Islands of Destiny: RA 5.0 Japanese Side

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by John 3rd »

SIDE NOTE: With the update I just did for all the Mods, it really struck me just how different this Mod is now several years AFTER Dan and I started this game. Huge and I mean HUGE differences...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock



Congratulations! (Mind you, after eight months, I imagine some of His Imperial Majesty's soldiers will be more than eager to depart.)

Eight months tied up in a back water that should have already been secured, not conquering more territory or strengthening the perimeter......

Appears to have been a very sound Allied strategy in spite of the losses.

Time will tell ... [;)]

There is no should have been involved here. The Allies are behind historical and down 150k troops! Sounds like an Allied victory to me!

Hip hip hurray!! [:D]


Nothing about an ahistorical scenario is supposed to be historical, so there is no "behind historical".

Just thought I would point that out. [;)]
Hans

User avatar
Grfin Zeppelin
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Germany

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by Grfin Zeppelin »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: HansBolter




Eight months tied up in a back water that should have already been secured, not conquering more territory or strengthening the perimeter......

Appears to have been a very sound Allied strategy in spite of the losses.

Time will tell ... [;)]

There is no should have been involved here. The Allies are behind historical and down 150k troops! Sounds like an Allied victory to me!

Hip hip hurray!! [:D]


Nothing about an ahistorical scenario is supposed to be historical, so there is no "behind historical".

Just thought I would point that out. [;)]
Image

Image
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by John 3rd »

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by HansBolter »

Come on guys, I just thought this thread needed a 'devil's advocate' AFB to throw some water on the excessive JFB celebrating. [:D]

If I'm not appreciated I can go away. [&:]
Hans

User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6427
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: HansBolter




Eight months tied up in a back water that should have already been secured, not conquering more territory or strengthening the perimeter......

Appears to have been a very sound Allied strategy in spite of the losses.

Time will tell ... [;)]

There is no should have been involved here. The Allies are behind historical and down 150k troops! Sounds like an Allied victory to me!

Hip hip hurray!! [:D]

What obvert said AND...BACK WATER? I'd say a Sz-9 AF that could directly threaten nearly every oil production facility in the DEI is not BACK WATER.

Maybe I am crazy there...perhaps...NOT!
And you have a house rule which nerfs Strategic bombing.

It may have been part of your strategy, but while you had Dan committed to Sabang you couldhave been bashing him hard elsewhere.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by Lowpe »

I personally don't think John could have attacked somewhere else and scored as many permanent VP as he did in fighting at Sabang.

Perth is a place where you can sometimes destroy quite a few land combat units. Burma and southern India is another.

User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

Come on guys, I just thought this thread needed a 'devil's advocate' AFB to throw some water on the excessive JFB celebrating. [:D]

If I'm not appreciated I can go away. [&:]

No Worries. I'm usually taking that role Hans, you just took this one for me!! [:D]

But I really do think the Allies will feel this one.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by Capt. Harlock »

ORIGINAL: Gräfin Zeppelin



Nothing about an ahistorical scenario is supposed to be historical, so there is no "behind historical".

Just thought I would point that out. [;)]
Image
[/quote]

I have no objections to lots of responses to my post . . . but WHERE did you get that emoji?
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Grfin Zeppelin
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Germany

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by Grfin Zeppelin »

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock

ORIGINAL: Gräfin Zeppelin



Nothing about an ahistorical scenario is supposed to be historical, so there is no "behind historical".

Just thought I would point that out. [;)]
Image

I have no objections to lots of responses to my post . . . but WHERE did you get that emoji?
[/quote]
Cant remember, I found it years ago somewhere and saved it.

Image
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
I have no objections to lots of responses to my post . . . but WHERE did you get that emoji?

Who else is old enough to remember when they were called applets?
The Moose
pws1225
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Tate's Hell, Florida

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by pws1225 »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
I have no objections to lots of responses to my post . . . but WHERE did you get that emoji?

Who else is old enough to remember when they were called applets?

I easily achieve that goal, and am old enough to have grown up using a rotary phone, programmed used IBM punch cards, and know how to tune a set of rabbit ear antennas using tin foil.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I personally don't think John could have attacked somewhere else and scored as many permanent VP as he did in fighting at Sabang.

Perth is a place where you can sometimes destroy quite a few land combat units. Burma and southern India is another.



The Allies do not need all of the LCU that they have at their disposal anyways. Sumatra was a big loss but the Japanese player need do one thing and one thing only to insure a chance at victory. That is he must kill some Allied carriers while he can. Otherwise the Allies are in prime shape come 1/44. It does not matter if you have 40 divisions or 140. Once command of the sea is given over they are of much less value. For this reason, I think targeting a large kill of LCU should be secondary to the primary purpose of killing American carriers. If the Allies don't lose their carriers in 42-43 then they have come out smelling like a rose in my opinion. I can compensate for the loss of six divisions but not for the loss of six carriers. My two cents from the Allied side.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I personally don't think John could have attacked somewhere else and scored as many permanent VP as he did in fighting at Sabang.

Perth is a place where you can sometimes destroy quite a few land combat units. Burma and southern India is another.



The Allies do not need all of the LCU that they have at their disposal anyways. Sumatra was a big loss but the Japanese player need do one thing and one thing only to insure a chance at victory. That is he must kill some Allied carriers while he can. Otherwise the Allies are in prime shape come 1/44. It does not matter if you have 40 divisions or 140. Once command of the sea is given over they are of much less value. For this reason, I think targeting a large kill of LCU should be secondary to the primary purpose of killing American carriers. If the Allies don't lose their carriers in 42-43 then they have come out smelling like a rose in my opinion. I can compensate for the loss of six divisions but not for the loss of six carriers. My two cents from the Allied side.

I will politely disagree. It is about vp. Unfortunately, most JFBs don't know how to fight the deathstar & get crushed.. Including me, but I think that is changing.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: July 27, 1943

Post by John 3rd »

The only way to find out is to CRUSH THE ENEMY!

Dan and I got in FIVE turns today. Just sent the orders turn for AUGUST 1, 1943. Nothing much to report. He has moved some shipping back into the Marshalls and I have two small TF of DDs moving in for some action.

My PH SS might have gotten a sniff of a northward movement. We'll see if the warships encounter my picket line of AKs.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Knife Fighting

Post by John 3rd »

August 1, 1943

The month begins on a hopeful note as the Japanese knife fighters prove that they can still play with the best and most modern the Americans have to offer. Two groups of DDs make successful attacks in the Marshalls. Better yet, NONE are sunk or even seriously damaged.

Mili 4 DD vs a convoy guarded by USS Ward. Two AK sunk and Ward smacked. ALL four of my stupid DDs expel their TTs at the Ward.

Jaliut 5 DDs vs 5 US DDs. The Long Lances fly immediately and sink USS Strong while damaging another.

All nine DDs to concentrate at Kusaie and await Shimakaze when they'll take another stab at shipping.



Image
Attachments
Aug1st.jpg
Aug1st.jpg (332.66 KiB) Viewed 234 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Knife Fighting

Post by John 3rd »

August 3, 1943

The waters begin to turn decidedly HOSTILE in the Marshalls and Gilberts. IJN Musashi and Nagato with a large coterie of CLs and DDs enter the western Marshalls. The BB's are loaded for bombardment and plan to strike Mili. This is the apparent main base of the Allies loaded with fighters and shipping.

To the North--Kido Butai--sorties from Marcus and slowly (cruise speed) moves SE towards the theatre of operations.

To the South, the 8 CVEs of Japan finish refuelling at Rabaul and move towards Tulagi.

The Kaigun is about to make its presence felt...


At Singapore 3 Kongo-Class Battlecruisers finish their upgrades. The fourth--Kirishima--will be done in two days. These veteran monsters shall set course for the Aleutians...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Knife Fighting

Post by Lowpe »

Has he spotted anything moving in to harms way?

User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

August 6, 1943

Post by John 3rd »

August 6, 1943

The big BAD bruisers move into enemy waters and decide to NOT make their bombardment run. Instead the Task Force decides to cruise in circles directly south of Jaliut. Why do they do this? I don't know. Perhaps it is an unscheduled test of the 3.9" AA Batteries. Makes no sense but this is what the game elects to do.

Dawn:

An escort of 18 Zeros fly overhead and everyone knows it will not be enough. The American raids begin with a Squadron of Avengers coming in. I panic fearing Torps but no. They carry bombs. Three more raids come in bringing a total of 36 DB of varying types. Musashi takes 6 500/1,000lb bombs and Nagato gets 5.

Afternoon:

Storms close in around the TF but the raids occur once more. This time Nagato gets smacked by 6 bombs and Musashi an amazing 12 more. YIKES!

Thankfully nothing else is hit.

The point of the obvious bombardment was to force the vulnerable Allied shipping away from their CAP. The plan works here. Raids by Japanese Betty and Jills account for a DE and 3 nice new AK. A Japanese I-Boat adds another AK to the total.

With a sense of great trepidation, I open the turn to look at Musashi and Nagato and am pleasantly happy (all things being equal) with the totals:

Nagato has 25 Sys, 18(6) Flot, and 24 Engine. Only the (6) Flot is major damage.
Musashi suffers 32 Sys, 18(6) Flot, and 20(8) Engine.

Looks like we need a bunch of brooms and a CRAPLOAD of Battleship Grey paint! While depressing damage for no result, it isn't bad. They shall retire to Truk and sit out for a month licking their wounds. The Admiral Commanding the TF has been sacked for absolute STUPIDITY!


Meanwhile...
Kido Butai moves slowly east near Wake. They are undetected...
The CVEs are near Tabitueau and also undetected...

Just out for a stroll. Don't mind the Flattops. Just sweet and innocent flightdecks. REALLY!


Image
Attachments
Aug6.jpg
Aug6.jpg (281.85 KiB) Viewed 234 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

August 6, 1943

Post by John 3rd »

Here was my note to Dan this morning:

Further clarification on that Broom and Paint Order:
1. The brooms need to be the big whisk broom variety. We have a BUNCH of shell casings and shards laying around the decks and tower. Very dangerous for the crew to step on or trip over.
2. As to the paint, we think the US Navy paint is a little too blue. Please make sure it is more grey then blue. Much appreciated there.

The order has been put together and sent by Adm Kono’s Chief-of-Staff because the Admiral has been in seclusion considering committing Seppuku due to STUPIDLY deciding to circle his TF just south of Jaliut and do a ‘field test’ of our newly installed 3.9” AA guns. Quite gracious of him to do that just for your planes to get some operational testing of their own. Our bet is on him not surviving the night!

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”