Naval War Day-by-Day

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Pvt_Grunt

They would have been a real force to be reckoned with had they been up-gunned to 15" as planned. As long as they didnt lose too much speed from extra weight.
warspite1

They would have been similarly armed, slightly faster, but less well armoured ship in comparison to the Bismarcks.

Having four 15-inch capital ships opposing them would have been a worry for the British - but as was proved during the war - their real threat came as a fleet in being (tieing down more ships to the Home Fleet than could ideally be spared) rather than as surface raiders themselves.

For whatever my opinion is worth, up-gunning the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau would have accomplished very little. Their guns had more than adequate range, scoring one of the two longest-distance naval gunnery hits on record. And I'm not aware that they ever hit anything that 15" guns could have penetrated while 11" guns could not.
warspite1

Not my specialist subject. I was surprised to see the elevation of the 11-inch guns was 40 degrees - and only 30 degrees for the 15-inch, thus giving the smaller gun a 3-mile increase in range.

However, I am not sure that this extreme range is that important (gut feel only). More important I would have thought is the sheer weight of shell that each ship could deliver.

15-inch = 1,764lbs x 8 guns = Broadside of 12,112lbs
11-inch = 6,547lbs x 9 guns = Broadside of 6,547lbs

That is a big difference (although the rate of fire was higher for the smaller gun).

I am sure there are some people on this forum who are better placed than me to relate all this to typical battle scenarios and the defences that enemy ships could put up.

Really interesting topic.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by warspite1 »

17th - 19th November 1939 (North Sea)

With two highly lucrative operations behind them (see Posts 119 and 147) the Germans were keen to try and exploit their success. Two further operations were carried out on the 17th / 18th (Thames Estuary) and the 18th / 19th (Humber Estuary).

For each operation the Kriegsmarine employed three destroyers:
Thames: Hermann Kunne, Bernd von Arnim and Wilhelm Heidkamp commanded by FregattenKapitan Hans Hartmann.
Humber: Erich Steinbrinck, Hans Lody and Friedrich Eckoldt commanded by FregattenKapitan Erich Bey

In the Thames Estuary the mines claimed victims almost immediately; two ships were sunk on the 18th, including a Dutch liner with many women and children aboard. Three days later a destroyer flotilla left Harwich to start a patrol of the area. One of the destroyers, HMS Gypsy (Lt.Cdr Nigel Crossley), struck one of the mines and she broke in two. 30 men were lost including the captain. Further losses were taken in the coming days.

The destroyer minelaying operations off the East Coast would continue until February and we shall be re-visiting this topic over the next three months. The destroyers would not return to the Humber however. The two operations in this important waterway caused the loss of fourteen merchant ships.


Erich Bey. Bey was another German Admiral that would rise through the ranks to command one of the capital ships of the Kriegsmarine later in the war. He was killed while commanding the battlecruiser Scharnhorst during the Battle of the North Cape.

Image

Source:
The Gathering Storm (Geirr H Haarr)
Attachments
download.jpg
download.jpg (50.69 KiB) Viewed 928 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by warspite1 »

I spotted an error in one of the previous posts so have re-worked the following:

Post 119 - Completely new
Post 147 - Amended part of the previous wording to take into account the new detail in 119
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by Zorch »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock

ORIGINAL: warspite1


warspite1

They would have been similarly armed, slightly faster, but less well armoured ship in comparison to the Bismarcks.

Having four 15-inch capital ships opposing them would have been a worry for the British - but as was proved during the war - their real threat came as a fleet in being (tieing down more ships to the Home Fleet than could ideally be spared) rather than as surface raiders themselves.

For whatever my opinion is worth, up-gunning the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau would have accomplished very little. Their guns had more than adequate range, scoring one of the two longest-distance naval gunnery hits on record. And I'm not aware that they ever hit anything that 15" guns could have penetrated while 11" guns could not.
warspite1

Not my specialist subject. I was surprised to see the elevation of the 11-inch guns was 40 degrees - and only 30 degrees for the 15-inch, thus giving the smaller gun a 3-mile increase in range.

However, I am not sure that this extreme range is that important (gut feel only). More important I would have thought is the sheer weight of shell that each ship could deliver.

15-inch = 1,764lbs x 8 guns = Broadside of 12,112lbs
11-inch = 6,547lbs x 9 guns = Broadside of 6,547lbs

That is a big difference (although the rate of fire was higher for the smaller gun).

I am sure there are some people on this forum who are better placed than me to relate all this to typical battle scenarios and the defences that enemy ships could put up.

Really interesting topic.
I think the up gunning would have been of little importance. The limiting factor for the use of these ships was that a damaged (or low on fuel or ammo) ship would have limited options, as the Bismarck and Graf Spee showed. This forced the Germans to be cautious and avoid engagements unless close to home waters.
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by warspite1 »

Up to 21st November 1939 (The Atlantic and North Sea – The Northern Patrol)

Post 152 gave a brief introduction to the Armed Merchant Cruiser (AMC) fleet that started to come into service in October 1939. During November, these ships played their part, alongside regular naval vessels, in trying to enforce the blockade of German ports and the interception of enemy ships trying to reach Germany.

One can only imagine what life must have been like in those northern waters (in a rough line Scotland – Iceland – Greenland) during the winter months. The patrol work was incredibly tedious – often with no ships sighted for days on end, but with the need to be constantly vigilant in case of the appearance of U-boats or enemy surface ships, in addition to finding the ships that were specifically being targeted by the patrol. At the same time the weather was often atrocious, with ship damaging seas whipped up by hurricane force winds, driving rain or snow and the intense cold making life thoroughly miserable for those aboard. And as for the poor gunners - the 6-inch guns mounted on the AMC’s were open, often without even shields for protection. Just grim.

But the job needed doing and during November neutral vessels continued being intercepted – at which point a decision had to be made as to whether a ship was allowed to proceed or was to be taken to a UK port. Enemy vessels were more likely to be scuttled than captured – examples in November were the Panama (intercepted by HMS Newcastle) and Mecklenburg (intercepted by HMS Delhi) but as we have seen there were some exceptions – including the German freighter Borkum, which was captured by the AMC California only to be torpedoed and sunk in turn by U-31.

The position on the 21st November was as follows:

- Guarding the Denmark Strait (between Iceland and Greenland) were the heavy cruisers Norfolk and Suffolk along with the AMC’s Aurania, California and Transylvania.
- In a rough line from Iceland travelling southeast to the Faroes, and operating about 40 miles apart, were the light cruisers Newcastle, Delhi, Calypso and Ceres (with the AMC Rawalpindi north and east of the D-class cruiser).
- Between the Faroes and Scotland were the light cruisers Caledon, Colombo, Diomede, Dunedin and Cardiff.
- Other AMC's would have been at sea on the Northern Patrol at this time e.g. Laurentic and Chitral, but I cannot get a fix on their position.
- The Home Fleet was back in the Clyde (Scapa was still not considered safe at this time) having recently escorted an important Iron Ore convoy from Norway.

……..meanwhile, departing Wilhelmshaven on the 21st were the battlecruisers Scharnhorst and Gneisenau (Flagship of Admiral Wilhelm Marschall) along with an escort from the Reconnaissance Force consisting of the light cruisers Koln and Leipzig and three destroyers……


HMS Newcastle. One of the Type I Town-class cruisers. Newcastle’s career was largely unheralded, but she was involved almost from start to finish, survived torpedo damage incurred in the Mediterranean and featured in almost all theatres of World War II
Image


HMS Delhi. The elderly cruiser was, like her D-class sisters and those of the C-class, long overdue for the scrapheap, but saved by the threat of war in the mid-thirties. The Admiralty had plans to convert the C and D-class to anti-aircraft cruisers but there was little money for such a project, too little dockyard space and altogether too many other pressing concerns. As a result few conversions had taken place by September 1939 – and HMS Delhi was one of those that remained pretty much in her World War I guise.

Before:

Image


However, in 1941, under lend-lease, she was sent to the US for a refit (the USN were curious to see how their 5-inch gun would perform in combat) and she was given USN 5-inch destroyer weaponry. She was to be unique amongst RN ships as by the end of the year the US were in the war and they had better things to be doing than providing ageing British cruisers with extensive refits that used weapons that could more usefully be employed in their own ships. HMS Delhi had her 6-inch guns replaced with five single 5-inch guns and, unlike US destroyers, was given a second director, making her a “two-target” ship. Further anti-aircraft defence was provided by two quadruple 2-pdr pompoms each with directors and ten 20mm guns.

After:

Image

Sources:
Conways All The Worlds Fighting Ships 1922-1946
British Cruisers (Norman Friedman)
The War at Sea 1939-45 Volume I (Stephen Roskill)
The Gathering Storm (Geirr H Haarr)
Attachments
Photo06clD..11942NP.jpg
Photo06clD..11942NP.jpg (32.16 KiB) Viewed 928 times
Delhi.jpg
Delhi.jpg (33.72 KiB) Viewed 928 times
Newcastle.jpg
Newcastle.jpg (28.82 KiB) Viewed 928 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by Capt. Harlock »

Not my specialist subject. I was surprised to see the elevation of the 11-inch guns was 40 degrees - and only 30 degrees for the 15-inch, thus giving the smaller gun a 3-mile increase in range.

However, I am not sure that this extreme range is that important (gut feel only). More important I would have thought is the sheer weight of shell that each ship could deliver.

15-inch = 1,764lbs x 8 guns = Broadside of 12,112lbs
11-inch = 6,547lbs x 9 guns = Broadside of 6,547lbs

That is a big difference (although the rate of fire was higher for the smaller gun).

Not to hijack this exceeding interesting and well-researched thread, but the survivors of the HMS Glorious would likely believe that long-range accuracy could be important. Scharnhorst scored a hit on her while she was trying to escape which may have fatally slowed her, and that hit may have been the longest-range ship-to-ship gun hit in history. (You'll be interested to know that the other possibility was scored by HMS Warspite.)

My calculations for broadside weight come to:

15-inch = 1,764lbs x 8 guns = Broadside of 14,112lbs
11-inch = 741 lbs x 9 guns = Broadside of 6,669lbs


I believe that the up-gunning plan was to equip Scharnhorst and Gneisenau with three double 15-inch turrets rather than four. I don't see how a fourth turret could have been fitted without extraordinary rework. This would have given them:

1,764 lbs X 6 guns = Broadside of 10,584 lbs

Definitely an improvement on the 11-inch, but not the more than doubling of eight guns.
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
Not my specialist subject. I was surprised to see the elevation of the 11-inch guns was 40 degrees - and only 30 degrees for the 15-inch, thus giving the smaller gun a 3-mile increase in range.

However, I am not sure that this extreme range is that important (gut feel only). More important I would have thought is the sheer weight of shell that each ship could deliver.

15-inch = 1,764lbs x 8 guns = Broadside of 12,112lbs
11-inch = 6,547lbs x 9 guns = Broadside of 6,547lbs

That is a big difference (although the rate of fire was higher for the smaller gun).

Not to hijack this exceeding interesting and well-researched thread, but the survivors of the HMS Glorious would likely believe that long-range accuracy could be important. Scharnhorst scored a hit on her while she was trying to escape which may have fatally slowed her, and that hit may have been the longest-range ship-to-ship gun hit in history. (You'll be interested to know that the other possibility was scored by HMS Warspite.)

My calculations for broadside weight come to:

15-inch = 1,764lbs x 8 guns = Broadside of 14,112lbs
11-inch = 741 lbs x 9 guns = Broadside of 6,669lbs


I believe that the up-gunning plan was to equip Scharnhorst and Gneisenau with three double 15-inch turrets rather than four. I don't see how a fourth turret could have been fitted without extraordinary rework. This would have given them:

1,764 lbs X 6 guns = Broadside of 10,584 lbs

Definitely an improvement on the 11-inch, but not the more than doubling of eight guns.
warspite1

A few things in response Capt.

1. I did not say range was unimportant, what I was putting out there (because I simply do not know enough about this) is to what extent extreme range (so a 3-mile difference quoted previously) is more/less/equally as important as rate of fire and weight of broadside when considering optimal choice. I do not know enough about the ranges many individual battles were fought at, but presumably most would have been at considerably less than maximum range?

2. Let's not muck about HMS Warspite holds that record. FACT. And I'm not even biased [;)] Will cover off this engagement and look specifically at this.

3. You are quite right - it would have been three turrets not four.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Aurelian
Posts: 4085
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by Aurelian »

Scharnhorst beat Warspite by @465 yards

http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-006.htm

Though in the grand scheme of things, it's a tie.
Building a new PC.
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

Scharnhorst beat Warspite by @465 yards

http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-006.htm

Though in the grand scheme of things, it's a tie.
warspite1

I think, as a mature adult, it is important to maintain one's composure at times like this. Even in the face of quite hideous provocation, I believe one should act with decorum, with civility, and remembering to keep one's dignity at all times.

Ergo and theretofore, re the question of Scharnhorst hitting Glorious at longer range than The Old Lady hit the Guilio Ceesre, I say this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Luyw5mWV5is
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Aurelian
Posts: 4085
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by Aurelian »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

Scharnhorst beat Warspite by @465 yards

http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-006.htm

Though in the grand scheme of things, it's a tie.
warspite1

I think, as a mature adult, it is important to maintain one's composure at times like this. Even in the face of quite hideous provocation, I believe one should act with decorum, with civility, and remembering to keep one's dignity at all times.

Ergo and theretofore, re the question of Scharnhorst hitting Glorious at longer range than The Old Lady hit the Guilio Ceesre, I say this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Luyw5mWV5is
[:D][:D][:D]
Building a new PC.
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by Zorch »

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

Scharnhorst beat Warspite by @465 yards

http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-006.htm

Though in the grand scheme of things, it's a tie.
warspite1

I think, as a mature adult, it is important to maintain one's composure at times like this. Even in the face of quite hideous provocation, I believe one should act with decorum, with civility, and remembering to keep one's dignity at all times.

Ergo and theretofore, re the question of Scharnhorst hitting Glorious at longer range than The Old Lady hit the Guilio Ceesre, I say this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Luyw5mWV5is
[:D][:D][:D]
There is no truth to the rumor that Warspite and Aurelian will engage in a steel cage death match to determine who holds the record. [&o][&o][&o]

Did Warspite and Scharnhorst ever get within shooting distance of each other?
Aurelian
Posts: 4085
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by Aurelian »

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

ORIGINAL: warspite1


warspite1

I think, as a mature adult, it is important to maintain one's composure at times like this. Even in the face of quite hideous provocation, I believe one should act with decorum, with civility, and remembering to keep one's dignity at all times.

Ergo and theretofore, re the question of Scharnhorst hitting Glorious at longer range than The Old Lady hit the Guilio Ceesre, I say this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Luyw5mWV5is
[:D][:D][:D]
There is no truth to the rumor that Warspite and Aurelian will engage in a steel cage death match to determine who holds the record. [&o][&o][&o]

Did Warspite and Scharnhorst ever get within shooting distance of each other?

Nope. The only battleship Scharnhorst ever engaged was HMS Duke of York. And got sunk for her trouble. (Warspite1 will eventually get to that spat.)

She and her sister did engage the HMS Renown for a brief time. Gneisenau took two hits. The sisters ended up running away.
Building a new PC.
User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by CarnageINC »

Oh, I better set the table with some plates soon....

Image

[:D][;)][:'(]
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by warspite1 »

Following on from Post 165.

21st – 27th November 1939 (North Atlantic and North Sea – Surface fleet action)

The sortie by Scharnhorst and Gneisenau was ordered in order to assist the Graf Spee - still in the South Atlantic at this time but preparing for her voyage home. To this end, and as mentioned in Post 146, in addition to the battlecruisers, Donitz had been ordered to place some U-boats in the North Sea ready to intercept any Royal Navy vessels that sought to intercept Vice-Admiral Marschall’s ships should they be found. However the U-boats were to play no further part in this story.

The battlecruisers mission was not designed to be a breakout into the Atlantic; merely a feint in order to tie up Allied forces that could otherwise be deployed elsewhere. In addition, and subject to the usual rules not to engage more powerful enemy forces, Vice-Admiral Marschall’s ships would hopefully sink whatever targets presented themselves during the course of the operation.

Shortly after leaving port the escorting light cruisers and destroyers detached from the battlecruisers in order to conduct patrol work in the Skaggerak. Not for the first time, British reconnaissance (aided by poor weather conditions) was lacking, and Scharnhorst and her sister were completely undetected as they made their way toward the Faroes Gap between Iceland and the Faroes Islands.

Two days into the voyage, just before 1600hrs on the 23rd, the Scharnhorst’s lookouts spotted a ship about 15 miles away on their starboard bow. Gneisenau was over 10 miles further back at this point and Scharnhorst set course to intercept the ship alone while Marschall’s flagship steamed northwest to assist. Scharnhorst’s commander, Kapt. Kurt Hoffman, ordered that the unidentified vessel be signalled to ask “What ship?” and also to order radio silence.

Meanwhile, aboard the Armed Merchant Cruiser Captain Edward Kennedy’s options were limited to say the very least. With guns that could easily be outranged, a top speed nothing like enemy she was about to face, and no support close to hand, Kennedy must have known all too well how this would play out. Upon hearing of the outbreak of war, Admiral Erich Raeder wrote in his memoirs that the best the men of the Kriegsmarine could do was to “go down fighting” and to “show that we know how to die gallantly”. Swap HMS Rawalpindi for Kriegsmarine and I suspect Captain Kennedy was feeling exactly the same…..

The sender of the signal was erroneously identified as being a Deutschland-class panzerschiff by those aboard Rawalpindi, but that made no difference to the situation faced by the British ship. Kennedy ordered that the signal be simply acknowledged and, in line with orders turned away from the enemy whilst giving time to report the encounter to the Home Fleet. Having done so, nothing would be heard from HMS Rawalpindi again. Upon receipt of the communication, Admiral Forbes ordered the Home Fleet to sail.

At just after 1600hrs and with the range at 8,000 yards the battle began. Having seen that the enemy ship would not surrender, Hoffman ordered fire to commence and Scharnhorst’s very first salvo found the target. In so doing both the bridge and the radio room were destroyed. The second salvo was equally devastating, smashing into the engine room. The Rawalpindi fought back as best she could but with all power gone, shells had to be manually brought to the guns.

Soon Gneisenau too opened fire on the already burning and doomed vessel and, in less than fifteen minutes from the first shell landing, it was all over. Rawalpindi, ablaze from stem to stern, would soon disappear beneath the waves, taking 238 men with her. There were just 38 survivors – most of whom were rescued by the German ships.

Meanwhile Royal Navy ships close by that had picked up Rawalpindi’s radio message had headed straight for her reported position. The first to arrive was the light cruiser HMS Newcastle. The arrival of the cruiser ended any further rescue efforts and the German ships withdrew. It appears strange that Marschall did not seem to consider attacking the Newcastle. Both she and the approaching HMS Delhi would have been unlikely to survive an encounter with the two battlecruisers. The operations staff back in Berlin would later be asking the same question too….

The weather made Marschall’s escape easier as Newcastle, lacking radar, was unable to maintain contact in the gathering darkness and deteriorating conditions. Admiral Forbes ordered his ships into position to intercept the German vessels should they seek to return home or indeed to continue on to the Atlantic. To cover the latter the aircraft carrier Furious, the battleship Warspite and the battlecruiser Repulse were ordered to the Denmark Strait and the battlecruiser Hood and the French fast battleship Dunkerque were assigned to cover any breakout further east. Off the Norwegian Coast a line of cruisers – Southampton, Edinburgh and Aurora - was placed to intercept should Marschall head home. The cruisers were covered by the battleships Nelson and Rodney and the heavy cruiser Devonshire.

But to the intense frustration of all concerned, Marschall was able to evade the pursuers. After sailing into the Norwegian Sea, where the two battlecruisers spent two days waiting for the weather to worsen, they then managed to sneak through the patrol line and were able to return to Germany by the 27th. It was another disappointing episode for the Royal Navy. The loss of the carrier Courageous – and the patrol capability she would have given - was being felt already. To make matters worse, while returning to port, HMS Nelson struck a mine and was sidelined for months to come….

Back in Germany, there was mixed emotions amongst the staff officers of the OKM and the performance of Vice-Admiral Marschall - and specifically his perceived lack of aggression in response to the arrival of a 6-inch cruiser - was debated. Ultimately though, Raeder let the matter drop.


Having been previously identified as one of the ships destined for use as an Armed Merchant Cruiser in the event of war, SS Rawalpindi was requisitioned by the government in August 1939. Before being drafted into service as the AMC HMS Rawalpindi she was a 16,700 ton, 17-knot passenger liner, built in 1925, and operated by the P&O line between the UK and India. Reflecting her proposed use, she was named after a town in India (modern day Pakistan). In more peaceful times she could carry almost 600 passengers. As an AMC she was given eight 6-inch guns and two 3-inch anti-aircraft weapons. She was crewed by 286 officers and men (sixty of which were from her peacetime crew) and captained by Edward Kennedy RNVR, a 60-year old Royal Navy veteran brought out of retirement upon the outbreak of war.

The end of the valiant Rawalpindi.

Image

Sources:
The War at Sea 1939-45 Volume I (Stephen Roskill)
The Gathering Storm (Geirr H Haarr)
www.naval-history.net
Attachments
rawalpindi..525ac2ec.jpg
rawalpindi..525ac2ec.jpg (41.18 KiB) Viewed 930 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
tripwireCCS
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 5:11 pm

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by tripwireCCS »

Warspite1, excellent work you are doing on the WWII Naval War Day-by-Day articles. Keep 'em coming!

(I created an account here just to be able to reply to this topic)
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: tripwireCCS

Warspite1, excellent work you are doing on the WWII Naval War Day-by-Day articles. Keep 'em coming!

(I created an account here just to be able to reply to this topic)
warspite1

Thank-you for your support [:)]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by warspite1 »

30th November 1939 (Baltic Sea)

On this day the war, begun almost three months earlier with the German invasion of Poland, started to expand its grisly reach; the latest victim was the small Scandinavian republic of Finland.

Free to act in its “sphere of influence” thanks to the secret protocols of the Nazi-Soviet Pact, no sooner had the Soviets claimed their half of Poland, than Stalin began to put pressure on the Baltic States and Finland. The Baltic States had little choice but to comply (see Posts 59 and 133) but the Finns had other ideas. The Soviets requested from Finland various parts of key Finnish territory (including moving the Finnish-Soviet border back north of Leningrad) and certain islands in the Gulf of Finland for which the small state would receive areas of Karelia in return.

Despite the disparity in size, the Finns continued to resist even when, in early November, the tone of the requests became less polite and more of the menacing variety. On the 30th November the Soviets patience ran out….

The naval war was, for reasons that will become obvious, a case of much ado about nothing. There is not much to say on this because:

- The navies employed were relatively small
- The area being fought over was largely ice-bound for most of the war
- There is little detailed information I can find on the little action that did take place,

however, there were two or three engagements of note that took place before the Gulf froze over, and these will be mentioned during the course of December.

In the meantime, in Post 133 we looked at the Soviet Baltic Fleet, and we shall now take a brief look at the small Finnish navy. As said, the information available is scant in terms of what units were where in November 1939, but it appears that there were no units of any size on the Arctic Ocean in and around Petsamo. The navy maintained its main assets on the Baltic Coast, as one would expect given that this was the main centre of population and contained the ports that carried much of the trade to and from Finland.

Finnish Navy in November 1939

The Finnish Navy was very much behind the army when it came to military spending as the threat from the Soviet Union hung over the country throughout the inter-war years. The country had only gained its independence from Russia at the end of World War I and, apart from a few ships and boats left behind by the Russians, the Finns had to pretty much build their naval forces from scratch.

The Finnish Navy numbered around 33,000 men. It was commanded by Major-General Vaino Valve, who had been Commander of Naval Forces since 1933. I cannot ascertain why he did not hold naval rank. This may have been because of the importance of the coastal artillery batteries. Note: coastal batteries and some small boats were deployed on the shoreline of Lake Ladoga. One of the Finnish submarines – Saukko – was designed to operate in this lake – although she never did. The majority of the navy’s personnel was deployed in manning these coastal guns. Valve’s chief of staff was Ragnar Hakola. Below him was a Commander of the Navy and Commander of the Coastal Fleet – Commodore Eero Rahola.

The main ships, boats and submarines

Two coastal defence “battleships” – Ilmarinen and Vainamoinen
Five submarines – Vetehinen, Vesihiisi, Iku-Turso, Vesikko and Saukko
Four gunboats – Uusimaa, Hameenmaa, Karjala and Turunmaa
Minelayer – Louhi
Six minesweepers – Ahven, Kiiski, Kuore, Lahna, Muikko and Sarki. Note Conways indicate there were, in addition, two old Russian mineweepers – Rautu and Vilppula
Seven motor torpedo boats – Nuoli, Syoksy, Raju, Vinha, Sisu, Hurja and Isku


Built in the 1930’s, the largest ships in the Finnish Navy were the two coastal “battleships” of the Ilmarinen-class. These vessels (displacing just 3,900 tons standard) were not designed as ocean-going vessels, but were instead intended to provide protection for the vulnerable coastline of Finland from attack from the sea. As such their top speed (16-knots) and range were limited (only 93 tons of oil could be carried). Defensive armour was relatively light with a main belt of just over 2-inches and deck armour of just over 0.5 inches. For their size, the main armament of four 10-inch guns (mounted in two twin turrets) was out of proportion and made the ships top-heavy. As a result they were not good sea boats and prone to rolling. Secondary armament consisted of eight dual-purpose 4.1 inch guns mounted in twin turrets, and light anti-aircraft weaponry of both 20mm and 40mm.

Ilmarinen (pictured) was sunk later in the war, but her sister Vainamoinen, survived the war and was ceded to the Soviets in 1947.


Image

Source:
Conways: All The World’s Fighting Ships 1922-1946
www.winterwar.com
Attachments
Ilmarinen1.jpg
Ilmarinen1.jpg (26.06 KiB) Viewed 930 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by Zorch »

ORIGINAL: tripwireCCS

Warspite1, excellent work you are doing on the WWII Naval War Day-by-Day articles. Keep 'em coming!

(I created an account here just to be able to reply to this topic)
+1
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by warspite1 »

Okay I need a couple of things to round off November but research is proving difficult. In order not to delay things I will finish off November tomorrow - albeit with limited info - and will edit in due course as I hope to be able to get more info in the next few months.

Plenty to write about in December! [:)]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
cpdeyoung
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:26 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA

RE: Naval War Day-by-Day

Post by cpdeyoung »

Very much looking forward to your posts, and I look every day I can.

Chuck
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”