Wish List

The sequel of the legendary wargame with a complete graphics and interface overhaul, major new gameplay and design features such as full naval combat modelling, improved supply handling, numerous increases to scenario parameters to better support large scenarios, and integrated PBEM++.
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5475
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: Wish List

Post by Lobster »

ORIGINAL: Meyer1

Lobster, I'm sure he meant the "Desert war" game as being still in work.

Ah thank you. I really wasn't sure which game was 'the game'. [:D]
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5475
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: Wish List

Post by Lobster »

Bah...sorry bout the double post. [;)]
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
User avatar
ncc1701e
Posts: 10721
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:50 pm
Location: Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards

RE: Wish List

Post by ncc1701e »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: draske

Another thing I would like to see is adding armygroup (so XXXXX) as selectable option. I like to make big scenario's and this often represent HQ units of this level.

See this thread:

tm.asp?m=1730915

Yes, there is a workaround. But, why not integrate it directly into the game?

Same thing for the third parties equipement or scenario editors, there are existing because there is a gap. Is it not time to integrate all them into TOAW IV?

And my last wish is a kind of dream, create a common agreed equipment database with hopefully more records possible within a single file.

Just my wish list... since I have already understood no change of formation within one order of battle will be allowed during game [:(]
Chancellor Gorkon to Captain James T. Kirk:
You don't trust me, do you? I don't blame you. If there is to be a brave new world, our generation is going to have the hardest time living in it.
kukudas
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 10:03 am
Location: South Korea

RE: Wish List

Post by kukudas »

Can you guys add in-game drawing tools for mark defense line or advance line?
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42735
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

RE: Wish List

Post by larryfulkerson »

Can you guys add in-game drawing tools for mark defense line or advance line?
That's a fantastic idea........like a grease pencil for the game map. Cool idea. It would be fabulous if we had a tool like that.
Trump's UN Speech Went Full DEMENTIA! - ft. Christopher Hitchens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTTiuJZeS0Q
PawelS
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 12:52 pm

RE: Wish List

Post by PawelS »

Things I'd like to see in TOAW4:

[*] An option to change the level of randomness in combat results, from highly random to deterministic - such option exists in Panzer Corps, for example.
[*] Ability to attach small units (those that don't have significant combat strength) to other units of the same formation, to reduce micromanagement. For example I'd like to be able to attach a small anti-tank unit to an infantry unit, or a small artillery unit to the HQ. A unit with attachments would be treated as a single unit.
[*] An option to disable unit splitting as a result of combat.
[*] An option to disable changing the loss tolerance to Minimize Losses as a result of combat.

Edit: One more thing - units disbanded by the player shouldn't reconstitute.
User avatar
berto
Posts: 21461
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2002 1:15 am
Location: metro Chicago, Illinois, USA
Contact:

RE: Wish List

Post by berto »


<bump>
ORIGINAL: berto

The first of my many wishes: For turn/phase resolution and playback, please give the option to play back, stop-and-start (via some hot key) individual unit/stack movement; individual battle; etc.

Not continuous, not from beginning to end without pause! Too fast for me, still too fast even with the slow-down option.

Or if not step-by-step, then continuous, but with the ability to pause the action at any time (by toggling the space bar, for example).

This may be my personal biggest problem with the older, traditional TOAW UI. I've got other complaints. But this one is maybe at the top of my list. The single biggest thing (there are others) that detracts from my enjoyment of the game.
Campaign Series Legion https://cslegion.com/
Campaign Series Lead Coder https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... hp?f=10167
Panzer Campaigns, Panzer Battles Lead Coder https://wargameds.com
Post Reply

Return to “The Operational Art of War IV”