Were the atomic bombs necessary

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
msieving1
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:24 am
Location: Missouri

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by msieving1 »

ORIGINAL: Orm

I do not understand why it is relevant if the bombs were necessary or not. Neither do I understand the relevance of the argument that the bomb saved lives, or not.

To me it depends on how war crimes are, or were, defined.

Whether or not an action constitutes a war crime is very dependent on the military necessity of the action and whether the action causes more or fewer deaths than alternatives.
That Russia brings this up now has more to do with the current political situation and the possibility of NATO expanding.

Well, yeah. Obviously.
-- Mark Sieving
User avatar
msieving1
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:24 am
Location: Missouri

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by msieving1 »

ORIGINAL: Reaper

But to witp-ae:
How many people on the allied side have used the bombs to gain victory here and how many have not --- I wonder if modern perspectives on what is considered a war crime actually changes the way we play the end game.

In the games, the atomic bombs simply aren't very effective, and using them shifts the level of victory in Japan's favor. The design of the game makes using atomic bombs a questionable decision. That has nothing to do with reality.
-- Mark Sieving
BattleMoose
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 12:16 am

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by BattleMoose »

The legality of actions in war time stem from International Treaties that belligerent nations may have signed. For the USA it includes the Geneva Conventions. While there is no court with jurisdiction, the voluntary agreements that the USA has signed in International Law serves the basis for the determination of whether actions or either legal or illegal.
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by spence »

Trials are all well and good when there is a cop in the room. When there is no cop the judge(s) can judge whatever he(they) like and the judgement is simply a piece of paper. There is(are) no cops with universal jurisdiction. The UN can play at it but there are 5 potential vetoes to it taking any action of consequence. So if the issue is more involved than declaring it to be sunny or cloudy on any particular day in any particular place the UN doesn't count for much.

The best that one can hope for in a war is that both(all) of the combatants will show some restraint.

BTW it is a pretty short list of Japanese examples of restrain during WW2 or the "China Incident".
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: mind_messing


My view is that the bombs were unneeded. The Japanese will to fight went after the news of the Soviet invasion.

You know that and historians believe that. Did HST know that at Potsdam? If so, how?
The Moose
mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

ORIGINAL: mind_messing


My view is that the bombs were unneeded. The Japanese will to fight went after the news of the Soviet invasion.

You know that and historians believe that. Did HST know that at Potsdam? If so, how?

MAGIC - the Americans had been reading the Japanese diplomatic code since before the war started.

My google-fu turned up this website. I can't vouch for the accuracy of any of it, but the author does at least provide references, which I'll chase up if I can.

http://www.doug-long.com/hiroshim.htm

The quote in question

July 11: "make clear to Russia... We have no intention of annexing or taking possession of the areas which we have been occupying as a result of the war; we hope to terminate the war".

July 12: "it is His Majesty's heart's desire to see the swift termination of the war".

July 13: "I sent Ando, Director of the Bureau of Political Affairs to communicate to the [Soviet] Ambassador that His Majesty desired to dispatch Prince Konoye as special envoy, carrying with him the personal letter of His Majesty stating the Imperial wish to end the war" (for above items, see: U.S. Dept. of State, Potsdam 1, pg. 873-879).

July 18: "Negotiations... necessary... for soliciting Russia's good offices in concluding the war and also in improving the basis for negotiations with England and America." (Magic-Diplomatic Summary, 7/18/45, Records of the National Security Agency, Magic Files, RG 457, Box 18, National Archives).

July 22: "Special Envoy Konoye's mission will be in obedience to the Imperial Will. He will request assistance in bringing about an end to the war through the good offices of the Soviet Government." The July 21st communication from Togo also noted that a conference between the Emperor's emissary, Prince Konoye, and the Soviet Union, was sought, in preparation for contacting the U.S. and Great Britain (Magic-Diplomatic Summary, 7/22/45, Records of the National Security Agency, Magic Files, RG 457, Box 18, National Archives).

July 25: "it is impossible to accept unconditional surrender under any circumstances, but we should like to communicate to the other party through appropriate channels that we have no objection to a peace based on the Atlantic Charter." (U.S. Dept. of State, Potsdam 2, pg. 1260 - 1261).

July 26: Japan's Ambassador to Moscow, Sato, to the Soviet Acting Commissar for Foreign Affairs, Lozovsky: "The aim of the Japanese Government with regard to Prince Konoye's mission is to enlist the good offices of the Soviet Government in order to end the war." (Magic-Diplomatic Summary, 7/26/45, Records of the National Security Agency, Magic Files, RG 457, Box 18, National Archives).

President Truman knew of the messages' content, noting, for instance, in his diary on July 18, "Stalin had told P.M. [Prime Minister Churchill] of telegram from Jap [sic] Emperor asking for peace" (Robert Ferrell, ed., Off the Record - the Private Papers of Harry S. Truman, pg. 53).

User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

ORIGINAL: mind_messing


My view is that the bombs were unneeded. The Japanese will to fight went after the news of the Soviet invasion.

You know that and historians believe that. Did HST know that at Potsdam? If so, how?

MAGIC - the Americans had been reading the Japanese diplomatic code since before the war started.

My google-fu turned up this website. I can't vouch for the accuracy of any of it, but the author does at least provide references, which I'll chase up if I can.

http://www.doug-long.com/hiroshim.htm

The quote in question

July 11: "make clear to Russia... We have no intention of annexing or taking possession of the areas which we have been occupying as a result of the war; we hope to terminate the war".

July 12: "it is His Majesty's heart's desire to see the swift termination of the war".

July 13: "I sent Ando, Director of the Bureau of Political Affairs to communicate to the [Soviet] Ambassador that His Majesty desired to dispatch Prince Konoye as special envoy, carrying with him the personal letter of His Majesty stating the Imperial wish to end the war" (for above items, see: U.S. Dept. of State, Potsdam 1, pg. 873-879).

July 18: "Negotiations... necessary... for soliciting Russia's good offices in concluding the war and also in improving the basis for negotiations with England and America." (Magic-Diplomatic Summary, 7/18/45, Records of the National Security Agency, Magic Files, RG 457, Box 18, National Archives).

July 22: "Special Envoy Konoye's mission will be in obedience to the Imperial Will. He will request assistance in bringing about an end to the war through the good offices of the Soviet Government." The July 21st communication from Togo also noted that a conference between the Emperor's emissary, Prince Konoye, and the Soviet Union, was sought, in preparation for contacting the U.S. and Great Britain (Magic-Diplomatic Summary, 7/22/45, Records of the National Security Agency, Magic Files, RG 457, Box 18, National Archives).

July 25: "it is impossible to accept unconditional surrender under any circumstances, but we should like to communicate to the other party through appropriate channels that we have no objection to a peace based on the Atlantic Charter." (U.S. Dept. of State, Potsdam 2, pg. 1260 - 1261).

July 26: Japan's Ambassador to Moscow, Sato, to the Soviet Acting Commissar for Foreign Affairs, Lozovsky: "The aim of the Japanese Government with regard to Prince Konoye's mission is to enlist the good offices of the Soviet Government in order to end the war." (Magic-Diplomatic Summary, 7/26/45, Records of the National Security Agency, Magic Files, RG 457, Box 18, National Archives).

President Truman knew of the messages' content, noting, for instance, in his diary on July 18, "Stalin had told P.M. [Prime Minister Churchill] of telegram from Jap [sic] Emperor asking for peace" (Robert Ferrell, ed., Off the Record - the Private Papers of Harry S. Truman, pg. 53).

HST knew about the Sato cable and the others, yes. But their content was not the same as an open declaration that Japan was going to unconditionally surrender. This is the crux. The July 25 content above shows their position had not really changed in years.

McCullough, in "Truman", relates the Potsdam conference in great detail. On the evening (Europe time) the Trinity success was top-lined to HST, Stalin had reiterated that the USSR would enter against Japan as agreed at Yalta. He named a mid-August date. The next day a more complete secret cable offered more details of the test. After the formal session that day Truman spoke alone to Churchill. McCullough writes:

"They talked of the war in the Pacific and Churchill pondered whether new wording might be devised so that the Japanese could surrender and yet salvage some sense of their military honor. Truman countered by saying he did not think the Japanese had any military honor, not after Pearl Harbor. Churchill said that 'at any rate they had something for which they were ready to face certain death in very large numbers, and this might not be so important to us as it was to them.' At this Truman turned 'quite sympathetic,' as Churchill recounted, and began talking of 'the terrible responsibilities upon him in regard to unlimited effusion of American blood.' 'He invited personal friendship and comradeship,' Churchill wrote. 'He seems a man of exceptional character . . .'"

After this meeting Truman called alone on Stalin, accompanied by Byrnes and Bohlen. At that meeting Stalin showed the Sato cable, which Truman already had read. Still, he was impressed with Stalin's openness. "It might be best, said Stalin, to 'lull the Japanese to sleep.'" Truman said he would leave the response to the Sato cable up to Stalin. Thus indicating he had already most likely made a decision on Manhattan.

The conference continued with Churchill making increasingly long-winded speeches and Truman growing exasperated. He wanted decisions, not speeches. Most of the content of the conference dealt with Germany, Italy, the zones inherent in Europe, and other non-Japanese issues. To the Soviets and UK the war was essentially already over. After the Battle of Berlin Stalin seemed to view the coming war in the east as a minor operation more or less. The British really had no part to play with the Home Islands.

Truman wrote "I'm not going to stay around this terrible place all summer just to listen to speeches." In a letter to Bess he said Stalin's agreement to join against Japan was what he had come for, and he had it. But in his diary he wrote "Believe Japs will fold up before Russia comes in. I am sure they will when Manhattan appears over their homeland."

The issue was decided as far as Truman was concerned. And his vote was the only one that mattered.

Again, the cable stack you posted above shows that Japan well-understood the terms available. They didn't like them. They were looking for a way to weasel out of the situation they had placed themselves in. But Truman was far more worried about what Stalin could and would do in the east than Japan's problems. In some ways he was an excellent leader because he didn't complicate uncomplicated things. Japan could have avoided the Bomb by surrendering, before July, in July, or in the time between Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Anything else is just a waste of logic.

The Moose
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by geofflambert »

So, it's agreed then, Justin Bieber should be our guest at Guantanamo. Unless Canada will accept him back. I think there's a black site in Windsor where they could put him, and tickle his feet or something like that.

User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

So, it's agreed then, Justin Bieber should be our guest at Guantanamo. Unless Canada will accept him back. I think there's a black site in Windsor where they could put him, and tickle his feet or something like that.
Sure you jest - Bieber would ruin Guantanamo's reputation!
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by geofflambert »

Well, look at the up side. He might convert all those terrorists there to merely be hooligans, though I doubt they could hold their own against British soccer hooligans.

mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: mind_messing

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58




You know that and historians believe that. Did HST know that at Potsdam? If so, how?

MAGIC - the Americans had been reading the Japanese diplomatic code since before the war started.

My google-fu turned up this website. I can't vouch for the accuracy of any of it, but the author does at least provide references, which I'll chase up if I can.

http://www.doug-long.com/hiroshim.htm

The quote in question

July 11: "make clear to Russia... We have no intention of annexing or taking possession of the areas which we have been occupying as a result of the war; we hope to terminate the war".

July 12: "it is His Majesty's heart's desire to see the swift termination of the war".

July 13: "I sent Ando, Director of the Bureau of Political Affairs to communicate to the [Soviet] Ambassador that His Majesty desired to dispatch Prince Konoye as special envoy, carrying with him the personal letter of His Majesty stating the Imperial wish to end the war" (for above items, see: U.S. Dept. of State, Potsdam 1, pg. 873-879).

July 18: "Negotiations... necessary... for soliciting Russia's good offices in concluding the war and also in improving the basis for negotiations with England and America." (Magic-Diplomatic Summary, 7/18/45, Records of the National Security Agency, Magic Files, RG 457, Box 18, National Archives).

July 22: "Special Envoy Konoye's mission will be in obedience to the Imperial Will. He will request assistance in bringing about an end to the war through the good offices of the Soviet Government." The July 21st communication from Togo also noted that a conference between the Emperor's emissary, Prince Konoye, and the Soviet Union, was sought, in preparation for contacting the U.S. and Great Britain (Magic-Diplomatic Summary, 7/22/45, Records of the National Security Agency, Magic Files, RG 457, Box 18, National Archives).

July 25: "it is impossible to accept unconditional surrender under any circumstances, but we should like to communicate to the other party through appropriate channels that we have no objection to a peace based on the Atlantic Charter." (U.S. Dept. of State, Potsdam 2, pg. 1260 - 1261).

July 26: Japan's Ambassador to Moscow, Sato, to the Soviet Acting Commissar for Foreign Affairs, Lozovsky: "The aim of the Japanese Government with regard to Prince Konoye's mission is to enlist the good offices of the Soviet Government in order to end the war." (Magic-Diplomatic Summary, 7/26/45, Records of the National Security Agency, Magic Files, RG 457, Box 18, National Archives).

President Truman knew of the messages' content, noting, for instance, in his diary on July 18, "Stalin had told P.M. [Prime Minister Churchill] of telegram from Jap [sic] Emperor asking for peace" (Robert Ferrell, ed., Off the Record - the Private Papers of Harry S. Truman, pg. 53).

Again, the cable stack you posted above shows that Japan well-understood the terms available. They didn't like them. They were looking for a way to weasel out of the situation they had placed themselves in. But Truman was far more worried about what Stalin could and would do in the east than Japan's problems. In some ways he was an excellent leader because he didn't complicate uncomplicated things. Japan could have avoided the Bomb by surrendering, before July, in July, or in the time between Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Anything else is just a waste of logic.


That's the crux. The American insistence on no surrender other than unconditional surrender was demanding for the Japanese, and they weren't going to consider it as an option so long as the possibility existed that the Soviets could get them a better deal.

The role of the USSR is confounded by the self-serving role their diplomacy played in giving the Japanese false hope. Would a simple statement that the USSR wouldn't be interested in helping Japan with negotations have a strong enough effect, or would an all-out declaration of war be required? I'd tend to think the latter - which would have more of an impact in the IJA officer corps - the group that had the most sway over the Japanese government.

Excuse the short post: I had a big long reply, but the fourm ate it.

User avatar
Bo Rearguard
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:08 pm
Location: Basement of the Alamo

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by Bo Rearguard »

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

The role of the USSR is confounded by the self-serving role their diplomacy played in giving the Japanese false hope. Would a simple statement that the USSR wouldn't be interested in helping Japan with negotations have a strong enough effect, or would an all-out declaration of war be required? I'd tend to think the latter - which would have more of an impact in the IJA officer corps - the group that had the most sway over the Japanese government.


I don't see why they would. Ambassador Sato in Moscow was repeatedly assured by the Soviet Foreign Minister, Molotov that Russo-Japanese relations and the future of the two countries' neutrality pact, had nothing to do with the Western Allies. This deceit was eagerly swallowed by Tokyo. Japan sought Russian goodwill to prop up its creaking empire at exactly the moment that Stalin secretly committed himself to kicking those ramshackle props away. The Russians were quite conscious of the growing American ambivalence toward their participation in the Pacific War and therefore possessed the strongest interest in ensuring that Japan kept fighting by keeping the door cracked open and offering some crumbs of hope. If Tokyo somehow made peace with Washington before Stalin shifted his armies to the Manchurian border and was ready to declare war, the Americans might back out on the rewards promised at Yalta. So, to play for time, Russian diplomats kept telling the Japanese fairy tales, and in their impossible position the Japanese kept believing them.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist ...." Union General John Sedgwick, 1864
jmalter
Posts: 1673
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 5:41 pm

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by jmalter »

At the time (June/July '45) the IJ 'war cabinet' was composed of the PM, the Foreign Minister, the Army & Navy ministers, & the Army & Navy Chiefs-of-Staff. Of these 6, 4 were serving officers, & only the FM could credibly be described as 'pro-peace'. The military members were all committed to a last-ditch defense of the Home Islands, desiring to prove to the US that military conquest of Japan would prove unacceptably costly to the US.

The IJ had essentially decided to defend southern Kyushu as a huge Okinawa-style battle, whose success would be measured by the casualties inflicted on the invading US forces, regardless of the cost. I don't think that anyone in this discussion would disagree that the Olympic invasion of Kyushu would have been horrific. Kyushu was loaded for bear, & the US was bringing its A-game.

Amb. Sato was probably more aware of Russian intentions than his superiors at the IJ FM. Russia had already notified Japan that their neutrality pact would not be renewed, IJ Army commanders could not have been unaware of their weak position in Manchukuo, given that they'd spent the last 3 years drawing down their forces there in order to reinforce their defenses against the US' Pacific-theater advance. Surely some few IJ Army planners were aware of the Soviet Army's combat power in 1945, & could recall the 'pre-war' debacle of Nomonhan. Japanese diplomats were still active in Russia, and sent reports of streams of military trains traveling east along the trans-Siberian railroad (see Frank, 'Downfall').

While the Allies were conferring at Potsdam, Amb. Sato repeatedly advised his government that its ill-defined plan to send an Imperial diplomatic mission to Moscow would have no influence on Soviet intentions. He knew that Japan had neither the economic concessions nor diplomatic geld to influence the Soviet government. Sato knew his job & was probably the least surprised of anyone, when he rec'd the Russian declaration of war.

As far as anyone believing what they'd heard from Molotov, well, by 1945 that was an 'orrid thin straw to grasp. One might almost feel sorry for those who'd believed that his diplomacy was anything other than warfare by other means. Those who had were already mostly dead, or marked for death.

It'd be almost amusing, if it wasn't so depressing, to read statements like m_m's plaint, "The role of the USSR is confounded by the self-serving role their diplomacy played in giving the Japanese false hope. Would a simple statement that the USSR wouldn't be interested in helping Japan with negotations have a strong enough effect, or would an all-out declaration of war be required?"

In what world are diplomatic communications meant to be other than self-serving? The world under discussion is 1945, & the communicants are both major combatants, Russia is poised to do serious dirt to Japan. Are they gonna telegraph their intentions, or are they gonna pretend that they're not getting ever closer to knocking you over?

In addition, there's nothing I've read that indicates the USSR was willing to accept the IJ diplomatic initiative. Soviet diplomatic response was solely passive, at most it requested clarification of the IJ representative's ability to make a deal. Given the US' proven ability to read coded Japanese diplomatic communications (MAGIC) in near real-time, & probable ability to read Soviet comms, nothing I've read gives any indication that the USSR gave IJ any reason to speculate that their 'iniative' would have resulted in any diplomatic activity towards ending the war. Any 'hope' involved was purely of the IJ's imagination.

On the other hand, we have the Potsdam Declaration of 26 July 45, promising "The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction." I will note that the Soviet declaration of war, & subsequent invasions, began on 8-9 Aug 45, concurrent w/ the atom-bombing of Nagasaki, after the previous atom-bombing of Hiroshima. Frank states that Stalin personally ordered his armies to attack Japan 1 week in advance of their planned dates, reacting to the attack on Hiroshima.

I'd like to note that the Potsdam Declaration was not an 'unconditional' surrender, but defined the Allied (US, British & Chinese) terms for Japan's surrender. The only subsequent notable change in the surrender documents signed in Tokyo Bay, was that the Imperial system could continue to exist under the governance of SCAP (MacArthur's military occupation), & that its continued existence would be subject to a popular referendum.

I don't see exactly how this discussion devolved from the OP's link to a 'US should be charged w/ war-crimes for atom-bombing Japan' moan from from the Speaker of the Russian Duma, a politico whose main objective is to get in the way of Ukraine's effort to defend itself from Russian separatism & annexation. 'S true, that the end of WWII involved some prompt & utter destruction that continues to disturb our minds to this day.

Yet lately, the most recent posts here posit the idea that the Russians should've been more up-front w/ the Japanese wrt the Soviet military threat, suddenly it's the Sov's fault that IJ command didn't see the writing on the wall.

I sign on to the revulsion against nuclear warfare, and support the various START treaties that resulted, in no small part, from the European protests against the Reaganite deployment of the Pershing II missiles.

But it's damn' amusing to read here, the insinuation that IJ could've avoided nuclear attack in August '45, if only the Sovs had been more honest. That's quite a turnaround from the OP's link!
BattleMoose
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 12:16 am

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by BattleMoose »

Yet lately, the most recent posts here posit the idea that the Russians should've been more up-front w/ the Japanese wrt the Soviet military threat, suddenly it's the Sov's fault that IJ command didn't see the writing on the wall.

I don't think anyone has posited that the Russians should have behaved anyway other than they did. But rather have argued that the Soviet promise of a negotiated peace was in fact, keeping Japan in the war.

We have two incredibly impactful events happening days before their surrender, Soviet invasion and Atomic bombs dropping. In truth the, damage the atomic bombs caused was very comparable to conventional bombing raids.

But it was the Soviet invasion that finally made it clear that there was no other option for Japan but unconditional surrender.

Maybe the USA just had to wait for the Soviet invasion, not drop the bombs, and see Japan capitulate. Or even combined with some blockade. Speculation.
mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by mind_messing »

Yet lately, the most recent posts here posit the idea that the Russians should've been more up-front w/ the Japanese wrt the Soviet military threat, suddenly it's the Sov's fault that IJ command didn't see the writing on the wall.

But it's damn' amusing to read here, the insinuation that IJ could've avoided nuclear attack in August '45, if only the Sovs had been more honest. That's quite a turnaround from the OP's link!

I had written a nice long post on the Soviet role in prolonging the Japanese surrender, but it was swallowed by the forum.

Yes, diplomacy is self-serving. The Russians were quite happy to entertain notions of Japanese negotations in order to keep them in the war and to let Stalin get a slice of the cake in Asia.

I wasn't being critical of Russian diplomacy: Molotov had the interests of his own nation as first priority, and he furthered them to a great degree in his dealings with the Japanese.

There are three facts regarding Japanese diplomacy prior to the atomic bombs being dropped:

1. The government was willing to surrender on negotated terms.
2. The Americans were only going to accept unconditional surrender.
3. The Soviets acting as intermediates represented the last chance they had of surrendering under terms.

ORIGINAL: BattleMoose
Yet lately, the most recent posts here posit the idea that the Russians should've been more up-front w/ the Japanese wrt the Soviet military threat, suddenly it's the Sov's fault that IJ command didn't see the writing on the wall.

I don't think anyone has posited that the Russians should have behaved anyway other than they did. But rather have argued that the Soviet promise of a negotiated peace was in fact, keeping Japan in the war.

We have two incredibly impactful events happening days before their surrender, Soviet invasion and Atomic bombs dropping. In truth the, damage the atomic bombs caused was very comparable to conventional bombing raids.

But it was the Soviet invasion that finally made it clear that there was no other option for Japan but unconditional surrender.

Maybe the USA just had to wait for the Soviet invasion, not drop the bombs, and see Japan capitulate. Or even combined with some blockade. Speculation.

Yes, this is a clearer articulation of my thoughts.
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

There are three facts regarding Japanese diplomacy prior to the atomic bombs being dropped:

1. The government was willing to surrender on negotated terms.
2. The Americans were only going to accept unconditional surrender.
3. The Soviets acting as intermediates represented the last chance they had of surrendering under terms.

That is an acceptable distillation of the situation so long as one understands the importance of the three is not 33% each. #2 is more like 99.9%. HST had no duty to Soviet territorial aims nor did he have a duty to the Japanese people. He, like Lincoln, was elected on a wartime ticket, and after the Casablanca conference. The American people knew what they were doing. And it is clear from the sources I quoted, primarily Truman and Churchill's diaries, that they saw the surrender in quite different terms. (As did Stalin.) As I said up-thread, Europeans at the time did not understand the effect of Pearl Harbor on the diplomatic system in play in 1945. Not even the PM who should have known better.
The Moose
Amoral
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:17 am

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by Amoral »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

There are three facts regarding Japanese diplomacy prior to the atomic bombs being dropped:

1. The government was willing to surrender on negotated terms.
2. The Americans were only going to accept unconditional surrender.
3. The Soviets acting as intermediates represented the last chance they had of surrendering under terms.

That is an acceptable distillation of the situation so long as one understands the importance of the three is not 33% each. #2 is more like 99.9%. HST had no duty to Soviet territorial aims nor did he have a duty to the Japanese people. He, like Lincoln, was elected on a wartime ticket, and after the Casablanca conference. The American people knew what they were doing. And it is clear from the sources I quoted, primarily Truman and Churchill's diaries, that they saw the surrender in quite different terms. (As did Stalin.) As I said up-thread, Europeans at the time did not understand the effect of Pearl Harbor on the diplomatic system in play in 1945. Not even the PM who should have known better.


If there was a moral obligation to avoid the bombings by negotiating a peace, the Allies can't get out of that obligation by saying "I don't want to and I don't have to". The mood of the nation does not alter what is and what is not moral.

That's a big if, though.




User avatar
Symon
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:59 pm
Location: De Eye-lands, Mon

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by Symon »

Up on the hill; They’ve got time to burn;
There’s no return;
Double helix in the sky tonight;
Throw out the hardware, let’s do it right;
Aja;
When all my dime dancing is through:
I run to you..”mu”

Up on the hill; They think I’m ok;
Or so they say;
Chinese music always sets me free;
Angular banjoes; Sound good to me;
Aja;
When all my dime dancing is through:
I run to you..”mu”
Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6417
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by JeffroK »

He's finally cracked[:'(]
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: We're the atomic bombs necessary

Post by rustysi »

Finally????[:D]
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”