LST vs. IdahoNYer (DBB-C, A AAR) 6 yrs and done! VJ Day!

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: 27-28 Dec 42

Post by Capt. Harlock »

BBs are the IJN's "secret weapon" in 1942 in our game. I have not developed an effective counter. They soak up bombs in TFs, negating the best Allied air platform - the SBD. Their crews are top notch, so sending US BBs to counter is NOT a good idea - one that I found out the hard way in the Aleutians. US CA TFs, if they can get in close can damage the behemoths if they get lucky, and a DD from the screen scores a miraculous hit.

And the BBs are all too bloody effective in bombardments if not intercepted - they can shut down a level 4 fort protected airbase. So, they have to be intercepted with SOMETHING! I'm still looking for a solution....

How many minelaying subs do you have?
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

RE: 27-28 Dec 42

Post by IdahoNYer »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Luck, schmuck! You can stack the odds a bit more in your favour by training the subs/ships crews and pilots as high as possible before committing them and getting them some combat experience in low risk environments. Easy to say, but the hard part is resisting the urge to push them forward early. I often have to tell myself it really doesn't matter in the long run if I let the IJN take one more insignificant base so that I can keep my pilots training.

My subs get experience early on launching unsuccessful attacks (misses and duds) and suffering ineffective depth charging afterwards. Not exciting but necessary action.
My torpedo bombers get combat experience dropping bombs on easy land targets or poorly CAP'd merchants.
Surface ships get experience doing bombardments and escorting where they have to defend against sub and aircraft attacks.

And PT boats do their thing at night, but then I take the best of them into a separate TF and send it back to the pools to be used later when they are facing BBs rather than just DDs. The trick is to have enough of them with decent experience because the most aggressive will get shot up first and the rest better be able to get the hits.

And of course investing the points in good leaders for the ships/subs/squadrons is essential. I put this ahead of buying out a lot of LCUs early which will be risked in hazardous transport to exposed bases where they may or may not get enough support to survive. IOW, command of the sea and air comes first.

Agree with ever tip you have here BB, and have been doing em - but you forgot one thing - my crafty PBEM opponent is doing the same thing, hence the luck aspect. The IJN has a significant advantage in surface naval combat in '42 - as it should be IMO. Gradually, the USN will gain experience, leadership and crews will improve - but the IJN will remain very, very good. What isn't modeled in WiTPAE are some of the technological edges the USN received as the war progress - radar directed gunnery comes to mind.

Will keep plugging away, and hope I catch a break with the dice gods. My advantage is I can afford a few banged up ships at this point - the IJN can't.
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

RE: 27-28 Dec 42

Post by IdahoNYer »

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
BBs are the IJN's "secret weapon" in 1942 in our game. I have not developed an effective counter. They soak up bombs in TFs, negating the best Allied air platform - the SBD. Their crews are top notch, so sending US BBs to counter is NOT a good idea - one that I found out the hard way in the Aleutians. US CA TFs, if they can get in close can damage the behemoths if they get lucky, and a DD from the screen scores a miraculous hit.

And the BBs are all too bloody effective in bombardments if not intercepted - they can shut down a level 4 fort protected airbase. So, they have to be intercepted with SOMETHING! I'm still looking for a solution....

How many minelaying subs do you have?

I've got the Argonaut, O-20 and am using the two Brit "T" class subs occasionally. With the 12/42 refit, will have a few US subs able to use the Mk12 mine. Shortage of mines is the usual problem.

I mined the heck out of Merauke figuring he'd use the BBs there - of course he sent them to Kirakira instead....go figure...
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: 27-28 Dec 42

Post by BBfanboy »

Apparently the radar directed gunfire is supposed to kick in around October-November 1943. That is roughly the time of the RL Battle of Empress Augusta Bay when four Cleveland Cruisers handled two IJN CAs and a CL, getting a first salvo hit with radar fire control on a very black night.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: 27-28 Dec 42

Post by Capt. Harlock »

the RL Battle of Empress Augusta Bay when four Cleveland Cruisers handled two IJN CAs and a CL,

You're referring to the after-action numbers; the IJN had two CL's going in. [;)]
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

RE: 27-28 Dec 42

Post by IdahoNYer »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Apparently the radar directed gunfire is supposed to kick in around October-November 1943. That is roughly the time of the RL Battle of Empress Augusta Bay when four Cleveland Cruisers handled two IJN CAs and a CL, getting a first salvo hit with radar fire control on a very black night.

Unfortunately, WiTP-AE does not reflect fire control radar. Radar only effects detection.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: 27-28 Dec 42

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Apparently the radar directed gunfire is supposed to kick in around October-November 1943. That is roughly the time of the RL Battle of Empress Augusta Bay when four Cleveland Cruisers handled two IJN CAs and a CL, getting a first salvo hit with radar fire control on a very black night.

Unfortunately, WiTP-AE does not reflect fire control radar. Radar only effects detection.
No fire control effect in the radar stats, but according to a recent post by one of the developers or Alfred, it is under the hood and takes effect in late 1943. I am unsure if it is tied to an upgrade or just "happens", like all the US torpedoes getting better on a given date, whether the ship/sub is in port or not.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

RE: 27-28 Dec 42

Post by IdahoNYer »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Apparently the radar directed gunfire is supposed to kick in around October-November 1943. That is roughly the time of the RL Battle of Empress Augusta Bay when four Cleveland Cruisers handled two IJN CAs and a CL, getting a first salvo hit with radar fire control on a very black night.

Unfortunately, WiTP-AE does not reflect fire control radar. Radar only effects detection.
No fire control effect in the radar stats, but according to a recent post by one of the developers or Alfred, it is under the hood and takes effect in late 1943. I am unsure if it is tied to an upgrade or just "happens", like all the US torpedoes getting better on a given date, whether the ship/sub is in port or not.

BB - the only thread I can reference is this one from 2015 where Symon says there is a "bump" to late war Allied gunnery - but its primarily AAA, not Naval and that radar is only for increased DL.
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3819133&mpage=1&key=fire%2Ccontrol%2Cradar&#3819252

Is this the one you're referring to?

As far as I can find, Radar is only good for increasing DL. And like the thread discusses, the advantages in naval combat gradually swing to the Allies favor due to increasing experience in crew quality. I'm good with that!
User avatar
1EyedJacks
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:26 am
Location: Reno, NV

RE: 27-28 Dec 42

Post by 1EyedJacks »


The greater the DL the easier it is to inflict damage on the enemy in combat. Often even
when the DL is zero, friendly forces will take action due to an MDL value that is higher (i.e.
even though an enemy TF disappears at night, expectations of enemy movements based
on following the enemy closely the previous day can lead to friendly forces anticipating the
enemy’s next move). The DL of every unit changes constantly during the resolution phase
based on the unit’s activities and enemy actions.

10.3 RADAR DETECTION LEVELS AND SURFACE COMBAT
When TFs enter into Surface Combat, each ship is given an individual DL for purposes of the
combat resolution only. Each ship with radar will attempt to use its radar to increase the DL
of enemy ships involved in the combat by checking its radar against each enemy ship. Each
successful radar check will increase the DL of an enemy ship by one.
Ships that are on fire will
have high DL values at night. (The most dangerous place to be is on a burning ship during a
night surface engagement.) The higher a ship’s DL during surface combat, the more likely it is
to become the target of an enemy ship’s weapons.
TTFN,

Mike
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: 27-28 Dec 42

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer




Unfortunately, WiTP-AE does not reflect fire control radar. Radar only effects detection.
No fire control effect in the radar stats, but according to a recent post by one of the developers or Alfred, it is under the hood and takes effect in late 1943. I am unsure if it is tied to an upgrade or just "happens", like all the US torpedoes getting better on a given date, whether the ship/sub is in port or not.

BB - the only thread I can reference is this one from 2015 where Symon says there is a "bump" to late war Allied gunnery - but its primarily AAA, not Naval and that radar is only for increased DL.
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3819133&mpage=1&key=fire%2Ccontrol%2Cradar?

Is this the one you're referring to?

As far as I can find, Radar is only good for increasing DL. And like the thread discusses, the advantages in naval combat gradually swing to the Allies favor due to increasing experience in crew quality. I'm good with that!
I saw something much more recently, but it was probably referring to that discussion.
BTW, the thread you reference doesn't say there is no bump to naval gunnery, it says AAA is bumped more than naval gunnery. The exact quote from the thread:

There is a gunnery accuracy bonus for late war Allied ships : AAA more so than Nav. It has nothing whatsoever to do with any "Radar" Devices. It is hard coded in terms of "time" and is used to "simulate" the effects of gun directors, VT fuses, and the like.

So the hard coded part is what I meant by "under the hood", and the quote confirms it is triggered by a date rather than an upgrade taking place.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

DEc 42 Summary

Post by IdahoNYer »

Dec 42 Summary

December was a busy month, with the Allies making a number of small offensive actions – the long road to Tokyo is moving (or crawling) forward. L_S_T surprised me with his main naval effort clearly at limiting Kirakira’s expansion, but did not oppose Merauke, Baker or Vaitaipu landings with anything but subs and half hearted air attacks – I expected Merauke to be much, much tougher. Nothing decisive was achieved at sea, despite opportunities for both sides. Kirakira has proved to be an attritional fight for both sides, which wasn’t expected. Still, so far, the base is expanding, albeit slowly, and the actions have favored the Allies overall. Keeping the US fleet intact is still a major consideration for Allied plans, not readty to be chasing down the KB yet. These offensive moves have shown me just how brittle the Allied offensive combat power is at this point in the war. Also still a bit surprised, but this has been building, is the sheer number of ground units committed to Burma. Still good with that, but we’re not going on any major offensives there for a long, long time. China continues to deteriorate, and each month China’s still fighting is the only positive I can draw. Naval losses for the month were fairly light for both sides, with only one major naval engagement; IJN reported losses for the month were 1CA, 1CL, 4DD, 7SS and 6SSX as compared to the Allies losing a CL, DD, 3SS and 18PT (PT losses painful, mainly around Kirakira). In the air, it was a very good month for the Allied Cause, 741 for Jpn to 463 Allied.

Screenshot shows Allied Forces disposition - Notes: 1)Ships are in service, not under refit or stood down. 2) a/c shown are combat available, not trainers or deployed on CVs. (also, during this particular timeframe, a few US CV airgroups are deployed ashore (CV Yorktown in yard repairs for instance) HB are 4 engine bombers. 3) CENPAC subs are those against IJN shipping, other Theater subs shown are “in close” for defense of that Theater. 4) En are Construction or Combat Engineers, all others (Port, Base, Group are under BF, including static bases). 4) AR includes armor, TD or recce units of any size.
Image

INTEL: I find the best part of a PBEM is that your opponent may well surprise you. Well, L_S_T has not disappointed! With his focus on Kirakira, he HAS kept me off balance. I figure the KB will be kept in a central position around Rabaul to counter advances up the Solomons, or perhaps Kendari to react to the Allied approach to Darwin. Have been surprised that the KB hasn’t “raided” – while risky, it could be very profitable. Will continue with the goal of striking where the KB isn’t.

SUBWAR: Sub war continues to be frustrating and not very productive. Many subs have, and will continue to, be sent to refit, but now at least some are returning to the shipping lanes. ASW a/c continue to be the biggest threat, and what convoys that are engaged are well protected – another big difference from the AI opponent. Will continue to send subs into Harm’s Way, and hope for the best.

West Coast/USA/Rear Areas: Airframes remain in short supply – I’m still one good CAP TRAP away from a disaster. US Army and USMC pilot pools are actually showing some serious improvement; pilot skill is getting very good, and reserve pool becoming plentiful. US Navy pools remain low, but using a couple of the V-R squadrons should help this in the coming months. Aus, Brit, and NZ pools remain low in fighter pilots, but that will gradually get better. Convoy routes to Aus and India are very robust now, with enough supply and fuel being pushed forward to increase stockage across the board, although still a bit shy of good escorts – although fast US AMs are filling the gap. The biggest challenge in the “rear areas” is trying to determine where the vast amount of engineer reinforcements need to be headed – anticipating requirements, and sending them out on transports from the West Coast. I can live with those kind of problems!

NOPAC. Occupying Buldir Island has, and will remain the focus to set the conditions to land on Attu in the spring. Should be able to base SBDs on Buldir this month to interdict any shipping going into Attu. Don’t expect anything major happening in Theater for a while.

CENPAC. Baker Is was seized without a fight. Will continue to build up for landings in the Gilberts – but this is a big jump, and would like to know where the KB is before I launch. That said, should be ready to launch an amphib, at least by forward staging ground troops, before the end of Jan.

SOPAC. Kirakira will remain the focus. Goal is still to build up the AF to interdict (and later support) operations in Lunga/Tulagi vicinity. Figure that will take the rest of January, and it will likely involve both sea and airpower. Keeping the pressure up here should keep the major IJN occupied, and out of the way for continued thrusts in SWPAC. Will begin to stage troops for Lunga/Tulagi – but the trigger for that is not only Kira being fully operational, but the KBs location confirmed.

SWPAC. Merauke was much easier than anticipated, both the landing and the current buildup. Merauke should be able to base a/c to interdict bases on Northern New Guinea shortly. Focus will be to drive towards the prize – Darwin.

WAUS. Ground movement has started from Exmouth to Port Hedland, and its being effectively supplied over the beach by a few xAKLs. Will continue that process, more troops and more ships to support with the goal of seizing Port Hedland. Will gradually increase both naval and air support as the ground pounders get closer to the target.

Burma/India. Think we have achieved stalemate here. Both sides have committed a large number of both air and ground forces. L_S_T is focused on holding Magwe, and that’s not surprising. While still short airframes, Allied offensive options are limited. I’m good with waging a war of attrition, and will continue that focus for the next couple of months.

China. Well, IJA troops have reached Chungking, and the situation is dire. Supply is non-existent, and it’s only going to get worse. Goal is to hold out as long as possible, and use US fighter squadrons occasionally to provide CAP Traps when feasible.
Attachments
421231.jpg
421231.jpg (232.5 KiB) Viewed 262 times
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

31 Dec 42 - 1 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

31 Dec 42 - 1 Jan 43

Highlights – Lily shoot down over Chungking. AND best of all…..it’s 1943!!!!!

Jpn ships sunk:
DMS: 1 (old)
PB: 1

Jpn ships un-sunk:
SS: 1 (I-32)

Allied ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Porter – scuttled at Kirakira)
PT: 1 (by mines off Exmouth)

Air loss:
Jpn: 57
Allied: 09

Subwar:
Jpn: 1 Attacks, 0 ships hit
Allies: 3 Attacks, 1 ship hit (PB sunk)

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated:
Agattu Island (NOPAC)

SIGINT/Intel: NSTR

West Coast/Admin, NSTR.

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, NSTR.

In SOPAC, quiet at Kirakira for a welcome change. Only sub activity and ineffective night time Betty bombing. US DDs at Kira make it back to Ndeni. PTs remain at Ndeni, and all damage to the AF and port has been repaired.

In SWPAC, three LB-30s hit Rabaul port again at night, putting a bomb on an AKE leaving her on fire. Bettys hit Merauke at night, and aren’t intercepted – and manage to destroy a pair of Aussie Kittyhawks on the ground. Shipping continues to move troops and cargo along the Australian coast without interference.

In WAUS, mines from I-22 find and sink a PT off Exmouth.

In China, the US P-40 squadron at Chungking flies CAP along with two Chinese squadrons out of Kweiyang, and despite weather aborting all strikes on the first day, score 40 Lilys shot down for zero loss. A good day’s work! Will move the P-40s out of Chungking to Changsa as I’m sure L_S_T will send scores of Oscars to sweep next turn.

In India/Burma, B-24s hit troops moving north of Shwebo, destroying about 20 guns from an FA unit – no CAP. Despite no CAP north of Shwebo, recon planes report over 320 fighters based at Magwe! Not planning on a raid there any time soon.
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

A short review

Post by IdahoNYer »

Over a year done (and took almost two years to do it!!) While waiting for a turn, a short review….

Overall, things don’t seem to look to bad at all. The initiative is firmly in Allied hands – and that was by choice – L_S_T went over to the strategic defensive a couple of months ago – not by a dramatic victory. That was probably IMO a good call on his part, to preserve the force in a defensive role, striking out in counter blows. Will see.

Image
Attachments
430101a.jpg
430101a.jpg (137.23 KiB) Viewed 262 times
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

Naval

Post by IdahoNYer »

On the naval side, the big news is both sides have managed to preserve their carrier fleet. I’ve lost all too many BBs, but the IJN has taken some heavy loss in cruisers and destroyers. Overall, we’ve both been fairly conservative in the first year, and I’m pretty well satisfied with the results so far. Just wish the subs would be more effective (and IJN ASW less so!).


Image
Attachments
430101b.jpg
430101b.jpg (85.56 KiB) Viewed 262 times
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

Air

Post by IdahoNYer »

In the air, its gone better than expected. The initial drubbing to the Zero didn’t last as long as I thought it would, and I’ve been pleasantly surprised with the performance of the P-39. Aircraft shortages have been the main problem, pilot pools seem fairly good at this point. It will only get better in 1943 (I think).

Image
Attachments
43-01-01c.jpg
43-01-01c.jpg (456.58 KiB) Viewed 262 times
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Naval

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer

On the naval side, the big news is both sides have managed to preserve their carrier fleet. I’ve lost all too many BBs, but the IJN has taken some heavy loss in cruisers and destroyers. Overall, we’ve both been fairly conservative in the first year, and I’m pretty well satisfied with the results so far. Just wish the subs would be more effective (and IJN ASW less so!).


Image
I don't understand the last two columns of the report. Are they for the Japanese player or Allied? Is the "total" of 34 CVs the total in the whole game?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

RE: Naval

Post by IdahoNYer »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


I don't understand the last two columns of the report. Are they for the Japanese player or Allied? Is the "total" of 34 CVs the total in the whole game?

Its the total number that were available for the Allied player; active, sunk and that will come in as reinforcements.
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

2-3 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

2-3 Jan 43

Highlights – Effective night bombing of Magwe with expanded (2 squadrons allowed) night bombing house rule.

Jpn ships sunk:
SS: 2 (I-124, RO-100)

Jpn ships un-sunk:
SS: 1 (RO-62)

Allied ships sunk: None

Air loss:
Jpn: 54
Allied: 15

Subwar:
Jpn: 1 Attacks, 0 ships hit
Allies: 1 Attacks, 1 ship hit (PB dam)

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated:
Shemya Island (NOPAC)

SIGINT/Intel:PBYs sight 10 (unknown type) ships west of Rennel Island, and a pair of Mabels and Vals are reported as Ops losses – I’m assuming this to be a CV force heading to raid shipping near Kirakira.

West Coast/Admin, NSTR.

In NOPAC, more engineers arrive at Buldir Island and its port reaches level 1.

In CENPAC, NSTR.

In SOPAC, Bettys hit Kirakira at night with no effect. US Heavies hit Tulagi with moderate effect – no CAP. US fleet departs SUVA – CV TFs head toward the Coral Sea, south of Noumea and a CA TF heads to Ndeni. Sighting of what may be a CV TF near Rennel Island is interesting – will see what develops. Not looking for a fight with the KB!

In SWPAC, Bettys hit Merauke at night, destroying a single F4F. Allied shipping remains unmolested, bringing in more supplies and engineers. Allied focus now shifting from Merauke to setting conditions at Groote Eylandt, Gove and Wessel Islands.

In WAUS, mines cleared from Exmouth. B-17s hit Broome AF at night with minimal effect, destroying an Oscar IIb and a Nick.

In China, the US P-40 squadron now at Changsa provides LRCAP over a Chinese Corps near Nanchang and as hoped, catches a robust Tojo IIb squadron in a ground attack role – 6 Tojos are lost for 3 P-40s. First time Tojo IIb is encountered – figured this was a pilot training mission on a “soft” target. Will move the P-40s out of Changsa, but keep them in China for a while to hopefully execute another CAP trap. Meanwhile, Chungking was swept by Oscar IIbs, but not bombed. No Allied fighters intercepted the sweeps.

In India/Burma, my favorite night bombers, two Wellington squadrons, hit Magwe at 2000ft. Despite a robust night time CAP of Nicks, the Wellys manage to destroy 10 Oscar IIb, 7 Tonys, 4 Nicks, and 3 Tojos on the ground and do some damage to the AF while losing 2 bombers to Ops loss. Nice. B-24s hit Katha hard with good effect, no CAP met. Looks like L_S_T keeping most of his fighters at Magwe – will keep hitting Magwe at night, and keep the daylight bombing at other bases or ground troops for a while – see if he provides some LRCAP, or is focused on protecting Magwe.
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

4-5 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

4-5 Jan 43

Highlights – Enemy naval and air action near Port Hedland

Jpn ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Murasame -old)
SS: 1 (I-169)

Jpn ships un-sunk:
SS: 1 (RO-67)

Allied ships sunk:
SS: 1 (Halibut – another victim of ASW a/c)
AM: 1
xAKL: 1

Air loss:
Jpn: 23
Allied: 19

Subwar:
Jpn: 1 Attacks, 0 ships hit
Allies: 2 Attacks, 0 ships hit

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated: None

SIGINT/Intel: Whatever was sighted near Rennell Island disappeared.

West Coast/Admin, NSTR.

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, the subwar continues to frustrate. Large tanker convoy sighted off the China coast near Foochow, heading to Japan. First sub to contact, Halibut, is damaged by escort and sunk by ASW a/c. I’ve got more subs in the area, and Grenadier and Herring both take shots at escorts, and can’t penetrate the heavy screen. I’ve got about 6 subs in the vicinity that will try and contact next turn, but this seems more like 1943 in the Atlantic than at any time in the Pacific! Not good!

In SOPAC, Bettys hit Kirakira at night again with no effect, while supplies are landed by transport without any opposition. US CVs continue to loiter WNW of Noumea to see if the IJN reaches out to interdict the supply flow into Kirakira.

In SWPAC, continued ineffective night time Betty strike at Merauke. Shipping and aircraft ready at Normanton – will begin operations against Groote Eylandt next turn.

In WAUS, got a surprise from L_S_T. After weeks of inactivity, a CL TF (CL, 2DD) sortied (presumably out of Broome) to sink the resupply run (AM, xAKL) providing supplies over the beach to lead Allied troops just west of Port Hedland. Additionally, OscarIIbs sweep the skies over the Allied troops, catching me being lazy with the LRCAP missions – I forgot to stand down or rotate the USMC F4F squadron flying the LRCAP, and they lose 8 planes to 1 Oscar – the F4Fs pilot fatigue was over 40 minimum – careless! Anyway, the Oscars pave the way for Sallys hitting the ground troops with good effect – especially reducing supplies. AA Bn is enroute overland, but in the meantime, I need to pay more attention to the LRCAP. I’m also sending a CA TF (2CA, DDs) to bombard Broome – keeping my fingers crossed for that one!

In China, NSTR.

In India/Burma, it was pretty quiet. Allied night bombing not effective as I rest the Wellys.


User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

6-7 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

6-7 Jan 43

Highlights – Small IJN Naval victory off Broome; airborne assault takes Groote Eylandt

Jpn ships sunk:
SS: 1 (RO-67)
xAK: 1

Jpn ships un-sunk:
SS: 1 (RO-64)

Allied ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Jarvis)

Air loss:
Jpn: 41
Allied: 35

Subwar:
Jpn: 1 Attacks, 0 ships hit
Allies: 4 Attacks, 2 ship hit (xAK sunk, xAKL dam)

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv/Airborne Aslt:
Groote Eylandt

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated:
Groote Eylandt (SWPAC)

SIGINT/Intel: NSTR

West Coast/Admin, NSTR.

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, NSTR.

In SOPAC, quiet seems to have returned to Kirakira, other than the ineffective nightly Betty raids. xAKLs continue to shuttle in supplies, and some additional engineers begin loading up at Ndeni for a run in. Supplies are finally out of the red, and if left unmolested, the AF should reach level 2 in a few days – that will allow SBD coverage beyond Tulagi/Lunga. Nice. Also nice is that it’s ’43 and we’ll try the first attempt at aerial minelaying in the Solomons next turn.

In SWPAC, 503rd Para Reg takes Groote Eylandt in the first assault, against about a 1/3 of the Sasebo SNLF – rest of the unit likely at future targets of Gove and Wessel Is. The first engineer battalion is already enroute, about 4 hexes out, hopefully covered well enough by P-38s on LRCAP. More engineers and AA are loading at Normanton – the challenge here will be to provide sufficient LRCAP until the AF is developed. Depending on L_S_T’s response, will look at landing sooner rather than later at Wessel and/or Gove.

In WAUS, the CA TF (2CA, 6DD) to bombard Broome is intercepted just off Broome by a CL TF (CL, 2DD) presumably heading back west to intercept the xAKL bringing supplies across the beach to Allied troops west of Port Hedland. As for the naval action, despite good leaders, reasonable crews and a decidedly numeric advantage, the IJN TF bested the Allied TF in both a night time and daylight skirmish – sinking one DD, and banging up two more which will require yard time. IJN losses – a DD perhaps heavily damaged. Not good. Figured in daylight the CA’s guns would bear some fruit….not so much. Needless to say, the bombardment didn’t happen and the CA TF is currently limping back to Carnavon.

In China, NSTR.

In India/Burma, I sent the US bombers to support ground troops in the jungles NE of Akyab – figuring a milk run, I only had about 60 or so fighters in support as LRCAP…..well…..L_S_T had his LRCAP out in force, and weather apparently grounded over half my CAP – I got lucky, what fighters that did fly, didn’t do bad. Even so, LRCAP totaled some 65 OscarIIb, 25 Tojo, and 28 Tonys, against a LRCAP of about 30 mixed fighters (P40K, Spits, and Hurris). By the end of the two days, 23 Jpn fighters lost in exchange for 15 Allied fighters, 8 B-25s and 2 B-24s. It could have been much, much worse. Bombers will return next turn, this time with a much reinforced LRCAP and sweeps. Goal here is to soften up and disrupt the IJA’s 4th ID in support of a two division ground attack in the next few days.



Image
Attachments
430106.jpg
430106.jpg (297.28 KiB) Viewed 262 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”