The Mechanical SC3 Thread

Fury Games has now signed with Matrix Games, and we are working together on the next Strategic Command. Will use the Slitherine PBEM++ server for asynchronous multi-player.

Moderators: MOD_Strategic_Command_3, Fury Software

Post Reply
SeaMonkey
Posts: 796
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:18 am

The Mechanical SC3 Thread

Post by SeaMonkey »

For anticipation of the arrival of SC3 mechanics for discussion in this new year of 2016 this thread will hopefully catalyze some developer comments on what will be new(remote hints) and what will be kept from the SC series of the past.

1. Supply: same, slight modifications, different, or vastly changed?

2. Movement: strategic and operational with some tactical concepts?

3. Combat: modes, air, ground and naval.

4. Unit attributes: the algorithms of features like morale, readiness, experience, leader enhancements, etc.

5. Terrain effects, a semblance of the past or some imaginative tweaks?

6. Game ending victory / defeat evaluation parameters.

There are more, sure some of the loyalists would like to add, but likely the usual non-interaction will make this a "one post pony"!

Before I resume my Winter slumber, my guess, in that Beta has not even begun, we are still a year away, perhaps this time next year!

ZZZzzzz
User avatar
battlevonwar
Posts: 1233
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:17 am

RE: The Mechanical SC3 Thread

Post by battlevonwar »

I am glad you're looking forward to this. I am open minded to whatever is to come I haven't seen a grand strategy ETO in such a long time.

As for fine aspects there are a lot of titles out there that have great qualities. Though balance got knocked off. I remember my favorite war game release in the past 3 years has been (new one) Commander The Great War. Great interface, beautiful and very smooth. Then they got bogged down in actually breaking a working interface. Was odd... I don't know if they ever fixed it. Though too many little tweaks you can actually destroy a game. Though the wrong kind lead to over exploitation. I remember the old SC1 and I absolutely adored it and SC2 was extremely deep. I don't think I ever mastered the 2nd game engine at all. Just so much detail... still all the little bits and pieces add elements for future game play.
User avatar
EdwinP
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 7:34 pm

RE: The Mechanical SC3 Thread

Post by EdwinP »

7. Scenarios: Will there be a scenario using the smaller map from the SC1/SC2 series? For a faster playing ETO game with fewer units.
sophiajoyce75
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 5:59 am

RE: The Mechanical SC3 Thread

Post by sophiajoyce75 »

free software download
James Taylor
Posts: 700
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Contact:

RE: The Mechanical SC3 Thread

Post by James Taylor »

So any chance of double airstrikes by TAC bombers?

How about armies of high supply and readiness?

Hopefully we'll see smaller formations have a lesser chance of taking damage by combat as their footprint decreases(manpower shrinkage).
SeaMonkey
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII War in Europe”