Can you imagine German powers given a greater impetus to build Graf Zeppelin class carriers before the war?

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition


warspite1ORIGINAL: m10bob
After WWI the Japanese were given the German holdings in the Pacific. What if they returned them to the Germans when they joined the axis powers?
Can you imagine German powers given a greater impetus to build Graf Zeppelin class carriers before the war?
![]()
warspite1ORIGINAL: Big B
Now warspite1 ...don't be a Buzz Kill [;)] [:D]
Having said that, m10bob's original idea being that the Germans had their Marshall & Gilbert Islands returned to them - If it where a carrot given to Germany by Japan for joining the Axis (say by 1937-1939) ...yeah maybe not at all realistic, for one - why would Japan possibly do that at the time?
BUT... suppose WW1 ended differently? Mainly, suppose Wilson's original proposals of not punishing Germany alone for starting the war (14 Points?) Suppose Wilson had more balls and flatly demanded that the peace to Germany in 1918 would be NOT vindictive Victor's Peace ...and then Wilson even got backing by the Senate?
Well in that case maybe Hitler never even comes to power in 1932...but assuming he does anyway - now Germany keeps her possessions in the Pacific.
So now we have a 'not as quite pissed off Germany', and a Germany with global commitments (Pacific AND African colonies)... and under The 14 Points - a Germany NOT forced to pay for ALL of World War One...so she has a better economic base to build from by 1930....
Given THAT scenario? ... Maybe Germany would have followed Britain, USA, and Japan in building aircraft carriers in the 1930s.
Impossible to say - but I think it enters the realm of "maybe?"
B
You slay me warspite1 LOL ...wiping the tea off of himself [:D]ORIGINAL: warspite1
[Splutters - spitting tea all over the place] Gilberts!!!!! I think not sir!!
ORIGINAL: Big B
The only big problem I see is - If Germany Isn't pissed on by EVERYONE at Versailles... does WW2 even happen???
ORIGINAL: jwolf
ORIGINAL: Big B
The only big problem I see is - If Germany Isn't pissed on by EVERYONE at Versailles... does WW2 even happen???
IMHO this is the elephant in the room. You don't get WW2 in any form we would recognize without both WW1 and a punitive treaty against Germany.
....
warspite1ORIGINAL: Big B
Yeah - it enters an area of asking - If this - Then why That?ORIGINAL: warspite1
[Splutters - spitting tea all over the place] Gilberts!!!!! I think not sir!!
May I offer you a new cup of tea, My Lord?ORIGINAL: warspite1
[Splutters - spitting tea all over the place] Gilberts!!!!! I think not sir!!
warspite1ORIGINAL: Orm
May I offer you a new cup of tea, My Lord?ORIGINAL: warspite1
[Splutters - spitting tea all over the place] Gilberts!!!!! I think not sir!!
Then we might consider what the proper, proportional, response would be if the Germans begun building carriers and militarized the Pacific.
A new ship building plan is a must. Militarizing the Pacific seems wise as well. Should we propose a trade embargo against the militaristic, warmongering, Germans?
What are your thoughts My Lord?
The Graf Zeppelin-class aircraft carriers were four German Kriegsmarine aircraft carriers planned in the mid-1930s by Grand Admiral Erich Raeder as part of the Plan Z rearmament program after Germany and Great Britain signed the Anglo-German Naval Agreement. They were planned after a thorough study of Japanese carrier designs; nevertheless, German naval architects ran into difficulties due to lack of experience in building such vessels, the situational realities of carrier operations in the North Sea and the lack of overall clarity in the ships' mission objectives. This lack of clarity led to features either eliminated from or not included in American and Japanese carrier designs. These included a complement of cruiser-type guns for commerce raiding and defense against British cruisers. American and Japanese carriers, designed along the lines of task-force defense, used supporting cruisers for surface firepower, which allowed flight operations to continue without disruption and kept carriers out of undue risk of damage or sinking from surface action.ORIGINAL: warspite1
warspite1ORIGINAL: m10bob
After WWI the Japanese were given the German holdings in the Pacific. What if they returned them to the Germans when they joined the axis powers?
Can you imagine German powers given a greater impetus to build Graf Zeppelin class carriers before the war?
![]()
Sounds pretty far fetched. The problems being:
- When do you consider the Japanese as joining the Axis? 1940?
- What about the build time for these large vessels if 1940 is the start date?
- Even with those under-construction such as the Graf Zeppelin, her completion will mean someone - Army or Luftwaffe - going short in the resource department. Would Hitler compromise Lebensraum in the East in this way - for the navy? Plan Z showed where priority lay - and then, once war started, the u-boats took priority.
- You mention Graf Zeppelin-class. There was only one of her class envisaged (plus a second smaller carrier). The problem of course being the need to keep to the Anglo-German Naval Agreement limitations. If the Germans did decide to build more a) they would run into the steel problem mentioned above and b) they would have to be mindful of the treaty. The plan remember was for the Illustrious-class to replace the old British carriers - not to supplement them. Hitler was mindful not to **** off the British in the build up to the war as he felt he could keep her onside.
- Then of course is the not inconsiderable matter of repair and dockyard facilities in these undeveloped Pacific islands.
DOCUP is looking at a mod to include existing German ships in the Pacific (using the pretext that the Germans owned their former mandates and territories in the Pacific) - but this does not assume new ships.

ORIGINAL: warspite1
You are correct in that there was a second ship (and it is believed she was laid down - although even Conways do not know when) and these two would provide 35% of the Royal Navy carrier tonnage.
Sure its a "what-if" and entirely up to you what you are happy with - I was just trying to inject some background for consideration. After all, a "what-if" is one thing - complete fantasy is something else! [;)]
Plan Z was a total pipe-dream.


ORIGINAL: Big B
You slay me warspite1 LOL ...wiping the tea off of himself [:D]ORIGINAL: warspite1
[Splutters - spitting tea all over the place] Gilberts!!!!! I think not sir!!
Yeah - it enters an area of asking - If this - Then why That?
BUT... Hmm yeah - Germany isn't so P'O'ed... they enter into ALL the Naval Treaties...but they get carriers (1 - 2 - 3?)
The only big problem I see is - If Germany Isn't pissed on by EVERYONE at Versailles... does WW2 even happen???
Do you mean the short time after December 7th and the time they capture Manila, Guam, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc?ORIGINAL: Skyros
If you are going to turn over Truk, Palau and Kwajalien to the Germans, where will the IJN base its fleet?

I would think you would need to build up other island chains in Japanese control to protect the pacific flank. The mandates formed a shield for the Japanese empire that has now been rolled back almost to Japan itself. The German forces occupying those islands would be small compared to what the Japanese had at Bablethup, Kwajalein and Truk.ORIGINAL: m10bob
Do you mean the short time after December 7th and the time they capture Manila, Guam, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc?ORIGINAL: Skyros
If you are going to turn over Truk, Palau and Kwajalien to the Germans, where will the IJN base its fleet?