Extra Pz Army in '44

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3

Post Reply
mooreshawnm
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:18 am

Extra Pz Army in '44

Post by mooreshawnm »

So playing the '43 scenario and called off Citadel. Spent '43 to '44 retreating to shorter and more
defensible lines. The armor conducted numerous 'back hand blow' counter offensives during the retreat.
June of '44 and the lines are The Daugava River, Dnepr River, Ingul River. Only areas of concern are the
gap between the Daugava and the Dnepr where the 3rd Pz Army is fighting and the bridgehead over the Dnepr
between Cherkassy and Kirovgrad where the 1st Pz Army is engaged. While I am fighting the AI and realize
a human would be all over me I am not convinced the Germans couldn't have done this and been better off for
it.

I digress...4th Pz Army, currently sitting near Brest (so they can react either n or s of the swamps) has
6 Pz divisions and 3 PzGr divisions fully rested, supplied and at full strength. They aren't currently needed
anywhere.

My questions:

1) Did the Germans have the rail capacity to move 9 mech divisions, 3 corps and an army (in addition to all
the other troop movement going on after D-Day) to either a) Normandy or b) Italy?

2) If the rail capacity existed was it possible to move these troops to either front without being destroyed
by air power?

3) Would an additional 9 mech divisions be able to be supplied in either Normandy or Italy?

4) Would this number of divisions made a decisive difference in either theater?

5) Should I forget this nonsense, move them south to counter attack the inevitable Soviet breakthrough across
the Ingul?

(This scenario has been a blast...started on .08 and switched to .0802b around Jan '44)
User avatar
heliodorus04
Posts: 1653
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 5:11 pm
Location: Nashville TN

RE: Extra Pz Army in '44

Post by heliodorus04 »

ORIGINAL: mooreshawnm

So playing the '43 scenario and called off Citadel. Spent '43 to '44 retreating to shorter and more
defensible lines. The armor conducted numerous 'back hand blow' counter offensives during the retreat.
June of '44 and the lines are The Daugava River, Dnepr River, Ingul River. Only areas of concern are the
gap between the Daugava and the Dnepr where the 3rd Pz Army is fighting and the bridgehead over the Dnepr
between Cherkassy and Kirovgrad where the 1st Pz Army is engaged. While I am fighting the AI and realize
a human would be all over me I am not convinced the Germans couldn't have done this and been better off for
it.

I digress...4th Pz Army, currently sitting near Brest (so they can react either n or s of the swamps) has
6 Pz divisions and 3 PzGr divisions fully rested, supplied and at full strength. They aren't currently needed
anywhere.

My questions:

1) Did the Germans have the rail capacity to move 9 mech divisions, 3 corps and an army (in addition to all
the other troop movement going on after D-Day) to either a) Normandy or b) Italy?

2) If the rail capacity existed was it possible to move these troops to either front without being destroyed
by air power?

3) Would an additional 9 mech divisions be able to be supplied in either Normandy or Italy?

4) Would this number of divisions made a decisive difference in either theater?

5) Should I forget this nonsense, move them south to counter attack the inevitable Soviet breakthrough across
the Ingul?

(This scenario has been a blast...started on .08 and switched to .0802b around Jan '44)

Regarding questions that deal with hypotheticals (could these # of divisions have made a difference) - there is no better way to incite flame wars. Everyone thinks they have perfect hindsight and analysis skills. So I'm not touching the hypotheticals.

1) It is generally agreed upon that railroad capacities are too high relative to history.

2) The trains could get away from the eastern front and through to the Siegfried line without too much trouble in 44. Once they entered Eisenhower's box, though, all bets are off. We all know how air power worked on the Western Front after Eisenhower took control for the invasion/breakout.

5) Yes

Fall 2021-Playing: Stalingrad'42 (GMT); Advanced Squad Leader,
Reading: Masters of the Air (GREAT BOOK!)
Rulebooks: ASL (always ASL), Middle-Earth Strategy Battle Game
Painting: WHFB Lizardmen leaders
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Extra Pz Army in '44

Post by morvael »

You could try to play this out using WitW, by withdrawing those units you have in reserve in WitE from EF Box in WitW. No doubt your East Front would collapse soon, but at least you would know the answer for 1), 2), 3) and 4) - in the reality of WitW that is. No one knows what would happen in real life, if the Germans would try it.

edit: meanwhile, in your game, proceed to 5).
vandorenp
Posts: 1028
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:57 am
Location: Suffolk, VA
Contact:

RE: Extra Pz Army in '44

Post by vandorenp »

Played same against human. Human Russian gave up after March 44 after failing to break Axis line and a few successful local Axis counterattacks.
Keydet
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”