Naval and Defense News

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by NakedWeasel »

I'm aware of the convention. Blinding people is horrible, it's not just rhetoric.
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Dysta »

There are numerous amounts of methods to intentionally blind enemies, photonic is just a tip of an iceberg. Yet not all of them are strictly regulated, even pointing gun-attached lasers at citizen as a warning could possibly harm the eye too.

But we're strafing off the topic about Russian IR-killers. So I'm rather interested to see how it can pinpoint the incoming missiles' warhead sensor for jamming effect.
Triode
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 4:18 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Triode »

well if we look at characteristics of 5P-42-01 "Grach" (obviosly in export version):
Image

few interesting things:
the number of emitters 4 (2) (depending on the available power of the ship)
spectral range 0,35-2,5 µm (UV, visual,IR regions of the spectrum)
Time of continuous work 3 hours
Power 2,4 (1,2) kW

Automatic targeting sources of danger by the target designation of integrated combat management system of the ship
integration of station with a video surveillance systems of the ship
the ability to supply the station with its own video channel


This is smallest station in this family, IR,visual and small part of UV ,so called "black light" or UV-A range
Rudd
Posts: 468
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:34 am

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Rudd »

Saudi mmsc
http://dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/kingdo ... mmsc-ships
Four (4) MMSC ships (a derivative of the Freedom Variant of the U.S. Navy Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Class) that incorporate five (5) COMBATSS-21 Combat Management Systems (four (4) installed, one (1) spare) with five (5) TRS-4D Radars (four (4) installed, one (1) spare)

Five (5) Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) (Mode 4- and Mode 5-capable) UPX-29 (four (4) installed, one (1) spare)

Five (5) Compact Low Frequency Active Passive Variable Depth Sonar (four (4) installed, one (1) spare)

Eight (8) MK-41 Vertical Launch Systems (VLS) (two (2) eight-cell assemblies per ship for 16 cells per hull)

Five-hundred thirty-two (532) tactical RIM-162 Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles (ESSM) (one hundred twenty-eight (128) installed, twenty (20) test and training rounds, three hundred eighty-four (384) spares)

Five (5) AN/SWG-l (V) Harpoon Ship Command Launch Control Systems (four (4) installed (one (1) per ship), one (1) spare)

Eight (8) Harpoon Shipboard Launchers (two (2) installed four-tube assemblies per ship)

Forty-eight (48) RGM-84 Harpoon Block II Missiles (thirty-two (32) installed, sixteen (16) test and training rounds)

Five (5) MK-15 Mod 31 SeaRAM Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) (four (4) installed, one (1) spare)

One-hundred eighty-eight (188) RIM 116C Block II Rolling Airframe Missiles (RAM) (forty-four (44) installed, twelve (12) test and training rounds, one hundred thirty-two (132) spares)

Five (5) MK-75 76mm OTO Melara Gun Systems (four (4) installed, one (1) spare)

Forty-eight (48) 50-caliber machine guns (forty (40) installed (ten (10) per ship), eight (8) spares); ordnance; and Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM) Global Positioning System/Precise Positioning Service (GPS/PPS) navigation equipment
DESRON420
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 1:24 am

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by DESRON420 »

$1b+ per hull (MDE cost of $4.3b for 4 ships) vice $450m for an LCS.

Will be interesting to see what Future Frigate and related LCS backfits cost.
Broncepulido
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:12 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Broncepulido »

Laser dazzlers apparently employed in a few ships in the 1982 Falklands campaings, but not sure about it.
jtoatoktoe
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:38 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by jtoatoktoe »

F-16V took its first flight today. I wonder if the U.S. would consider investing in a upgrade until they deem the F-35 ready in force.

http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2015/10/21/Lockheed-Martins-F-16V-takes-flight/6261445429693/
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Dysta »

One of a Japanese news spectating the progress of Chinese home-build CV(s) recently. Guessimated that one more carrier construction projects begins along with the first one half a year ago.

http://ajw.asahi.com/article/asia/china/AJ201510210060
Hongjian
Posts: 841
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:11 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Hongjian »

Yeah, latest leaks showed that the hangar module is being installed on the 001A in Dalian.

Image
User avatar
xavierv
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 11:33 am
Contact:

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by xavierv »

Textron Systems Unveiled its Advanced Amphibious Craft for US Army MSV(L) and US Navy SC(X)R
Image
AUSA 2015 (Association of the US Army annual convention) may be an army event (which our affiliate website Army Recognition was covering) an eminently naval product was showcased for the first time, at the Textron Systems booth: The Advanced Amphibious Craft.
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... ew&id=3185
Triode
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 4:18 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Triode »

[ADDED DB v443]

News about 11442M Nakimov upgrade and UKSK capabilities

From official website of procurement of "Sevmash" (contract ¹31502887567) on the agreement with JSC"KBSM" for the manufacture and supply of ten universal vertical launchers (UKSK) 3S-14-11442M for repair and modernization of heavy nuclear missile cruiser "Admiral Nakhimov" Project 11442M.
"Production will be carried out on the basis of a joint decision ¹235/1/1/8565 of 6 November 2014. "Modification UKSK 3S-14-22350 for ability to use complexes 3K-14, 9K, 3K55, 3K-22 on 11442M"

So , Nakhmov will recive complex 3K-22 with missile 3M-22 , in other words "Zirkon"
Why is that a big deal? Because Onyx was always been temporally solution. True goal for UKSK was always Zirkon ,and finally Zirkon is coming, what we known about ZIrkon:
~1300 km (2013 year info from Navy demands, what actually achived in tests we dont know)
~7-8 mach (from interview with general designer of Zirkon)
~ flying high like Kh-32

Also, as you can see UKSK on Nakhimov capable of using "Kalibr" missiles (3K-14), Onyx (3K55) and something called 9K
Also as you can see Nakhimov will use 3S-14-22350 version of UKSK, this means 22350 "Gorshkov" also can use "Zirkon" ?
Possibilities,possibilities...[:)]
Broncepulido
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:12 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Broncepulido »

A very interesting long guide, including EW systems and radars, not much data and updated only to 2008, but sometimes including radar ranges: http://www.aerospace-index.com/images/2 ... wh2008.pdf
B52H
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:48 am

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by B52H »

The LCS will get OTH ASMs on its next deployment:
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defens ... /74477482/
User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by NakedWeasel »

U.S. warship sails within 12 miles of Chinese-built island in South China Sea
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Dysta »

Lassem is not alone.

http://news.ifeng.com/a/20151027/46013204_0.shtml (Chinese)

"Type 052D DDG Kunming monitored, followed and warned the US vessel. .."

Potential scenario: USS Lassem vs PLAN Kunming.

UPDATE: Not 052D as finally confirmed officially at post #317.
User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by NakedWeasel »

No. Because it will not stop there. The Lassen will not be the last US vessel that will sail into the area. China does not own the world. And if they want to see how the American people can and will react to provocation, they can always try to stop us.
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Dysta »

ORIGINAL: NakedWeasel

No. Because it will not stop there. The Lassen will not be the last US vessel that will sail into the area. China does not own the world. And if they want to see how the American people can and will react to provocation, they can always try to stop us.
That's exactly what Soviet Union did when provocation happens between two Diomedes.

-------------------

NEWS UPDATE:

It's confirmed that Chinese vessels watched and alarmed the Lassen was not 052D, but 052C and one extra 053H1.

That would be a slight disadvantage without all the dangerous stuffs from 052D, but still an assured missile trading event if sparks alight.

http://news.china.com/focus/nanhai/1115 ... 40639.html (Chinese)
User avatar
NakedWeasel
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:40 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by NakedWeasel »

More than likely, there were at least one or more US Navy subs in the area as well. Sinking the lassen would be an open invitation to a massive TLAM strike on that island. The PLAN would be well advised to use it's destroyers to defend against cruise missiles and stealth bombers, rather than a single destroyer.
Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Dysta »

ORIGINAL: NakedWeasel

More than likely, there were at least one or more US Navy subs in the area as well. Sinking the lassen would be an open invitation to a massive TLAM strike on that island. The PLAN would be well advised to use it's destroyers to defend against cruise missiles and stealth bombers, rather than a single destroyer.
You forget it's a air-hot area in SCS, US air patrols is much more frequent than ships and subs. So it makes sense for AA destroyers watch over it.
BrianinMinnie
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 3:12 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by BrianinMinnie »

HyperCat? StratoCat?, RamCat?


Northrop Grumman Wins The Contract To Produce America's Next Stealth Bomber
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”