Sevastopol

VR designs has been reinforced with designer Cameron Harris and the result is a revolutionary new operational war game 'Barbarossa' that plays like none other. It blends an advanced counter pushing engine with deep narrative, people management and in-depth semi-randomized decision systems.

Moderators: Vic, lancer

Post Reply
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 32119
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

Sevastopol

Post by Orm »

Should not Sevastopol be worth more victory points. As it is now there are no real incentive for Germany to divert forces to Crimea. Other than to block the Soviet forces trapped there.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

A government is a body of people; usually, notably, ungoverned. - Quote from Firefly
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Sevastopol

Post by Gunnulf »

Possibly, plus that being a major city would give it the abilty to receive a proper garrison which would be more befitting its historical fortifications. And Stalin would no doubt rage if it were lost. Maybe its a balance decision on that basis to limit a little how many paranoid rages Stalin can have.

As it is then I believe the incentive for the Germans to divert forces there is to win in the southern sector you need Rostov and either Sevastopol or Kharkov. Usually I imagine folks take Kharkov as its more on the axis of advance, more difficult to defend for the soviets, and Germany is usually fairly unlikely to reach Rostov if can't take Kharkov. As it is the difference in PPs between major and minor cities isn't huge, they are all worth taking.
"Stay low, move fast"
lancer
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:56 am

RE: Sevastopol

Post by lancer »

Hi Orm,

It's kept as a minor city in order to give the Germans a fighting chance of taking it.

Making it a major city would, as Gunnulf has pointed out, allow for a major garrison. It's also an easily defended area with the Perekop Isthmus.

As the Soviets are spread fairly thin in AGS they'll usually prioritise the defence of Kharkov and provide some scope for an alternative strategy for the German Player.

Cheers,
Cameron
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 32119
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: Sevastopol

Post by Orm »

While I understand your reasoning I do not agree with it.

As Germany I would not invest any real forces to advance toward Sevastopol with no real reward. Why waste time and effort on it when there are other cities that are easier to capture. Even better if USSR waste energy on putting troops there.

And as Soviet Union I would be happy if Germany diverted forces towards Crimea. Maybe placing a minor garrison or two to slow the German invasion of Crimea down.

As I see it there is no reason for either reason to make a historical campaign towards Crimea.

With that said I should mention that I am still a novice learning this game. So what do I know. [:D]
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

A government is a body of people; usually, notably, ungoverned. - Quote from Firefly
lancer
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:56 am

RE: Sevastopol

Post by lancer »

Hi Orm,

As mentioned in another post the Crimea, in general, could do with a make over in order to make it a more attractive German target.

Cheers,
Cameron
Post Reply

Return to “Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa”