Rumble in the Southwest witpqs-A vs Andav-J 2011-11-29 to 2017-02-08

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 18

Post by witpqs »

Okinawa.

Image
Attachments
19441119Okinawa.jpg
19441119Okinawa.jpg (695.03 KiB) Viewed 367 times
Drakanel
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2015 12:59 pm

RE: 1944 November 18

Post by Drakanel »

Both predictions were wrong! [:D]

I am not surprised by Tokunoshima to be honest. I expected that at least another attack would be necessary. But Naha, meh. Not even a fort reduction. You have to use a bigger stick!

At least Batavia has been retaken. guess it won't be long before poor Singapore starts getting bombarded.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 18

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Drakanel

Both predictions were wrong! [:D]

I am not surprised by Tokunoshima to be honest. I expected that at least another attack would be necessary. But Naha, meh. Not even a fort reduction. You have to use a bigger stick!

At least Batavia has been retaken. guess it won't be long before poor Singapore starts getting bombarded.
No, not too long now for Singapore. I want the very first strike to be a surprise, which means it will have to be launched before Batavia airfield is fully built out, and before Allied ground forces are too close to Singapore. It will be a port strike with all the 4EB that can be stuffed into Batavia at whatever size it is then.

Naha - I guess it just still needs all the naval bombardments it can get, plus good die rolls. Not sure how many days they will need to rest this time. But after tomorrow there will be 2x old BB bombardments each day plus the cruisers. The Iowas will be thrown in at least once during the troops' recovery.

Some of the heavy cruisers that have been bombarding are in dire need of yard time. I wonder when Hong Kong will be available?
User avatar
Crackaces
Posts: 3858
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:39 pm

RE: 1944 November 18

Post by Crackaces »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

ORIGINAL: Drakanel

Both predictions were wrong! [:D]

I am not surprised by Tokunoshima to be honest. I expected that at least another attack would be necessary. But Naha, meh. Not even a fort reduction. You have to use a bigger stick!

At least Batavia has been retaken. guess it won't be long before poor Singapore starts getting bombarded.
No, not too long now for Singapore. I want the very first strike to be a surprise, which means it will have to be launched before Batavia airfield is fully built out, and before Allied ground forces are too close to Singapore. It will be a port strike with all the 4EB that can be stuffed into Batavia at whatever size it is then.

Naha - I guess it just still needs all the naval bombardments it can get, plus good die rolls. Not sure how many days they will need to rest this time. But after tomorrow there will be 2x old BB bombardments each day plus the cruisers. The Iowas will be thrown in at least once during the troops' recovery.

Some of the heavy cruisers that have been bombarding are in dire need of yard time. I wonder when Hong Kong will be available?

Hmmmm .. I'm not sure a bigger stick is needed as much as a steady attack. At some point we are going to see the (-) Supply and at that point no squads are recovering .. its all downhill from there
The Allies keep the supply up .. the IJ burn it up .. simple formula

I am rather impressed at Witpqs attention to resting units on Naha and bringing them into combat as disruption reaches a point
The detailed management is going to be a huge factor in the end in my opinion ...
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 18

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Crackaces

ORIGINAL: witpqs

ORIGINAL: Drakanel

Both predictions were wrong! [:D]

I am not surprised by Tokunoshima to be honest. I expected that at least another attack would be necessary. But Naha, meh. Not even a fort reduction. You have to use a bigger stick!

At least Batavia has been retaken. guess it won't be long before poor Singapore starts getting bombarded.
No, not too long now for Singapore. I want the very first strike to be a surprise, which means it will have to be launched before Batavia airfield is fully built out, and before Allied ground forces are too close to Singapore. It will be a port strike with all the 4EB that can be stuffed into Batavia at whatever size it is then.

Naha - I guess it just still needs all the naval bombardments it can get, plus good die rolls. Not sure how many days they will need to rest this time. But after tomorrow there will be 2x old BB bombardments each day plus the cruisers. The Iowas will be thrown in at least once during the troops' recovery.

Some of the heavy cruisers that have been bombarding are in dire need of yard time. I wonder when Hong Kong will be available?

Hmmmm .. I'm not sure a bigger stick is needed as much as a steady attack. At some point we are going to see the (-) Supply and at that point no squads are recovering .. its all downhill from there
The Allies keep the supply up .. the IJ burn it up .. simple formula

I am rather impressed at Witpqs attention to resting units on Naha and bringing them into combat as disruption reaches a point
The detailed management is going to be a huge factor in the end in my opinion ...
Well, this time around they rested too long, meaning that the defenders got too much of a break. But with so many more ammo ships in place at Daito Shoto now, that should change.

Supply I am not so sure about. At this place I suspect DAW HQ brought in enough supply to use as barricades, the idea being to force us to overcome the defenders because starving them to weaken them would take too long.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

1944 November 19

Post by witpqs »

1944 November 19

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:
Allied forces CAPTURE Tokunoshima !!!
Allied forces CAPTURE Bandoeng !!!
Allied forces CAPTURE Kota Bharu !!!

There were Imperial amphibious or airborne operations at:


There were Allied amphibious or airborne operations at:


Imperial Naval Bombardments


Allied Naval Bombardments:
Allied Ships Bombarding Naha
Allied Ships Bombarding Tokunoshima
Allied Ships Bombarding Siberoet


Our subs had more skirmishes, and one hit a mine at Batu Pahat. O16 is limping back to Alor Star.

The crossing to Wuchow is open.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at 76,58 (near Wuchow)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 6924 troops, 21 guns, 1195 vehicles, Assault Value = 680

Defending force 4968 troops, 22 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 167

Allied adjusted assault: 405

Japanese adjusted defense: 21

Allied assault odds: 19 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(+), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2538 casualties reported
Squads: 68 destroyed, 129 disabled
Non Combat: 27 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 24 (11 destroyed, 13 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Allied ground losses:
48 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 18 (1 destroyed, 17 disabled)

Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
Provisionl Tank Brigade
711th Tank Battalion
192nd Tank Battalion
632nd Tank Destroyer Battalion
640th Tank Destroyer Battalion
775th Tank Battalion
706th Tank Battalion
2/4th Armoured Regiment
671th Tank Destroyer Battalion
2/6th Armoured Regiment

Defending units:
60th Infantry Brigade


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at 70,45 (near Kunming)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 612 troops, 61 guns, 51 vehicles, Assault Value = 735

Defending force 17317 troops, 110 guns, 1 vehicles, Assault Value = 508

Assaulting units:
30th Chinese Corps
11th (East African) Division
3rd Prov Chinese Corps
272/273rd Bty 80th AT Gun Regiment
6th Mixed A/T Mtr Regiment
7th War Area

Defending units:
69th Infantry Brigade
57th Infantry Brigade
116th/C Division


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The armor is making way to cross into Wuchow at once. There are 23,000 troops there, but only 9,000 were there before the two Bdes crossed from the forest, and both have been retreated including one of them twice.

Over at Nanning, movement is still seen out of the city toward the east, and the hex between Nanning and Liuchow is now empty. The 2EB air strikes were very effective in spite of the terrain and should be again as our ground troops cross the river tomorrow.

Troop count at Samah (on Hainan) has fallen from something like 9,000 to 1,500 in the last couple of days. Our units are in position and will attack tomorrow.

Kota Bharu falls.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Kota Bharu (51,75)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 2397 troops, 10 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 106

Defending force 1866 troops, 0 guns, 5 vehicles, Assault Value = 25

Allied adjusted assault: 38

Japanese adjusted defense: 5

Allied assault odds: 7 to 1 (fort level 2)

Allied forces CAPTURE Kota Bharu !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: preparation(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: leaders(+), leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
1115 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 14 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 43 destroyed, 7 disabled
Vehicles lost 5 (5 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 2

Allied ground losses:
110 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 27 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
BFF Brigade

Defending units:
20th Engineer Regiment
5th Field Construction Battalion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first armoured units have arrived at Kuala Lumpur to find 3 enemy units there. They will wait for the remainder of the armour to arrive tomorrow before attacking the next day.

The IJN might have been testing the waters with forming these small convoys.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Singapore at 50,84

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 7,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Allied aircraft
Beaufighter VIc x 10

Allied aircraft losses
Beaufighter VIc: 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
AG Irako, Bomb hits 3, on fire
AKE Misaku Maru, Shell hits 4, Bomb hits 6, heavy fires, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
10 x Beaufighter VIc bombing from 100 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 lb SAP Bomb



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Singapore at 50,84

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 22 NM, estimated altitude 1,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Allied aircraft
Mosquito FB.VI x 7

Allied aircraft losses
Mosquito FB.VI: 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
AD Juko Maru, Bomb hits 5, on fire
AKE Misaku Maru, Shell hits 7, Bomb hits 6, and is sunk

Aircraft Attacking:
7 x Mosquito FB.VI bombing from 100 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 500 lb SAP Bomb



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bandoeng captured, Batavia secured.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Bandoeng (50,100)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 9672 troops, 100 guns, 92 vehicles, Assault Value = 324

Defending force 3343 troops, 102 guns, 47 vehicles, Assault Value = 18

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Allied adjusted assault: 153

Japanese adjusted defense: 61

Allied assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Bandoeng !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
356 casualties reported
Squads: 13 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 18 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 8 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 50 (43 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Vehicles lost 41 (41 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
130 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 19 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
31st Infantry Regiment
158th(Sep) Infantry Regiment
2/8th Ind Coy
2/6 Commando Battalion
2/9 Commando Battalion
2nd Fiji Commando Battalion
Provisional GMC Grp

Defending units:
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
III/81st Naval Guard Unit
61st JNAF AF Unit
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Mortar Battalion
92nd JAAF AF Bn


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 5868 troops, 221 guns, 113 vehicles, Assault Value = 152

Defending force 1964 troops, 19 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 8

Allied adjusted assault: 64

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 64 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), preparation(-), fatigue(-)
experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
727 casualties reported
Squads: 47 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 31 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 12 (8 destroyed, 4 disabled)

Assaulting units:
2/1st Ind Coy
2/2nd Ind Coy
30th Australian Brigade
462nd Airborn Field Artillery Battalion
148th Field Artillery Battalion
134th Field Artillery Battalion
147th Field Artillery Battalion
131st Field Artillery Battalion
205th Field Artillery Battalion
260th Field Artillery Battalion
2nd RAA Jungle Regiment

Defending units:
78th Naval Guard Unit
35th JNAF AF Unit


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

78th Naval Guard Unit Wiped Out at Batavia by attrition!!!

Japanese Unit(s) surrounded at Batavia

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All mines are cleared at Oosthaven so the mine sweepers are moving to Batavia.

Tokunoshima falls.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Tokunoshima (97,65)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 24158 troops, 406 guns, 262 vehicles, Assault Value = 709

Defending force 6819 troops, 53 guns, 9 vehicles, Assault Value = 75

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Allied adjusted assault: 657

Japanese adjusted defense: 7

Allied assault odds: 93 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Tokunoshima !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1602 casualties reported
Squads: 61 destroyed, 27 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 30 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 21 (10 destroyed, 11 disabled)
Vehicles lost 8 (8 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
23 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Assaulting units:
7th Infantry Division
98th Infantry Division

Defending units:
57th Ind.Mixed Brigade
6th South Seas Det.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The base is undamaged: engineers and a base force will begin landing tomorrow. The troops are still in great shape and will continue attacking to secure the island.

The troops at Naha are recovering well but of course require more time. AV is 1,949. Still some trouble getting the Iowas rearmed, I think that perhaps the loading of supply into the various AE/AKE got in the way.

China. Still lots of supply problems for us in the mountains.

Image
Attachments
19441120China.jpg
19441120China.jpg (721.57 KiB) Viewed 367 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 19

Post by witpqs »

Malay Peninsula & Sumatra.

Image
Attachments
19441120Peninsula.jpg
19441120Peninsula.jpg (493.81 KiB) Viewed 367 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 19

Post by witpqs »

Java Sea.

Image
Attachments
19441120JavaSea.jpg
19441120JavaSea.jpg (381.95 KiB) Viewed 367 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 19

Post by witpqs »

Okinawa.

Image
Attachments
19441120Okinawa.jpg
19441120Okinawa.jpg (712.72 KiB) Viewed 367 times
Drakanel
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2015 12:59 pm

RE: 1944 November 19

Post by Drakanel »

How useful is tokunoshima as a base? Can it be used for air/naval support of the Okinawa operation?

It's a bit bothersome that you can't seem to use those bombardment task forces consistently. I mean, it worked before for days.. and now you are being slowed down on the bombardments....

User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 19

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Drakanel

How useful is tokunoshima as a base? Can it be used for air/naval support of the Okinawa operation?

It's a bit bothersome that you can't seem to use those bombardment task forces consistently. I mean, it worked before for days.. and now you are being slowed down on the bombardments....

Tokunoshima can build to airfield size 6, so definitely useful that way. Corsair squadrons are waiting to fly in as soon as the runway is ready. As a port, no I don't think it will be any help.

The good run of bombardments was until the AE/AKE began to run dry. The interruptions now are because some were still topping off their supplies. What I will do is just let them draw down again without trying to top off. When they go dry I will use a couple of cruiser TFs only until they have refilled to support full cycle bombardments.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20742
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: 1944 November 19

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

ORIGINAL: Drakanel

How useful is tokunoshima as a base? Can it be used for air/naval support of the Okinawa operation?

It's a bit bothersome that you can't seem to use those bombardment task forces consistently. I mean, it worked before for days.. and now you are being slowed down on the bombardments....

Tokunoshima can build to airfield size 6, so definitely useful that way. Corsair squadrons are waiting to fly in as soon as the runway is ready. As a port, no I don't think it will be any help.

The good run of bombardments was until the AE/AKE began to run dry. The interruptions now are because some were still topping off their supplies. What I will do is just let them draw down again without trying to top off. When they go dry I will use a couple of cruiser TFs only until they have refilled to support full cycle bombardments.
Spreading out the AKEs/AEs to several bases will enable you to have more ops points to reload supplies on them. I would put an AKE at a smaller base and use that to top up CLs and DDs. The problem with loading the Iowas could be ops-point related or size of AE. You need something like 5200 ton capacity to arm those guns and there is a 5400 ton capacity AE available by converting the xAKs that had the 5800 ton capacity. I think there is even one size larger AE the allies can make but IIRC it meant using up a fast ship that was needed for fast amphib forces.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 19

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: witpqs

ORIGINAL: Drakanel

How useful is tokunoshima as a base? Can it be used for air/naval support of the Okinawa operation?

It's a bit bothersome that you can't seem to use those bombardment task forces consistently. I mean, it worked before for days.. and now you are being slowed down on the bombardments....

Tokunoshima can build to airfield size 6, so definitely useful that way. Corsair squadrons are waiting to fly in as soon as the runway is ready. As a port, no I don't think it will be any help.

The good run of bombardments was until the AE/AKE began to run dry. The interruptions now are because some were still topping off their supplies. What I will do is just let them draw down again without trying to top off. When they go dry I will use a couple of cruiser TFs only until they have refilled to support full cycle bombardments.
Spreading out the AKEs/AEs to several bases will enable you to have more ops points to reload supplies on them. I would put an AKE at a smaller base and use that to top up CLs and DDs. The problem with loading the Iowas could be ops-point related or size of AE. You need something like 5200 ton capacity to arm those guns and there is a 5400 ton capacity AE available by converting the xAKs that had the 5800 ton capacity. I think there is even one size larger AE the allies can make but IIRC it meant using up a fast ship that was needed for fast amphib forces.
The Iowas rearmed fine from the smaller number of AE/AKE when Daito Shoto was a size 1 port (now it's 2), so I know that equation is covered.

There has been no place else to spread things out. Sailing all the way to Iwo Jima adds several days to the round trip, which does not solve the problem. Now that Tokunoshima is ours, I still won't post any there. Too vulnerable. When we get Naha that will be more defensible.
User avatar
Rafid
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2015 3:26 pm

RE: 1944 November 19

Post by Rafid »

That "supply(-)" in the forest accross the river from Wuchow doesn't bode well for Andav. That unit has been out of contact with the enemy for some time and had open supply pathes to many bases including Hong Kong during that time.

Either it is a one time effect or he has barely enough supply in that whole area.

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: 1944 November 19

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: Rafid

That "supply(-)" in the forest accross the river from Wuchow doesn't bode well for Andav. That unit has been out of contact with the enemy for some time and had open supply pathes to many bases including Hong Kong during that time.

Either it is a one time effect or he has barely enough supply in that whole area.


The supply malus activates for as few as one unit I believe.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 19

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: Rafid

That "supply(-)" in the forest accross the river from Wuchow doesn't bode well for Andav. That unit has been out of contact with the enemy for some time and had open supply pathes to many bases including Hong Kong during that time.

Either it is a one time effect or he has barely enough supply in that whole area.


The supply malus activates for as few as one unit I believe.
I noticed that too. We'll be taking some LI away from the Empire with Nanning and Wuchow, a little additional with Canton, and then a lot more with Hong Kong.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

1944 November 20

Post by witpqs »

1944 November 20

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:
Allied forces CAPTURE Nanning !!!

There were Imperial amphibious or airborne operations at:


There were Allied amphibious or airborne operations at:


Imperial Naval Bombardments


Allied Naval Bombardments:
Allied Ships Bombarding enemy troops at Tokunoshima
Allied Ships Bombarding Naha
Allied Ships Bombarding Naha
Allied Ships Bombarding Naha
Allied Ships Bombarding Naha


Our subs had no action.

Nanning is ours again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Nanning (72,55)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 68030 troops, 707 guns, 354 vehicles, Assault Value = 1941

Defending force 5170 troops, 34 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 158

Allied adjusted assault: 2858

Japanese adjusted defense: 7

Allied assault odds: 408 to 1 (fort level 5)

Allied forces CAPTURE Nanning !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), leaders(+), disruption(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
3116 casualties reported
Squads: 85 destroyed, 120 disabled
Non Combat: 35 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 9 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 38 (31 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Allied ground losses:
1566 casualties reported
Squads: 10 destroyed, 129 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Vehicles lost 15 (1 destroyed, 14 disabled)

Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
88th Chinese Division
22nd Australian Brigade
8th New Chinese Corps
3rd New Chinese Corps
23rd Australian Brigade
4th Armoured Brigade
36th Chinese Division
27th Australian Brigade
2/5th Armoured Regiment
96th Chinese Division
9th Australian Division
30th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
25th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
32nd Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
33rd Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
27th Indian Field Artillery Battalion
31st Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
21st Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
22nd Indian Mountain Gun Regiment

Defending units:
61st Infantry Brigade


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at 69,52 (near Lao Cai)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 6419 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 197

Defending force 3325 troops, 27 guns, 4 vehicles, Assault Value = 96

Allied adjusted assault: 203

Japanese adjusted defense: 37

Allied assault odds: 5 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(+), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+)

Japanese ground losses:
54 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
16 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
86th Chinese Corps

Defending units:
104th/B Division


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Samah (69,63)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 6045 troops, 42 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 253

Defending force 6109 troops, 43 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 21

Allied adjusted assault: 201

Japanese adjusted defense: 51

Allied assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 6)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 5

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
215 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
475th USA Regiment
Lushai Brigade

Defending units:
2nd Fleet
Kainan Naval Base Force


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Despite disruption from the river crossing, all units are moving east to try and catch the enemy that exited the city before the attack. A number of base forces are moving in by strat road movement from Lang Son and should arrive in one or two days. Samah actually had 6,000 troops but is lacking in AV - so it seems the combat squads have been flown out. The attack there and on the zombies will continue tomorrow. Day after tomorrow for the crossing attack into Wuchow.

We got 19x Light Industry and 19x Resources in good working order at Nanning.

Still moving on the Malay Peninsula & Sumatra. Attack at Kuala Lumpur tomorrow.

Bandoeng is a resistance hideout.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Bandoeng (50,100)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 9604 troops, 100 guns, 92 vehicles, Assault Value = 313

Defending force 2622 troops, 62 guns, 18 vehicles, Assault Value = 13

Allied adjusted assault: 145

Japanese adjusted defense: 19

Allied assault odds: 7 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
274 casualties reported
Squads: 6 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 23 (21 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Vehicles lost 4 (2 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
28 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
158th(Sep) Infantry Regiment
2/9 Commando Battalion
31st Infantry Regiment
2/6 Commando Battalion
2/8th Ind Coy
2nd Fiji Commando Battalion
Provisional GMC Grp

Defending units:
3rd Mortar Battalion
61st JNAF AF Unit
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
III/81st Naval Guard Unit
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
92nd JAAF AF Bn


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment Wiped Out at Bandoeng by attrition!!!
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment Wiped Out at Bandoeng by attrition!!!
3rd Mortar Battalion Wiped Out at Bandoeng by attrition!!!
III/81st Naval Guard Unit Wiped Out at Bandoeng by attrition!!!
61st JNAF AF Unit Wiped Out at Bandoeng by attrition!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But there are only hold outs from 1 unit remaining. Batavia is clear of mines. Engineers are on site and unpacking. Combat units are moving out from Oosthaven.

Tokunoshima is secured.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Tokunoshima (97,65)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 24185 troops, 405 guns, 262 vehicles, Assault Value = 711

Defending force 5504 troops, 43 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 7

Allied adjusted assault: 649

Japanese adjusted defense: 5

Allied assault odds: 129 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1326 casualties reported
Squads: 169 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 72 destroyed, 21 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 27 (27 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Allied ground losses:
34 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
7th Infantry Division
98th Infantry Division

Defending units:
57th Ind.Mixed Brigade
6th South Seas Det.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Japanese Unit(s) surrounded at Tokunoshima
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was also this convoy that strayed too far south.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Fukue-jima at 98,58

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid detected at 35 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 13 minutes

Allied aircraft
F6F-3 Hellcat x 6
SBD-3 Dauntless x 2

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
xAK Hakusika Maru, Bomb hits 1, on fire

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 4000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All troops at Naha need rest, but only our troops are getting it, because the rearming cycle at Daito Shoto is back in full swing. AV at Naha is 1,978. Two fleet CV TF are retiring to Guam to rearm. At the rate that dive bombers are being shot down by enemy CAP, getting replacement planes is a capital idea, too.

China.

Image
Attachments
19441121China.jpg
19441121China.jpg (821.55 KiB) Viewed 371 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 20

Post by witpqs »

Malay Peninsula & Sumatra.

Image
Attachments
19441121Peninsula.jpg
19441121Peninsula.jpg (504.18 KiB) Viewed 371 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 20

Post by witpqs »

Java Sea.

Image
Attachments
19441121JavaSea.jpg
19441121JavaSea.jpg (377.7 KiB) Viewed 371 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1944 November 20

Post by witpqs »

Okinawa.

Image
Attachments
19441121Okinawa.jpg
19441121Okinawa.jpg (712.75 KiB) Viewed 371 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”