14SEP41 -
Operation Thor's Hammer is moving along nicely. Weather is holding, lead elements of the battle group
have reached the outer defenses of Moscow. Follow on troops are massing in the breech for further effort
into Moscow.

Moderators: ralphtricky, JAMiAM
I don't think it needs to be on top to respond but if you'll turn on the sitrep logs we might be able to get moreORIGINAL: Cmdr_Vessery
Flak unit in question from above post. And yes, I am using the 3XBb exe with latest game version.
As you can see the flak unit has been in place for some time due to the 100% supply and
readiness.
Any ideas? Does AA have to be "on top" of the stack to respond?
ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
I don't think it needs to be on top to respond but if you'll turn on the sitrep logs we might be able to get moreORIGINAL: Cmdr_Vessery
Flak unit in question from above post. And yes, I am using the 3XBb exe with latest game version.
As you can see the flak unit has been in place for some time due to the 100% supply and
readiness.
Any ideas? Does AA have to be "on top" of the stack to respond?
detail about the battles. I seem to remember something about battles that don't really occur in the hex you
think they happen in. The AA unit may not have fired because the interception occurs in an adjacent hex
or something. We'd need the logs to know for sure. Plus an expert like Bob Cross to interpret for us.
ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
I didn't see anything in the sitrep log that explains it. Sorry about the golden goose chase. I'm not sure how to explain the AA units
lack of firing. We'll have to ask somebody who is an expert.
ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
I didn't see anything in the sitrep log that explains it. Sorry about the golden goose chase. I'm not sure how to explain the AA units
lack of firing. We'll have to ask somebody who is an expert.
ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653
I don't have anything helpful to contribute, but the unit has the AA Icon, so it shouldn't have anything to do with 3xBb or the issue that was designed to solve. I will suggest that one instance doesn't indicate an issue, someone would have to keep track of at least ten instances, preferably more.
From the TGW design standpoint, many of those AA units were included specifically for airbase defense. I've noticed that Elmer will reduce his number of airfields if AA units are in the location. Bridge attacks also.
ORIGINAL: Meyer1
I recently made a thread with the same question, in my case looks like the bombers were intercepted well before reaching the target: tm.asp?m=3804611
Edit: well, different cases, I had only fighter units in the airfield, but I see that your bombers took casualties as well. Hard to think that they took part in the "furball". Check the "toaw.log" as Klink explained to me in the other thread.
ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
I took a look at the unit and I found that it has 17 trucks when only 2 are authorized. Not that that would
make some kind of difference. I guess we'll have to ask Steve when he gets back from his vacation.