Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

cfinch
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 8:53 pm

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by cfinch »

fwiw - i thought only bad roll was DX (or AX) in which case you just let other player choose effectively 'fixing' the roll.
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Japanese are doing several ground strikes. The Chinese fighter can fly over it's own hex, assuming it did not fly CAP (email question - assumption being no, if it did, then myhttp://www.matrixgames.com/forums/post.asp?do= ... toStyle=tm# ground strike flights may change). Do you want it to fly defending Chiang?

Image
Attachments
ChineseFi..Reaction.jpg
ChineseFi..Reaction.jpg (736.89 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30267
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Yes to Chinese fighter flying to defend Chaing against Ground Strikes. Rebase Chinese fighter in hex, China[87, 136].

Also, the Poles choose assault on all land combats this impulse. Any results calling for less losses than units attacked chose the least important ones first to destroy.
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Getting a bit done before my guest awake this morning.

Chinese AA combat.

Image
Attachments
ChinaAAcombat..jpg
ChinaAAcombat..jpg (281.73 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Lodz Ground Strike

Image
Attachments
LodzGS.jpg
LodzGS.jpg (394.14 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Warsaw Ground Strike

Image
Attachments
WarsawGS.jpg
WarsawGS.jpg (385.17 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30267
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Getting a bit done before my guest awake this morning.
Looks like no rebasing necessary for the Chinese fighter. [:(]
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Where would you like surviving Polish naval units to flee?
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30267
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Where would you like surviving Polish naval units to flee?
Scapa flow.
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Polish CA escapes to Scapa Flow, however the convoy was sunk on way out of port.
German Attack on Krakow was a full success. And is to be followed up by two other attacks.

Image
Attachments
GEKrakowattack.jpg
GEKrakowattack.jpg (323.34 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Poznan is another success.

Image
Attachments
GEPoznanattack.jpg
GEPoznanattack.jpg (308.16 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

And the hat trick was completed north of Warsaw.

Image
Attachments
GENortho..wattack.jpg
GENortho..wattack.jpg (300.26 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Below is not an issue at the moment. Is their an explanation on why the reorg cost for the Harbin Terr is 4? Japanese took a combined, so I was expecting to see it cost 2.

Image
Attachments
HQreorg.jpg
HQreorg.jpg (267.21 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Pat
User avatar
Mayhemizer_slith
Posts: 9376
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:44 am
Location: Finland

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by Mayhemizer_slith »

Did you choose land action, combined or naval?
If your attack is going really well, it's an ambush.

-Murphy's war law
User avatar
Courtenay
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:34 pm

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by Courtenay »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Below is not an issue at the moment. Is their an explanation on why the reorg cost for the Harbin Terr is 4? Japanese took a combined, so I was expecting to see it cost 2.

The Harbin TERR is not a Japanese unit, it is a Manchurian unit. For a Japanese HQ to reorganize it costs double. As the Japanese took a combined, this is doubled a second time to four.
I thought I knew how to play this game....
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30267
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2.

France & CW take navals. China takes a land. USSR & USA take combines.

The CW decides to use 2 of their 3 air missions for (surprise) port strikes. The first one is against Keil.

Keil (surprise) Port Strike.

I made the "minor" decision for you NOT to commit your subs at Keil. I hope this is ok and I hope we can make minor decisions such as these for the non-phasing player in order to speed up play.

Back to the Kiel port strike. The RAF bombers got through and did surprise the KM. However, their bombs were much less effective than I had hoped.

Image
Attachments
01Surpris..onKeil.jpg
01Surpris..onKeil.jpg (799.99 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30267
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. Rostock (surprise) Port Strike.

Again, RAF bombers get through and surprise the KM at Rostock. And again, the bombers are less effective than hoped.

Image
Attachments
01Surpris..Rostock.jpg
01Surpris..Rostock.jpg (668.88 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30267
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

QUESTION: Does the Luftwaffe wish to intercept the Polish bomber flying a ground strike mission on the units in Krawkow, Poland? The Polish fighter is flying escort.

Image
Attachments
02QuestionsKrawkow.jpg
02QuestionsKrawkow.jpg (747.63 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Fine with the minor decisions (or really obvious). Yes intercept the Polish bomber.

I'm ok with 2.2.5 I really don't expect the loss issues with invasions or paradrops to raise it's head early in this game.
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30267
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. Polish Ground Strike.

I'm sorry, but a great result for the Poles.

Image
Attachments
02PolGSTK.jpg
02PolGSTK.jpg (654.05 KiB) Viewed 395 times
Ronnie
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”