https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSNTAv8MTJY

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

ORIGINAL: Leandros
Nice! As cumbersome as it is the 1919 Browning is my all-time favourite. Get the creeps seeing long bursts like that, though - that barrel doesn't change in a
second or two. Cock-offs, too.
The Tiger tank he refers to in the movie "Fury" with Brad Pitt can be had as a 1/72 scale diecast model - I have it:
Fred
![]()


ORIGINAL: HansBolter
I've only seen Fury once and didn't pay close enough attention to the details of the Tiger to see if it was accurately depicted or what unit numbers it carried.
ORIGINAL: Leandros
ORIGINAL: HansBolter
I've only seen Fury once and didn't pay close enough attention to the details of the Tiger to see if it was accurately depicted or what unit numbers it carried.
I should think it pretty accurate since the actual Tiger participating in the movie was the one captured in North Africa 1943.
Fred


ORIGINAL: Treetop64
Hate how the movie Fury is constantly being picked as a "source" of information. Guess a lot of impressionable folks still consider watching movies qualifies as receiving an education or something... [8|]
Not that Fury was that great of a movie.
Of course, I was also in the process of watching The Pacific when I brought Fury home one evening from the local RedBox, and it just didn't stand a chance. Even just one episode of The Pacific is an infinitely better war drama.
ORIGINAL: Leandros
ORIGINAL: Treetop64
Hate how the movie Fury is constantly being picked as a "source" of information. Guess a lot of impressionable folks still consider watching movies qualifies as receiving an education or something... [8|]
Not that Fury was that great of a movie.
Of course, I was also in the process of watching The Pacific when I brought Fury home one evening from the local RedBox, and it just didn't stand a chance. Even just one episode of The Pacific is an infinitely better war drama.
What should be interesting with the film is the fact that it is a real Tiger, and one actually in the same area as the action it depicts.
Apart from that I haven't even seen it. But; I do have a diecast model of the actual Tiger - "131"....[:)]....
Fred
ORIGINAL: HansBolter
ORIGINAL: Leandros
What should be interesting with the film is the fact that it is a real Tiger, and one actually in the same area as the action it depicts.
Apart from that I haven't even seen it. But; I do have a diecast model of the actual Tiger - "131"....[:)]....
Fred
While I was too caught up in the action to scrutinize the Tiger too closely, I did find myself think it was too realistic to be CGI.
Glad to knopw they got their hands on a real Tiger. I have seen video of the Bovington Tiger being driven around the yard there. Very impressive.
In the interest of respecting artistic license we should avoid scrutinizing the question of how likely an encounter with a Tiger from a production run in 1943 would have been at that point in '45.
I'm sure the guys on the model forums will be picking it to pieces. They can be downright brutal. You post a proud picture of your latest kit and it gets picked apart by the accuracy Nazi...."you have the wrong wheel bolt pattern for the vehicle number you used."
Then they will go one to tell you what factory production run a particular vehicle came from and why your wheel bolt pattern is incorrect. [8|]
ORIGINAL: Anthropoid
The liberal media must have aneurysms to watch that guy [:D]
