Attack Bombers

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by geofflambert »

It just seems (to me) a crying shame that B-25s were not developed to carry torpedoes when called upon. I don't care that they were army, why didn't that happen?

User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7690
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by wdolson »

North American made torpedo racks for the B-25 and the Army did testing with them. They were never used operationally because by the time they could have been deployed, torpedoes were only used when going after carriers or battleships, neither of which were seen by US forces between late 1942 and mid-1943.

Bill
WIS Development Team
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by crsutton »

My understanding is that Gen. Kenney favored the A20 and wanted more. Not as effective as the B25 but in a theater where a downed plane over jungle or sea meant the very real chance of the loss of the crew, the A20 with it's 2 man crew offered a morbid economy of force.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by Dili »

The modified A-20s and B-25s were devastating in the low altitude skip bombing role. The suite of .50s was enough to sink small craft and kept flak gunners cowering on larger ships. The attack came in fast at mast height and was usually so quick the defending ship had no opportunity to maneuver. The most famous use of these bombers was the Battle of the Bismark Sea.

Didn't worked so well in Mediterranean due to many AA in all vessels including barges specific for AA. A Siebel barge could have 2 Quads 20mm plus 2 single 20mm and a 37mm.
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7690
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by wdolson »

US medium bombers were also dedicated to other roles than they were in the Pacific. In the Med they were used at medium altitudes to attack land targets more than they were in the Pacific.

Bill
WIS Development Team
User avatar
Lecivius
Posts: 4845
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Denver

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by Lecivius »

Gunn's team used whatever weapons were laying around. The existing B-17's were getting worn & inoperable. So were a lot of the fighters in theater. That's why the aircraft were fitted with ironed in weapons of various sorts. Some had a lot of .50's in the nose. Some had .50's and .30's. One had 2 .303's and 2 20mm from some busted Airacobra's. One had a 37mm hand loaded AT gun [X(]

All of this I got from Morison's.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7690
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by wdolson »

Pappy Gunn was an interesting character. He also had a reason to do all he could for the cause. He was a Navy pilot and retired in the 1930s. After retiring, he went and started an airline in the Philippines. He was there with his family when the war started and he was unable to get them out, so they got interned with other civilians. During the Philippines campaign he was flying an airliner as a liaison aircraft and went down in the jungle, but walked out a week later.

He escaped to Australia and was essentially drafted into the Army by MacArthur. He served as the 5th AF's engineering guru for most of the war.

At the Battle of Leyte Gulf, he went ashore in one of the early waves to help coordinate the establishment of the base at Tacloben. The first thing they did was build an emergency strip on the beach. That strip was used by the Navy flyers who lost their ship in the Battle Off Samar. The Navy planes were airborne so late in the day that night had fallen by the time their last tank of fuel began to run low and they needed to be guided in. At Tacloben there was only one person who knew how to do an LSO's job: Gunn. He grabs a couple of flaming torches and guided in every Navy plane. Because there was no room at the strip, most of the planes were pushed off into the surf as soon as they landed.

When my father arrived at Tacloben a few weeks later, he said the surf was full of Navy planes. He didn't know why they were there other than someone said the Navy had lost some carriers. He didn't learn the full story until recently.

Gunn probably became a good barnyard mechanic keeping his airline going in the middle of nowhere. It was the sort of field engineering the 5th AF needed during the dark days of 1942.

Bill
WIS Development Team
User avatar
Barb
Posts: 2503
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by Barb »

Pappy was one hell of a man. I have a book about him written by his son:
http://www.amazon.com/Pappy-Gunn-Nathaniel/dp/1418437751/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&sr=1-1&qid=1412229216

He was the man that never said "no" to any crazy idea - He tried to modify B-25s to the extent they were shedding skin when firing all the .50cals - I think he managed to pack 14 forward firing (2 top turret, 4 in side blisters, 8 in the nose) on one piece - but they had to remove them to keep the plane flyable.

He was the right men to the 5th Air Force - when Kenney asked North American to build strafer version of B-25, North American representatives said the plane would not fly because of center of gravity - Pappy replied to them he had removed the center of gravity from his planes [:D]

He was definitely the men that "got things done" - He stole 12 brand new B-25s from the Dutch air force (who doesn't have pilots trained in them) ... He even went back to the "place of crime" and requisitioned the (removed) bomb-sights on gun point.

He was also a man who can make things crazy - once he and few others rolled a bomb to a ditch behind some tents where pilots were sleeping... Most unappreciated wake up call [X(]

And as an legendary aviator, he ended his life in a plane crash - back in Philippines flying his own airline.
[&o]
Image
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5556
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by Yaab »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Attack bombers will drop down and attack at 100 feet for any attack set below 6,000 feet. The will suppress AA at bases and on ships (but can still potentially take a beating) Above 6,000 feet they work just like any other bomber. Non attack bombers only carry half a bomb load when set to low level attack. Fighters set to 1,000 feet will drop down to 100 feet as well.

Does it mean that if I set attack bombers to attack airfield/port/city/ground targets between 1000-5000 feet they will always drop to 100 feet? That can be pretty devastating for the attack bombers fly against ground targets.
oaltinyay
Posts: 598
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:52 pm

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by oaltinyay »

Has anyone experience with Ki45s or anything similar from IJN side ? I am producing a lot of them and training them in LowN to get at the lesser escorted groups.
towtow59_MatrixForum
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 11:08 pm

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by towtow59_MatrixForum »

ORIGINAL: Yaab

Does it mean that if I set attack bombers to attack airfield/port/city/ground targets between 1000-5000 feet they will always drop to 100 feet? That can be pretty devastating for the attack bombers fly against ground targets.

In my testing, yes from 6k down attack bombers will drop to 100 feet and strafe their target, no matter what mission they are on, excluding city attacks as I have not tested that.
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5556
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by Yaab »

Many thanks!
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Attack Bombers

Post by spence »

The original versions of the PV-1 deployed to the Pacific had a bombardier and 2 x .50 cal in the nose. In the field they were modified as well with a "chin pack" of 3 additional .50 cal added and the bombardier removed. From the AARs published by various PV-1 squadrons at VPNavy.com low level attacks were quite common. Later production of the PV-1 included the "chin pack"/no bombardier and the PV-2 included it right from the start. A special PV-2D version was contracted for the invasion of Japan and had 8 x .50 cal in the nose. Only about 30 of the 500 contracted for were completed before the Japanese surrendered and the contract was cancelled.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”