At Chengchow, the Chinese choose Blitzkrieg to force the first loss to be an Arm unit, i.e. the General. They are unlucky when the attack causes no losses to either side but leaves the attackers disorganised (8 on +4). One of these days I'm going to come a right cropper unless I remember to check the odds before committing to the attacks.
The German assault on Kiel doesn't start well (fractional not made) and results in the loss of CW II Inf for the German loss of XII SS Mot and XL Mech (9 at +6). They could have taken another Inf loss but doing so would leave a hex with only the 5-point, disorganised Art on it. If they tried, the CW could get a reasonable odds assault and widen the bridgehead. It would mean them also making a combined, rather than the preferred naval move but too good to miss and not worth the risk for the Germans.
The Japanese choose Blitzkrieg for the attack on Stilwell. The roll isn't good (9) but at +13 it's enough to carry the day. The resulting breakthrough puts the Nationalist 3rd Mech OOS.
The Japanese assault against the one AA gun goes horribly and it's only the good starting odds that keep losses down to 1 disorganised Militia (2 at +20).
Finally, the assault (chosen by China) on Tientsin. It starts well for the Japanese (fractional made). It then goes pear shaped. The Japanese destroy the defender but lose both attackers, including Yamamoto (9 at +7). Retrospectively looking at the odds, there was always too much chance of losing 2 units. I shouldn't have tried that.
Northern China post battles.
