Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
chazz
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:35 pm
Location: Australia

Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by chazz »

This is practically a game-breaker for me.

The game insists upon sending my carrier bombers against Japanese carrier groups unescorted; I have tried adjusting the LR CAP and CAP %'s but still no luck.

My carrier fighters are set for ESCORT. at the same altitude as the DB's - 10000'.

It is May of '42, three CV's in the TF, with Bull Halsey in command.

I get the same result every time- all the fighters stay to protect the carrier and one or two (at most) accompany the strike wave. Needless to say my bombers are getting schwacked.


Is there some kind of secret to getting your fighters to go along on carrier strikes?
=================================
Thank you for your replies and advice!!

"If you're in a fair fight, then you didn't plan it properly" - Nick Lappos
User avatar
Mundy
Posts: 2867
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2002 6:12 am
Location: Neenah

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by Mundy »

Is it a range issue?  Bombers flying past the max fighter range?
Image
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by m10bob »

It is important to only keep 20-40% of your fighters on CAP (at the ship)..The rest are then free for escorting, but the computer also takes things into account like, time of day and if the planes already made flights earlier, or if any of the fighters are in a damaged state.
It is possible some of your pilots are casualties as well.
As mentioned above, it may also be a problem of your bombers out-ranging their own fighter escorts.
Image

User avatar
chazz
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:35 pm
Location: Australia

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by chazz »

I thought that at first, then I reset the fighter's range to correspond to both the TBD and DB group ranges. Still no luck. I smoke the incoming Jap strikes but the bombers still go on unescorted.

I'm working with a save game and I've loaded and reloaded the same battle and still the same result.
=================================
Thank you for your replies and advice!!

"If you're in a fair fight, then you didn't plan it properly" - Nick Lappos
chemkid
Posts: 1238
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:02 pm

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by chemkid »

.
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5450
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by Yaab »

Check the Air skill of the fighter group leader. My land-based sweeps as Japan notoriously failed to show up, because my leaders had their Air skill in the mid-30s.
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

Welcome back,

Follow the advice already mentioned, and remember that reloading again and again the same turn will not change outcomes; try going back 2 or 3 turns and you might see a difference
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by crsutton »

You should not have any of your carrier fighters set to LRCAP. CAP only, the rest should then fly as escort for your bombers. You do not need to set them at the exact same altitude as your bombers. I like 17,000 feet to give me a height advantage over incoming enemy attacks. Your escort will fly and adjust accordingly. I generally set my CAP to 40-60% depending on the situation. The rest of the fighters should have no assigned setting and should be set at maximum range (they area only going to fly as far as your bombers anyways). It would really help us all if you would post a screenshot or two. Three carriers in 1942 might have coordination issues as well but not usually.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
chazz
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:35 pm
Location: Australia

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by chazz »

OK....facepalm....facepalm....

I now know where I went wrong. I was confusing the LR CAP with the ESCORTS. I now understand the difference.

Thanks for your time, gents.
=================================
Thank you for your replies and advice!!

"If you're in a fair fight, then you didn't plan it properly" - Nick Lappos
User avatar
Anthropoid
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Secret Underground Lair

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by Anthropoid »

Have to say, I'm a bit fuzzy on how "Escort" works too. If anyone could walk through a barebones description of how to set a fighter squadron and a bomber squadron so that the former is more likely to escort the latter as it goes to rain down death and destruction on the enemy, I'd appreciate it.

Definitely at one time I had perfect mastery of these mechanics in WiTP and WPO, probably even in WiTPAE during the brief period I played it after it came out.

But there have been so many intervening games in the years since . . . I think Supreme Ruler is what is messing up my memory. In that one, you actually specify "Escort THIS unit (air land or sea)" by selecting it after you click "Escort" mission for a fighter unit. Just fiddling around to get back into WiTPAE and train up for a PBEM against Malagant, I'm seeing it don't work thataway in WiTPAE [&:]
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
User avatar
chazz
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:35 pm
Location: Australia

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by chazz »

I figured that part out- ESCORT has your air group fly top cover for another task force- say for example you want CAP over an invasion force. Allocate LR CAP to whatever % you want, with the air grp set to ESCORT and then click on the target TF as the one you want covered by the LR CAP.
=================================
Thank you for your replies and advice!!

"If you're in a fair fight, then you didn't plan it properly" - Nick Lappos
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

Have to say, I'm a bit fuzzy on how "Escort" works too. If anyone could walk through a barebones description of how to set a fighter squadron and a bomber squadron so that the former is more likely to escort the latter as it goes to rain down death and destruction on the enemy, I'd appreciate it.

Definitely at one time I had perfect mastery of these mechanics in WiTP and WPO, probably even in WiTPAE during the brief period I played it after it came out.

But there have been so many intervening games in the years since . . . I think Supreme Ruler is what is messing up my memory. In that one, you actually specify "Escort THIS unit (air land or sea)" by selecting it after you click "Escort" mission for a fighter unit. Just fiddling around to get back into WiTPAE and train up for a PBEM against Malagant, I'm seeing it don't work thataway in WiTPAE [&:]

Fighters set to do nothing, will fly escort for bombers. They should be at the same base, have a good leader, good morale and low fatigue and perhaps set at an altitude near the same as the bombers. Do not set them to any other activity including rest. The number if any that fly is determined by the AI. Escorts are at a disadvantage when faced with strong CAP and usually take a knocking
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
Malagant
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 1:30 am

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by Malagant »

Some good info can be found here:

tm.asp?m=2382494

"La Garde meurt, elle ne se rend pas!"
User avatar
Trugrit
Posts: 1186
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 12:31 pm
Location: North Carolina

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by Trugrit »


Welcome back Chazz,

What Malagant said.

Also:
tm.asp?m=3219921


"A man's got to know his limitations" -Dirty Harry
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Welcome back,

Follow the advice already mentioned, and remember that reloading again and again the same turn will not change outcomes; try going back 2 or 3 turns and you might see a difference

If he is playing the AI then reloading without making any changes will give the same results for the most part, but making any slight change anywhere before ending the turn WILL deliver differing results.
Hans

User avatar
Rising-Sun
Posts: 2207
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:27 am
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Contact:

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by Rising-Sun »

Yeah that what got me pissed off few times in my grand campaign. Believe it was end of Jan 1942, I manage to get two fighter and two bomber groups in Kota Bharu, along with air division HQ (both are attach to it). So I have my bombers hitting ground targets one hex away from Singapore, bam no fight escorts and second day I double check to see if there mistake or not properly setups. So everything was setup the way it is, good morale and less than 10 fatigue and second day bombers took off without an escorts again. Plenty of supports and the weathers was favorable, in real life, the bomber groups would be nervous and wouldn't want to go in the front line without fighter escorts nearby. Two bomber group (Ki-21s) and two fighter groups (Ki-43s), so they both are army aircraft types. That base Kota Bharu had 30 CAP and those fighter groups has over 30 planes each, using drop tanks so it would be able to escort the bombers and back. Unfort, just complete failure.

There is one more thing that bother me, random delay for pilot transfers. Wish it was calculated based on number of hexes away to determine how long it would take to be transferred. That random doesn't feel right, had one pilot transfer in same location during training exercise and took him 7 days to get the next air group, same location lol.

That is it, no more wasting my time playing this! The game would have been great if they fix this escort thing, esp that is attach to same location, same HQs. I am not sure if you can mix naval and army planes, that can be delay at some points.

They can be assign CAP and escort duties though, I have seen this done before. Depending on morale and fatigue as well the leaders. I had good leaders on those groups as well HQs.
Image
paradigmblue
Posts: 784
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:44 pm
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by paradigmblue »

ORIGINAL: RisingSun

That base Kota Bharu had 30 CAP in zero range

There's your problem right there, if your fighters are set to 0 range they can't leave the hex to escort the bombers because you've limited their range to 0. If your fighters were set to max range they will escort your bombers as long as those bombers don't outrange them. If you want to ensure your bombers are escorted all of the time, make sure that the bombers max range is lowered to match the max range of your fighters.
User avatar
MuguNiner
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:19 am

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by MuguNiner »

Greetings,

It is helpful to use screen shots. You could take a screen shot of your carrier fighter sqd. Pictures speak 1000 works. In one of my last posts I complained about my P38's getting beat up by zeros, and transports not moving. Several things were pointed out from the screen shots that I would not have brought up in words.

To take a screen shot:

Press Alt-PrtScn
Open Paint
Paste screen shot into the paste window Ctrl-V
You can then save the screen shot as a .gif to your desktop or favorite folder
Click "Click here to upload" to import your screen shot.
Check the box "Embed picture in post".

Then ask your question. Easy as Pi.


Image
Attachments
Untitled.gif
Untitled.gif (182.87 KiB) Viewed 225 times
USMC 1976-80
pthighs
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:57 pm

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by pthighs »

ORIGINAL: chazz

This is practically a game-breaker for me.

The game insists upon sending my carrier bombers against Japanese carrier groups unescorted; I have tried adjusting the LR CAP and CAP %'s but still no luck.

My carrier fighters are set for ESCORT. at the same altitude as the DB's - 10000'.

It is May of '42, three CV's in the TF, with Bull Halsey in command.

I get the same result every time- all the fighters stay to protect the carrier and one or two (at most) accompany the strike wave. Needless to say my bombers are getting schwacked.


Is there some kind of secret to getting your fighters to go along on carrier strikes?

Another thing to keep in mind - three carriers is a lot to have in a single TF in 1942. You may well be suffering coordination penalties as a result that will exacerbate this problem. The limits per year are in the manual.
User avatar
Rising-Sun
Posts: 2207
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:27 am
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Contact:

RE: Frustrating Carrier Strike Issue. No escorting fighters!!

Post by Rising-Sun »

ORIGINAL: paradigmblue

ORIGINAL: RisingSun

That base Kota Bharu had 30 CAP in zero range

There's your problem right there, if your fighters are set to 0 range they can't leave the hex to escort the bombers because you've limited their range to 0. If your fighters were set to max range they will escort your bombers as long as those bombers don't outrange them. If you want to ensure your bombers are escorted all of the time, make sure that the bombers max range is lowered to match the max range of your fighters.

Ah sorry I miss type that, was thinking of something else. Yes they range was align with bombers. Sorry for the wrong inputs here. It wasn't zero. I was thinking in another locations that was CAP at zero and got missed up with this locations. This game can be annoying and trying to keep track of everything. Was doing good until this kick in near Singapore. My Betties and Nells always get their escorts from the zeros and the zeros were CAP incase B-17s try to pound in Formosa.

Up North of Bangkok, I had 14 Ki-43-IIc and lost one plane within 30 days, they manage to shoot down almost 50 planes that flew from somewhere up near Rangoon. Was doing good down Singapore, then the bombers wouldn't take the escorts. Every Allied bombers that tried to attack my base, always has escorts.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”