Decision Costs Question

VR designs has been reinforced with designer Cameron Harris and the result is a revolutionary new operational war game 'Barbarossa' that plays like none other. It blends an advanced counter pushing engine with deep narrative, people management and in-depth semi-randomized decision systems.

Moderators: Vic, lancer

Post Reply
Frido1207
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:44 am
Location: Lower Saxony, Germany

Decision Costs Question

Post by Frido1207 »

What´s the point in the decision shown below, where I can spend 6PP or 0PP to get a 50% chance of a bad outcome?



Image
Attachments
decision.jpg
decision.jpg (152.29 KiB) Viewed 126 times
ryan1488
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:01 pm

RE: Decision Costs Question

Post by ryan1488 »

There are many choices like this. I am curious as well.
User avatar
willgamer
Posts: 900
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2002 11:35 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama

RE: Decision Costs Question

Post by willgamer »

Since Gerke brought the issue up, and I see F.M. von B. has an opinion on it, it may be that the difference is what and whose relationship status are adjusted.
Rex Lex or Lex Rex?
etsadler
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 7:41 pm

RE: Decision Costs Question

Post by etsadler »

Exactly. In this one von B wants the track converted as soon as possible, so choosing the 6pp options will make him happy and tick off Gercke to some degree. Doing nothing will, I believe, still tick off Gercke, but not get you any points with von B. In both cases there is a 50% chance that the Eisenbahntruppe will get negatively impacted.
Frido1207
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:44 am
Location: Lower Saxony, Germany

RE: Decision Costs Question

Post by Frido1207 »

Ah, I see. That makes sense. Thank you.
lancer
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:56 am

RE: Decision Costs Question

Post by lancer »

Hi,

That's about it.

Each option in a decision gives a unique outcome. No two options in a decision are the same.

Some of them involve a probability roll for an outcome.

The '% chance of a good/bad outcome' is there to allow you to estimate your chances rather than having it be hidden (which it was originally). But the probability of an outcome occurring is separate and independent of the actual outcome itself.

So while there may be two options in a decision that have an identical '50% chance of a bad outcome' they probably have different PP costs and would involve different outcomes.

Cheers,
Cameron
Post Reply

Return to “Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa”