shanghai.
 
Best to just nip it in the bud immediately.  Either they continue with turn 2 based on what happened now, or you just find new opponents.
 
Alfred 
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by geofflambert »

ORIGINAL: Bill Durrant

No names, no pack drill.

Just started a team game as the Allies. We received the turn and I'm sure we did everything right and sent it back. The Japanese opposition retorted that their orders were not assigned correctly and asked us to redo the turn after sending us a new file. It was the first turn which is obviously a long process.

My question: Is it possible the opponent (Japanese) can just look at the combat and say that the program messed up and ask to redo everything having had an insight to our proposed actions? Or am I being paranoid?

Thanks in advance

Bill, I'm sorry to have to be the one to inform you that being paranoid is the least of your troubles. You are obviously experiencing a sort of psychosis we like to call I'msorryIeveragreedtoplaythisgamewithorwithouthouserules syndrome. Report immediately to the nearest ER and let them do a biopsy of your wallet. It would be extremely unwise to delay the inevitable.

User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by geofflambert »

I also agree with everything Alfred says, as always, but I'd still like to do a biopsy of his wallet.

User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by Chickenboy »

Lucrectomy? I kind of like the sound of that.
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Bill Durrant

No names, no pack drill.

Bill, if you posted in the "Opponents Wanted" section of this forum, can I ask you to point us to your communication in that thread? Don't want names, no 'pack drill' (whatever that means). I just would like to see the thread.

Thanks in advance.

ETA: I like the idea of getting the 001 replay file (and combat report would be nice too) from your opponents and reviewing.

It is possible that, assuming an ahistorical start, you may have inadvertently misapplied some orders where none were due (e.g., 100% CAP at PH on day 1, scrambled ships from port, etc.). It would have been helpful if your opponent identified specifically what errors were seen in the turn for your information.

I don't believe that there is any immediate ill will or malignant motives behind your opponent, but they should have provided more information to you than they did.

Your use of the word "retort" suggests that they were peevish and surly-could this be a language difference perchance? Something 'lost in translation'?
Image
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: BattleMoose

Ask for the replay and use that to inform your decision. They got to view it and have an advantage because of it. And they know your intentions.

We all make mistakes. In my PBEM match up we occasionally own up to our mistakes and live with the consequences.

Its tricky. Asking someone to redo a turn, especially the first turn is a big favour to ask. And they aren't really giving you any information to warrant such a favour.

Adm Nelson and I have had issues with my install. He has had to do two re-dos of turns. I have sent him the old 001 or screenshots so he knows what actually happened. I would have questions regarding this as well if I did not get proof.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by geofflambert »

Chickenboy, a "lucrectomy" is what happens after I do a biopsy of Alfred's wallet. I take his filthy "lucre" and put it in my pocket.

User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

Chickenboy, a "lucrectomy" is what happens after I do a biopsy of Alfred's wallet. I take his filthy "lucre" and put it in my pocket.

Uh...yes. Which is why I proposed the term...[&:]

Are you molting again? You seem to go soft in the head when you do. [:'(]
Image
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by geofflambert »

Hey, everyone who knows me well addresses me as "Al Dente". Now, I am not now nor have I ever been an Arab, so I'm not sure what that's about. But I know a little Italian and I can say without equivocation that my noodles are every bit as stiff as anyone else's. Just don't quote me on that.

User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by LoBaron »

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Just surrender immediately and start a new game with different opponents.

This.

Except if you opponents are well known (either to you or the forum community) so you can basically rule out a cheat. In that case I would request the replay and a very detailed information about what failed, even if it requires lifting opsec.
Image
Itdepends
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:59 am

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by Itdepends »

Regarding the viewing of the turn 1 file- the allied player will gain more out of that than the Japanese player given the limited opening moves available to the Allies. However I'd also question if you've found the right opponent- they may have even forgotten something important in their orders. I do it reasonably regularly. If I was playing the AI I'd probably go back and fix it- but I'm not- and those mistakes are part of what makes a PBEM special.
User avatar
patrickl
Posts: 1530
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 6:57 pm
Location: Singapore

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by patrickl »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

ORIGINAL: BattleMoose

Ask for the replay and use that to inform your decision. They got to view it and have an advantage because of it. And they know your intentions.

We all make mistakes. In my PBEM match up we occasionally own up to our mistakes and live with the consequences.

Its tricky. Asking someone to redo a turn, especially the first turn is a big favour to ask. And they aren't really giving you any information to warrant such a favour.

Adm Nelson and I have had issues with my install. He has had to do two re-dos of turns. I have sent him the old 001 or screenshots so he knows what actually happened. I would have questions regarding this as well if I did not get proof.

Roger that, I played a game against JB447 and midway thru my pc died and I installed the latest beta patch but Jeremy got the last official patch so he could not open my turn. Different updates do have this problem. I had to install the last official patch to continue the game.[:)]
Image
Banner designed by rogueusmc
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6424
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

Chickenboy, a "lucrectomy" is what happens after I do a biopsy of Alfred's wallet. I take his filthy "lucre" and put it in my pocket.
You'll only find South Pacific shekels.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by Dili »

The biggest problem with this is not even an eventual cheating. Is that in a first turn there is something important forgotten. It seems the other side does not care for the investment in time that a PBEM implies.
User avatar
Miller
Posts: 2227
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Ashington, England.

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by Miller »

End the game now, trust me you will be saving a lot of wasted time in the future.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by Lowpe »

I haven't done this prior, but isn't there a trick when playing Japan that you run the turn (under a different save file) after having spent countless hours working on it to make sure you did do everything right with magic task forces etc. -- before sending the file off to the Allies.



User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: PBEM Uneasy?

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I haven't done this prior, but isn't there a trick when playing Japan that you run the turn (under a different save file) after having spent countless hours working on it to make sure you did do everything right with magic task forces etc. -- before sending the file off to the Allies.

Yes. One can 'dry run' the first turn as the Japanese.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”