::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

American CVEs - I divide them up into two types - Replenishment and normal. At this stage, I take off the DB/TB from the Replenishment type (28 fighters and 28 DB/TBs) and use them strictly as fighter only CVEs. Rather than use up your faster CL/CAs as escorts, I usually put one or two of the old BBs there for AA and as torpedo magnets. After the mid-December influx of three more normal CVEs, you can have a TF with 175 Wildcats to help cover your invasions. [:)] Don't foget that you get over 90 CVEs throughout the war. [X(]

This is exactly my feeling, and just what I've been doing. All strike planes fly off to train up and be used as LBA. I've got two BBs traveling with them as well.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: leehunt27@bloomberg.net

I second nyg59giants point-- the Marshalls are great to have for the Allies, despite their low VP's and economic value. They allow you to "own" the central Pacific SLOC's and any Japanese fleet movement can be spotted by your PBY Catalina's etc. And conversely the Japanese don't know what your ships are up to in the Central Pacific until you are right on the Marianas doorstep. The Marshalls are worth taking and risking small amphibious TF's even if the KB shows up and smashes one or two of them.

Also I think myself and many others reading your AAR are seeing the futility of a Japanese attack on India (unless its an all out, go for broke autovictory attempt). The Japanese are weighted too much in the wrong direction when the real brunt of the Allied counteroffensive is steaming out of Hawaii and bases in the South Pacific.

The India campaign may not be what he intended but that is mainly that Calcutta industry got trashed. What it is doing is making it tough for me to hold China as I'd like to do without being able to fly supply in. More and more, and as he uses massive air assets there (around 300-400 bombers a turn some days) it becomes harder to hold even in good terrain. I have to hope this hurts the Japanese economy in the long run, but I can't bank on that and have to put as much pressure on elsewhere to hopefully strain the available resources.

Well, to look on the positive, he is not using those masses of bombers elsewhere-which I think he would be better off doing. I really do think that Japan cannot ever afford this kind of supply burn early in the war. Time will tell.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

American CVEs - I divide them up into two types - Replenishment and normal. At this stage, I take off the DB/TB from the Replenishment type (28 fighters and 28 DB/TBs) and use them strictly as fighter only CVEs. Rather than use up your faster CL/CAs as escorts, I usually put one or two of the old BBs there for AA and as torpedo magnets. After the mid-December influx of three more normal CVEs, you can have a TF with 175 Wildcats to help cover your invasions. [:)] Don't foget that you get over 90 CVEs throughout the war. [X(]


Yeah for me all of those 28 plane VR groups get pulled off and used for training in 1942. You really have so few training units-especially torpedo bombers that it is a must. Otherwise when your fleet really starts to expand in 1943 you are going to be very short of good pilots. The temptation is to use them in combat but it is robbing Peter to pay Paul.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by BBfanboy »

Change of subject: Curious result in your combats at Lunga - on both Nov. 20 and Nov. 21 combats the 47th JNAF Unit is shown as wiped out. I thought wiped out meant totally destroyed - so how could it appear in two different combats? Does FOW apply to the "wiped-out" messages?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Change of subject: Curious result in your combats at Lunga - on both Nov. 20 and Nov. 21 combats the 47th JNAF Unit is shown as wiped out. I thought wiped out meant totally destroyed - so how could it appear in two different combats? Does FOW apply to the "wiped-out" messages?

I wondered about that too. It was still there in terms of showing up as three units instead of two during the turn as well. Who knows?

They're all gone now though! [:)]
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

[font="Times New Roman"]Nov 23 - 25, 1942[/font]
[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]SUBS: [/font] The subs in the straits of Malaya still haven't seen any sign of the KB. It's probably gotten through earlier or on another route. I'll have to move most of these back now due to damage from the patrols in the area.

Still haven't gotten an attack on the ships up in the Marshalls, but search planes combined with a sub in the same hex got some intriguing info.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]INDIA: [/font] I'm considering sending an army out on its own toward Darjeeling, try to by-pass the Patna stronghold. Could I make it without air cover? Not sure.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]CENT PAC: [/font] Good search reports come in showing all kinds of the IJN up in the Marshalls looking ominous. I think it's a mini-KB and some BBs and cruisers. Enough to scare me back toward Canton Island for a few turns though. Still loading for Nauru, but this TF will stop at Nanumea and wait to see what happens here. Need subs to do something.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]CHINA: [/font] In China some P-40Ks guess right and end up surviving an Oscar sweep to stay around in number for the main show, about 200 2E hitting Kweiyang. In spite of missing the incoming run due to their altitude at 15k, they hit the bombers o n the way out, downing around 18-19 on the day! Finally. As he gets closer to Chungking he has to think about how to handle this, and I also have to be wary of an all-in strike to shut the field there. It would be long range though, so a risk for him, but if my CAP is all set to long range, maybe not. He has to wonder at least since only the P-40s were at Kweiyang.

All troops get back into Kweiyang and the penalty for overstacking by anout 15k seems not so bad. Maybe it doesn't affect things so much when the base only has 80 supply points in it! [;)]

Good troops were able to shift back into Kweiyang and the worn out units will head to the rear to dig in and heal up. Now things get really interesting.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]SIGINT:[/font] Interesting. Biak.

[font="Trebuchet MS"]1/14th Division is loaded on a Japanese CM moving to Biak.[/font]

[font="Trebuchet MS"]--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Nov 24, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Morning Air attack on 62nd Chinese Corps, at 76,50 , near Chihkiang

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 43 NM, estimated altitude 25,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIb Oscar x 10

Allied aircraft
P-40K Warhawk x 22

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-IIb Oscar: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-40K Warhawk: 2 destroyed

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 62nd Chinese Corps, at 76,50 , near Chihkiang

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 15 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G3M2 Nell x 42
G4M1 Betty x 58

Allied aircraft
P-40K Warhawk x 12

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M2 Nell: 2 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 4 destroyed, 1 damaged


No Allied losses

Allied ground losses:
69 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled

Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
42 x G3M2 Nell bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 75th Chinese Corps, at 76,50 , near Chihkiang

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 6,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-Ic Sally x 4
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 61
Ki-49-Ia Helen x 5
Ki-49-IIa Helen x 36

Allied aircraft
P-40K Warhawk x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-Ic Sally: 1 damaged
Ki-49-IIa Helen: 2 destroyed

No Allied losses

Allied ground losses:
138 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled

Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
25 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Nov 25, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Night Naval bombardment of Wenchow at 89,58

Japanese Ships
CL Agano
E Otori

Allied ground losses:
10 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase hits 2
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 2
Port hits 2

F1M2 Pete acting as spotter for CL Agano
CL Agano firing at Wenchow
E Otori firing at 100th Chinese Corps

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[/font]

Image
[font="Trebuchet MS"]This is a bit worrisome, but if I can get some more CVEs into play here, maybe I can get enough cover to challenge. Doesn't look like a lot of CV/CVE here. All of this disappeared the next day. [/font]
Attachments
Screenshot..02.01.37.jpg
Screenshot..02.01.37.jpg (523.07 KiB) Viewed 418 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
apbarog
Posts: 3821
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 6:54 am

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by apbarog »

Lurker decloaking! I've been reading your thread from day 1, and wanted to say that I like your AAR presentation style and I'm enjoying your gameplay. I can't comment as I've been reading both sides, but keep up the good work.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: obvert
This is a bit worrisome, but if I can get some more CVEs into play here, maybe I can get enough cover to challenge. Doesn't look like a lot of CV/CVE here. All of this disappeared the next day.

Just a bit? [:)]

What makes you think it is just the mini-kb? Interpreting these search results seems like a black science to me.
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: apbarog

Lurker decloaking! I've been reading your thread from day 1, and wanted to say that I like your AAR presentation style and I'm enjoying your gameplay. I can't comment as I've been reading both sides, but keep up the good work.

Thanks! Neither of us mind much if someone is reading both sides and wants to comment. We've both been through duel AARs before and it makes both sides richer when people do feel free to say a few things. No pressure, just don't feel too restricted as long as you're not letting me know where the KB is hiding!
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: obvert
This is a bit worrisome, but if I can get some more CVEs into play here, maybe I can get enough cover to challenge. Doesn't look like a lot of CV/CVE here. All of this disappeared the next day.

Just a bit? [:)]

What makes you think it is just the mini-kb? Interpreting these search results seems like a black science to me.

It is a bit of voodoo, this search/recon interpretation. [;)]

I only have this feeling because it wasn't too long ago that Truant torpedoed Kaga off the coast of Sumatra, and after that I got a whiff of some big stuff over there again with the Mutsu message and meeting. I think he has to worry more about a landing on Ceylon than in the Marshalls, especially since he doesn't know where the bulk of my CVs are hiding.

There have been some BBs in the area, and this Mini-KB has been somewhat consistent in it's rollover readings when it's in range. Always between 40-55 fighters and 30-45 bombers. That seems like three CVL/CVE to me. If I can get 5 CVE into play with Wasp, I might be able to handle that one. Not that I'm going to seek anything out, but I do want to see what he's going to do here.

In about 5-7 days I'd like to start seeing if I can move forward again, but I'll get all of the subs off of transport duty and start making it really hard not to run into them out here in the big open ocean.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
paullus99
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 10:00 am

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by paullus99 »

It seems to me that you've accomplished quite a bit in the Pacific without the need to risk invaluable assets - so there wouldn't be a point in engaging him on anything like unfavorable or even equal terms at this point....if you can get him to keep jetting around the world, burning fuel while you disappear back into the shadows, its a net-win for you.
Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: paullus99

It seems to me that you've accomplished quite a bit in the Pacific without the need to risk invaluable assets - so there wouldn't be a point in engaging him on anything like unfavorable or even equal terms at this point....if you can get him to keep jetting around the world, burning fuel while you disappear back into the shadows, its a net-win for you.

I agree. The biggest goal should be now to move onto New Guinea from the islands that I've got nearby and continue up the island chains I've got footholds on already. Once established there it's not as necessary to even have air cover from the fleet.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

[font="Times New Roman"]Nov 26 - 28, 1942[/font]
[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]INDIA: [/font] After a period of healing and consolidation I've decided to move again in India. The goal this time will be to take the remainder of the Southern tip and to quickly build these bases to support a later invasion of Ceylon. I'll asses the possibility of taking Madras back as well, but that will depend on whether Nick has built massive forts there and wants to try to hold using them. I'll have to get a good read on the place soon. I don't trust the recon I'm getting now which shows only about 17k troops there.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]CENT PAC: [/font] I'll hit Nauru for a while and see how much it can be softened up. P-38s will sweep nearly every turn. The IJN fleet has moved back the the shadows, which in this case is more than 19 hexes from Ocean Island's PBY group.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]SO PAC: [/font] Rossel Island gets some more engineers and base forces and should build a port and a field within the next week. I unfortunately didn't LR CAP two xAKL dropping supply at Debone, and 9 Netties boldly flew in and sunk them.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]CHINA: [/font] Nick has brought in lots of Oscars and one Tojo IIb group to China, and these effectively close off opportunities for LR CAP over troops. The troops at Kweiyang get pummeled for a few days and then the first DA comes in at a 1:1 with a huge amount of tanks attacking here. It also knocks a fort off immediately, which is very different than the situation that developed at Chikhiang, and this looks like it'll be untenable now. I'll have to wait and look for an opportunity to move these units back soon. Giving up more ground way too quickly.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]OZ:[/font] Troops are about a third of the way to Kalgoorlie.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]SIGINT:[/font] Doesn't this show up at Wake? Is it moving out?

[font="Trebuchet MS"]17/Wake Coastal Gun Battalion is loaded on xAK Terushima Maru moving to Wake Island.[/font]

[font="Trebuchet MS"]--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Nov 26, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Deboyne Islands at 103,135

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid spotted at 39 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 13 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 9

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
xAKL Noora, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
xAKL Oorama, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 45cm Type 91 Torp

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Nov 2, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Morning Air attack on Kweiyang , at 74,49

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 24 NM, estimated altitude 24,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIb Oscar x 27

Allied aircraft
P-66 Vanguard x 3
P-40K Warhawk x 5

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
P-66 Vanguard: 1 destroyed
P-40K Warhawk: 1 destroyed


Aircraft Attacking:
27 x Ki-43-IIb Oscar sweeping at 20000 feet

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Kweiyang (74,49)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 27194 troops, 471 guns, 2146 vehicles, Assault Value = 1406

Defending force 47946 troops, 239 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1294

Japanese adjusted assault: 833

Allied adjusted defense: 685

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 3)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), disruption(-), preparation(-)
experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
646 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 32 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 34 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Vehicles lost 83 (5 destroyed, 78 disabled)


Allied ground losses:
1814 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 218 disabled

Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 28 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled
Guns lost 15 (2 destroyed, 13 disabled)

Assaulting units:
12th Tank Regiment
19th Tank Regiment
1st Tank Division
7th Ind.Tank Brigade
2nd Tank Division
15th Tank Regiment
17th Tank Regiment
18th Tank Regiment
4th Tank Regiment
11th Tank Regiment
13th Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
Guards Tank Division
23rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
21st Mortar Battalion
11th Army
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
30th Chinese Corps
71st Chinese Corps
35th Chinese Corps
78th Chinese Corps
Central Reserve

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[/font]

Image
[font="Trebuchet MS"]These are the bases I'll shoot for next. All unoccupied, but quite close to a lot of big airfields and in clear hexes. [/font]
Attachments
Screenshot..12.13.46.jpg
Screenshot..12.13.46.jpg (739.65 KiB) Viewed 418 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

[font="Times New Roman"]The Long Walk[/font]
Still a ways to go!!

Not much showing over at Esperance, and Kalgoorlie is still pretty barren with one unit and a few recon planes.

Image
Attachments
SWOZ.jpg
SWOZ.jpg (738.57 KiB) Viewed 418 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by obvert »

[font="Times New Roman"]Nov 29 - Dec 1, 1942[/font]
[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]INDIA: [/font] In India the next phase of action began with para-drops on the vacant Cocanada and Viz. These bases offer opportunities for much better area search for PBY groups, but are vulnerable to bombardments. Sub laid mines are en route already and PT boats will take up here once the bases can afford them and there are some available. In the next few days more paras will take the remaining four empty bases near the tip of India. Engineers, base forces and AA are railing in.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]CENT PAC: [/font] A few small hits no Nauru by B-17s get some damage on the base. Some more naval bombardments will go in soon. He likes to pop in fighters here, and we've got the P-38s sweeping from Abemama.

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]CHINA: [/font] The Japanese come right back with another big attack at Kweiyang on the 29th and come coder to getting a 2:1. They again knock out 200+ Chinese infantry disabled while taking minimal losses. The only hope here is that the supply would flow only intermittently, and this seems to be the case as there were no attacks on the 30th or the 1st! So our troops began moving out and should make it without further difficulties on the 2nd. They'll be overstacked in two different hexes, but only for 1-2 turns as forces reconfigure. Now the difficult stage.

Can we keep them away from Chungking for long enough?

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"]SIGINT:[/font] This unit has been reported to load up and leave Perth. Is it back? Or did some elements get left behind?

[font="Trebuchet MS"]12/Imperial Guards Division is located at Perth(49,147).[/font]

[font="Trebuchet MS"]--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Nov 29, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Kweiyang (74,49)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 26598 troops, 471 guns, 2142 vehicles, Assault Value = 1321

Defending force 42769 troops, 237 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1072

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 334

Allied adjusted defense: 261

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: supply(-)

Japanese ground losses:
455 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 30 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 47 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Vehicles lost 77 (5 destroyed, 72 disabled)


Allied ground losses:
2584 casualties reported
Squads: 10 destroyed, 214 disabled

Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled


Assaulting units:
17th Tank Regiment
1st Tank Division
13th Tank Regiment
15th Tank Regiment
12th Tank Regiment
2nd Tank Division
7th Ind.Tank Brigade
19th Tank Regiment
11th Tank Regiment
4th Tank Regiment
18th Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
Guards Tank Division
23rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
21st Mortar Battalion
11th Army
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
30th Chinese Corps
71st Chinese Corps
35th Chinese Corps
78th Chinese Corps

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Nov 30, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Nauru Island , at 127,128

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid detected at 23 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 14

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 3 damaged

Airbase hits 1
Runway hits 7

Aircraft Attacking:
11 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 12000 feet
Airfield Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 12000 feet
Airfield Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Nauru Island , at 127,128

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid detected at 32 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 9

No Japanese losses

No Allied losses

Airbase hits 3
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 12

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 12000 feet
Airfield Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Dec 1, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Vizagapatnam (42,37)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 58 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 6

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Allied adjusted assault: 7

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 7 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Vizagapatnam !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-)

Assaulting units:
77th LRP Bde /1


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Cocanada (41,37)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 58 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 6

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Allied adjusted assault: 7

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 7 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Cocanada !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-)

Assaulting units:
111th LRP Bde /1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[/font]


[font="Trebuchet MS"]What does plus 8, -8 mean in the air losses screen?[/font]

Image
Attachments
air.jpg
air.jpg (553.66 KiB) Viewed 418 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by Lowpe »

I think it means you sent planes back to the pools. More than you lost.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by crsutton »

Have you upgraded all your American infantry units to the 42 squads that came on in July? I am just starting the process. Even with decent experience it is amazing how tough it is for Allied units in 1942 to fight Japanese units on a 1-1 basis. I can now see how Japanese tanks are so fierce in 42 because Allied squads have such pitiful AT values. The American squads get 25% more firepower in mid 42 (garand rifle, I suppose) and their AT value goes from 15 to 35 (first bazookas). However all Commonwealth squads remain very weak until 1943, when their anti tank values go from 5 to around 75. (God bless the piat). 1943 really sees the scales turn. It can't come fast enough for me...
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
veji1
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:28 pm

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by veji1 »

Whatever happens I must say I loved this campaign in China. Seeing a real campaign, tough, painful for both players, costly for the japanese, etc. is really a nice thing to see. Kudos on your resistance so far.
Adieu Ô Dieu odieux... signé Adam
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I think it means you sent planes back to the pools. More than you lost.
Right - the +8 is the balance in the inventory after the returned aircraft arrive, and the -8 is under the "Used so far" column, the negative value being the opposite of being used ; i.e. returned.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: ::Felix, Ferdinand and FRUPAC:: obvert (A) v Greyjoy (J)

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I think it means you sent planes back to the pools. More than you lost.
Right - the +8 is the balance in the inventory after the returned aircraft arrive, and the -8 is under the "Used so far" column, the negative value being the opposite of being used ; i.e. returned.

I'm not so sure. It's in the "air to air losses" section.


...maybe you had 8 defectors? [:D]
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”