Mayhemizer vs AllenK: The rematch

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
Mayhemizer_slith
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:44 am
Location: Finland

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by Mayhemizer_slith »

ORIGINAL: AllenK

Guess Italy went for combined or naval then, not land.

Sorry, Italy and Japan combined. Edited to original post.
If your attack is going really well, it's an ambush.

-Murphy's war law
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

M/J 41 Allied 9

No DoW.

All pass except CW, Land for a 40% chance to end the turn.

CW advances in Greece and the Mil and a Div enter Rome. XI Mot swaps places with Yug Cav in Trieste.

No combats or reorgs.

On a 3, turn ends.
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

M/J 41 end of turn

A partisan appears in Korea and takes up position in the mountains east of Seoul. Another appears in the Netherlands and sits on the resource hex. 2 partisans appear in Russia, next to the Inf Div that cut the Murmansk road.

US puts a chit in the Ge/It pot. Fleet relocates to Pearl but it passes unnoticed and tension remains the same. US occupies Greenland and Iceland, which does increase tension in Ge/It. US also resolves to send resources to China, which increases tension.

AlbertN
Posts: 4275
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:44 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AlbertN »

I wonder ... CW has Rome, Trieste is a City with a Blue Factory.
What's the CW Garrison factor vs the Axis Garrison Factor in Italy?

If the latter is true, Italy would surrender no?
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

CW also has Tripoli, so garrison factors don't matter. Italy should surrender.
AlbertN
Posts: 4275
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:44 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AlbertN »

That's quite a feat, but careful on the impact of USE! It's pretty heavy if I remember correctly the table. *goes to check* Hmm, a -18 if Allies conquer Italy.
Subotei
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:53 am

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by Subotei »

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Nice rolls. It would have been fun to see ARM HQ take the first hit :)

Edit: We are doomed, but we will make you pay before that!


Glad to hear it. [8D] Don't give up the ship!
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

ORIGINAL: Cohen

That's quite a feat, but careful on the impact of USE! It's pretty heavy if I remember correctly the table. *goes to check* Hmm, a -18 if Allies conquer Italy.

Oh dear! Looks like I missed that one on the chart. It's amazing how well the eyes fail to spot something you don't want to see.

It should help cheer the Axis up and keep the game interesting. US entry is that screwed on the Ge/It front (partly through choice in USSR DoW'ing Germany) what's another 2 chits
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9083
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by Centuur »

The conquest of Italy is far more important than US entry in this game. Even if the CW can't hold on Rome in the long run...

Germany has overstretched itself, has far to many fronts to fight on. So it's very important to try to make Germany react on things by creating new small fronts, threathening to do all kinds of nasty things. The economic loss of Italy (even if only for a turn or two), together with the removal of units and the halving of Italy's force pool is quite an achievement.

I believe the Allies can handle the removal of chits in this game...
Peter
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

ORIGINAL: Centuur

The conquest of Italy is far more important than US entry in this game. Even if the CW can't hold on Rome in the long run...

Germany has overstretched itself, has far to many fronts to fight on. So it's very important to try to make Germany react on things by creating new small fronts, threathening to do all kinds of nasty things. The economic loss of Italy (even if only for a turn or two), together with the removal of units and the halving of Italy's force pool is quite an achievement.

I believe the Allies can handle the removal of chits in this game...

Thanks Centuur. That's reassuring.
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

Production:

Germany
Reforming 2 divisions into a Corps unit: Choose XXX Inf
6x MIL
GAR
FTR-2
Pilot

Italy
2x INF
Pilot
FTR-2

Japan
Reforming 2 divisions into a Corps unit: Only one option
INF
MAR
2x CP
CL Kashii (2nd)
CV Junyo (2nd)
CVL Shoho (2nd)
CVL Zhuiho (2nd)
Carrier air-1
SUB 4455 (2nd)

Vichy
Save 2 BP in Vichy
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

Allied production

China 4
Mil x2

CW 25
CV
Amph
CV 2nd
Lnd-4
Pilot
CP
Inf
Mot
CVP
Ftr-2

US 10
Inf
CP
Pilot
Ftr-2 x2

USSR 15
Mot x2
Inf
Ftr-2
Pilot
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

J/A 41 Initiative

Axis 3, Allies 9.

Do Axis wish to re-roll? They win ties.
User avatar
Mayhemizer_slith
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:44 am
Location: Finland

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by Mayhemizer_slith »

Axis want to use reroll. If Axis win initiative, they win this war!!!
If your attack is going really well, it's an ambush.

-Murphy's war law
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

Re-roll - Axis 2, Allies 7. Allies to go first.

Weather turns out fine except Nth Monsoon.

Image
Attachments
1.jpg
1.jpg (119.24 KiB) Viewed 245 times
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

J/A 41 Allied 1

No DoW

CW Naval, US Combined, USSR & China Land, France Pass.
AlbertN
Posts: 4275
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:44 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AlbertN »

So Italy is no more now?
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7267
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by AllenK »

ORIGINAL: Cohen

So Italy is no more now?

Italy was partially conquered. Il Duce relocated to Italian Somaliland.

Also Hungary returned to Axis control.
Subotei
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:53 am

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by Subotei »

Italy was partially conquered. Il Duce relocated to Italian Somaliland.

[:D] I forgot they still had it. World domination can't be far behind.
etsadler
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 7:41 pm

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch

Post by etsadler »

ORIGINAL: AllenK
ORIGINAL: Cohen

So Italy is no more now?

Italy was partially conquered. Il Duce relocated to Italian Somaliland.

Also Hungary returned to Axis control.

Was the third item that the Allies hold Tripoli, or that the Allied garrison factors were greater than the Italian? I looked for a map that reflected the garrison factors at the end of the turn and didn't find one that had all the necessary information.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”