Today Fusan added 800K Resources bringing the total there over 1 million. For the last several months resources have been around 200K plus or minus 100K or so.
All the resources came directly from China.
So what changed?[:)]

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Did I ever mention I really hate night bombing before? Base was not over crowded, and will most likely get visited by another massive night bombing run tonight and if I plan on sending ships into Rangoon then I will lose another 20 fighters on the ground. Sigh. Maybe there will be bad weather.
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Dinah - I'll take speed over armour. It's also far better armed than the Peggy or Nick NF's, which have miserable accuracy on their guns. Obvert had lots of nasty things to say about the Dinah NF, like falling from the skies in droves, impossible to keep squadrons filled, etc. And since neither has radar, I will go with Nick for durability until Peggy comes along. Except for those squadrons that must use Dinah. Dinah also comes 6 months later than NicK.
Randy - Pretty much the only late-war choice for the IJA, but it's getting it into action in time to matter that's the real problem. Without Radar I fear that Randy isn't that great and the Radar activates very late. So I see no point in r&d this plane. If I make it that far I will try to build it, but that is doubtful.
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Don't get me started on night bombing. I've had big level airbases at the 50-60% capacity lose fifty or so planes on the ground - I suspect the ground crews are stacking them wingtip to wingtip, or keep putting them next to the ammo dump.
Obvert had lots of nasty things to say about the Dinah NF, like falling from the skies in droves, impossible to keep squadrons filled, etc. And since neither has radar, I will go with Nick for durability until Peggy comes along. Except for those squadrons that must use Dinah. Dinah also comes 6 months later than NicK.
Without Radar I fear that Randy isn't that great and the Radar activates very late. So I see no point in r&d this plane. If I make it that far I will try to build it, but that is doubtful.
If I remember correctly you are being bombed very low, like 2-3K altitude which really makes for devastating raids. I have enough AA to prevent that, plus worthless balloons.
I suspect that in this game, if the Allies pursued an oil and then industry bombing campaign from the get go (July 42) it would be game over. Instead I got almost full Magwe oil production until June of 43. If I can make June of 44 for Palembang I will be ecstatic, but I don't see how I can manage it.
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Obvert did an excellent post on his AAR exploring the ranges of the B-29 from various bases in Oz and Burma that I can't seem to find for the life of me. If you can dig it up, it might be worth reviewing.
ORIGINAL: mind_messingIf I remember correctly you are being bombed very low, like 2-3K altitude which really makes for devastating raids. I have enough AA to prevent that, plus worthless balloons.
I thought the same. I was wrong. You'll damage them, you might knock out a couple of bombers over several raids, but you won't stop the airbase getting trashed and the aircraft being wrecked on the ground.
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
It doesn't really matter what you send up against 4E's, they'll die in droves regardless.
What matters is getting shots onto the bombers to disrupt and damage them, and you're not likely to do that with the abysmal accuracy on the Nick or Peggy NF's. You're paying the HI for the two engines anyways, so you may as well get the best plane.
I did, or didn't do, something that is going to really hurt. I feel it in my bones. I have had this nameless dread on several occasions, normally when I tried to force some naval bombardment or complex air attack, but it feels different this time. Perhaps it is my fever...perhaps everything will work out, but I don't think so.ORIGINAL: Lowpe
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Obvert did an excellent post on his AAR exploring the ranges of the B-29 from various bases in Oz and Burma that I can't seem to find for the life of me. If you can dig it up, it might be worth reviewing.
I have gotten into the habit of re-reading Obvert's AAR two months in advance of my game date. I haven't come across that post, but I do vaguely remember it. It isn't great reading. I will keep my eye peeled for it.
I am around page 42 and have yet to come across it yet. They didn't really start night bombing until 44?
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
ORIGINAL: mind_messingIf I remember correctly you are being bombed very low, like 2-3K altitude which really makes for devastating raids. I have enough AA to prevent that, plus worthless balloons.
I thought the same. I was wrong. You'll damage them, you might knock out a couple of bombers over several raids, but you won't stop the airbase getting trashed and the aircraft being wrecked on the ground.
Yes,you are quite correct in that the airfield and planes get trashed, but thankfully the price is too high in my game for the Allies to pay...he stopped low level bombing airfields a long time ago. Not so for troops, alas.
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
It doesn't really matter what you send up against 4E's, they'll die in droves regardless.
What matters is getting shots onto the bombers to disrupt and damage them, and you're not likely to do that with the abysmal accuracy on the Nick or Peggy NF's. You're paying the HI for the two engines anyways, so you may as well get the best plane.
Well, you are going for speed and guns, I am going for staying power. It will be interesting to see which is better. Complex game yields many correct answers.






