RA 6.7 question to Sir John 3rd

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design, art and sound modding and the game editor for WITP Admiral's Edition.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
guctony
Posts: 669
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:56 am

RA 6.7 question to Sir John 3rd

Post by guctony »

Dear John 3rd

If you look at the picture one of the main gun of Yahagi class CL is RS position. Is it WAD or we need to make a correction.

Image
Attachments
rightside.jpg
rightside.jpg (169.58 KiB) Viewed 199 times
"Unless a nation's life faces peril, war is murder."
"Sovereignty is not given, it is taken."
"After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well."
Mustafa Kemal
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: RA 6.7 question to Sir John 3rd

Post by John 3rd »

You are playing RA so I shall look at the files. Headed for bed presently so I'll tackle this tomorrow.

Thanks for catching it...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: RA 6.7 question to Sir John 3rd

Post by John 3rd »

You were RIGHT on this one Sir! The is a similar error in Between the Storms as well as RA. It is not in Treaty but the other two have now been changed and I shall update the Mods on the Website within a few minutes.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
moore4807
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Punta Gorda FL

RE: RA 6.7 question to Sir John 3rd

Post by moore4807 »

I just found this in my RA PBEM game and what brought it to my attention was the trying to disband the P-40 edition of the 35th FG.

I believe the screen message was to the effect that I couldn't disband as there were other fragments... Which you can see the unit OOB is not lit up.

Only after manually searching the fighter groups did I find this... but they are separate unit identities.

Just asking - not complaining, how do I fix this? I do not recall reactivating either unit, but who knows what I did???

Image
Attachments
35thFGHQcombined.jpg
35thFGHQcombined.jpg (436.72 KiB) Viewed 199 times
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 15137
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: RA 6.7 question to Sir John 3rd

Post by btd64 »

They both have different slot numbers, 4316 and 4317. Both under different HQ's. Should be able to disband or withdraw. Doesn't indicate any other parts as the OOB button is greyed out. I would pull out the pilots first when you withdraw. Would like to see a screen shot of the message you get Also, which version of RA? I have most of them and can take a look....GP
IntelUltra7 16cores, 32gb ram, NvidiaGeForceRTX 2050
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command" Gen. George S. Patton
WiS Discord channel coming soon....
User avatar
Symon
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:59 pm
Location: De Eye-lands, Mon

RE: RA 6.7 question to Sir John 3rd

Post by Symon »

ORIGINAL: moore4807
Just asking - not complaining, how do I fix this? I do not recall reactivating either unit, but who knows what I did???
You didn't do anything. They are completely unrelated. One is not a fragment of the other.

What happened is ... in the original Airgroup definitions:
(4316) 31st PG/HqS does a 'Rename' to 35th PG/HqS on 420115, and then another to 35th FG/HqS on 420515.
(4317) 35th PG/HqS does a 'Rename' to 35th FG/HqS on 420515.
So you have 2 units with the same name but who are totally unrelated. Think it was a just typo on the part of the original Air OOB folks. To 'fix' it, just edit the renames for the 31st, and change 35th to 31st. That should save confusion.

Whatever problem you are having is not related to this. The units are unrelated, each with no pointers to anywhere else. The only similarity is in the 'Name' field.

Hope this helps. JWE
Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.
User avatar
moore4807
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Punta Gorda FL

RE: RA 6.7 question to Sir John 3rd

Post by moore4807 »

GP - our RA version is 7.0 (1123X9) I'm waiting for a turn from LarryF and I will try disbanding the unit again.

I had replaced the pilots with rookies so no great harm if they are lost.

Missing what the message said was my fault - I keep the delay to .1 so if I hit the escape key it runs pretty fast by them all.
I usually get the same info from reading the Ops Report.
Attachments
preferences.jpg
preferences.jpg (147.17 KiB) Viewed 200 times
User avatar
moore4807
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Punta Gorda FL

RE: RA 6.7 question to Sir John 3rd

Post by moore4807 »

Symon,

Thanks for the answer, I'll leave the editing to experts like yourself and others [&o]

These units aren't going to win the war for me anyway. I'll simply disband both units and be done with it. (unless you know of a reason not to do that...)[:)]


Thanks for your time!

Jim
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design and Modding”