Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
hughc61
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:57 pm

Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post by hughc61 »

Dear All,
Has anyone created a scenario of a conflict over the Spratelys between China and the USA and allies?

Merry Xmas!!!

regards,
Hugh
User avatar
ojms
Posts: 213
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:05 am

RE: Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post by ojms »

There are two that I can think of "Chianang Strike" (not sure on spelling) and "Play the Fool".

There is also the "seven powers" although I'm not sure if that was released.
Coiler12
Posts: 1268
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 10:11 pm
Contact:

RE: Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post by Coiler12 »

ORIGINAL: hughc61

Dear All,
Has anyone created a scenario of a conflict over the Spratelys between China and the USA and allies?

Merry Xmas!!!

regards,
Hugh

Besides Changjiang Strike and Play The Fool, you have Four Ounces Can Move One Thousand Pounds (against Japan), and The Five Powers (against Australia+SEA).
User avatar
ultradave
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:01 pm
Location: Rhode Island, USA

RE: Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post by ultradave »

South China Clash from the included standalone scenarios.
----------------
Dave A.
"When the Boogeyman goes to sleep he checks his closet for paratroopers"
User avatar
SeaQueen
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Washington D.C.

RE: Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post by SeaQueen »

The issue is less "scenario" and more "scenarios." That theater is HUGE.

ORIGINAL: hughc61

Dear All,
Has anyone created a scenario of a conflict over the Spratleys between China and the USA and allies?

Merry Xmas!!!

regards,
Hugh
FTBSS
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:17 am

RE: Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post by FTBSS »

I am hoping the next official campaign is set up as a modern day clash between the USA and Pacific allies against the Plan and North Korea (using modern weapons and some of the hypothetical units in development.

So first campaign was with CW DB and new campaign with DB 3000.

would love to see a clash of sm3 vrs df21 and df26 asbm stealth fighters and most modern AAM see the results, would also love a branching campaign based on score of scenario leading to different scenario and difficulty.
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post by Dysta »

ORIGINAL: FTBSS

I am hoping the next official campaign is set up as a modern day clash between the USA and Pacific allies against the Plan and North Korea (using modern weapons and some of the hypothetical units in development.

So first campaign was with CW DB and new campaign with DB 3000..
I prefer such campaign will lead into WWW, than WW3.
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12848
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post by Sardaukar »

"Play the Fool" is pretty good scenario, though I always chance USMC F-18A+ to F-35Bs or Super Hornets on CVN on editor, since plain F-18 is almost useless in other than "point defence"
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
SeaQueen
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Washington D.C.

RE: Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post by SeaQueen »

Ballistic missile defense scenarios against fixed targets are pretty easy to quickly cook up.

You just need to pick something you think might be a good target that's in range of the missile systems you think are interesting, lay a few ships down along the threat axis nearby to protect it, maybe add some land based SAMs, and a few opposing platforms which target the ships in addition to the thing the ship is trying to protect, and you're done. The rest is just tweaking details, which is what wargames are all about, ultimately. Raid schedules, positioning the ships, firing doctrine, defending the things meant to defend other things... that's the name of the game.

Ballistic missile defense against moving targets is a harder scenario to make because you have to think very carefully about the ISR problem for the ballistic missiles. If you're going to shoot "carrier killing" missiles at an aircraft carrier, something has to find it for you to shoot at it. It might be submarines, aircraft, shore based radars, satellites or surface ships. The result is a pretty big scenario pretty quickly.

would love to see a clash of sm3 vrs df21 and df26 asbm stealth fighters and most modern AAM see the results, would also love a branching campaign based on score of scenario leading to different scenario and difficulty.
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: Spratley Conlicts China v USA Etc

Post by Dysta »

ORIGINAL: SeaQueen

Ballistic missile defense scenarios against fixed targets are pretty easy to quickly cook up.

I am more likely afraid they're intended to make US deploy more SAMs in batteries/canisters than typical naval loadout, if LRASM and TACTOM are also needed in this scenario. Sure, bring 2 fleets togethers will make short work of Chinese missiles, but don't forget ballistic missiles are very flexible to be used in duel-purposes, and not just DF-2X series they have to deal with.

Ultimately, if China's real target is not the US, but also whatever targets that could gain their positions to deceiving, or diverting attention to another theater of campaign, then you are expecting inferno in Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea before the US can protect them all, which is also their stragedic bases.

But then this is an ultimate nuclear holocaust, I hope every factions are ready for '1 hour cold war' before hell break loose.
Post Reply

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”