ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist
warspite1
I may be wrong as this is just my perception, but the number of regulars - and certainly those that are willing to post - seems to have reduced over the last few years. But I've noticed that too in the game forums. Look at the WITW and the WITE forums, look at the MWIF forum, same for Wars of Napoleon and Scourge of War Waterloo. Even DC:B - which got such positive feedback when it first came out, seems to have gone very quiet. No one has done an AAR for about 4 months and comment is few and far between.
Maybe I am seeing it wrong but it (the forums) don't appear to be as healthy as once was....
Your sentence is a bid ambiguous here but: WITW seems quit, agree with it. I don't care that much because i am mostly interested in the eastern front. WITE forum is very active, both in AARs, game questions and WITE 2/general discussion. WIF has a good number of AARs running. And there still is WITP AE, this is a very special thing...
It is of course sad that DC: Operation Barbarossa is so quiet, some AARs would be great
warspite1
Yes, of those I mentioned, WITE is the most active. I guess its about our own ideas of what is a "good number". You say there is a good number of AAR's running for MWIF. There are, I think, 5 going at present. For such a big game I don't think 5 is exactly great - and the usual discussion you would expect on game tips and the like just isn't there. You didn't mention SOW or WON so I assume you agree on those? DC:B is the biggest surprise for me though. Maybe almost all forums go that way eventually? Maybe I am judging by WITP-AE (which appears to be a unique case) and shouldn't be.
Yes, looks like we have different ideas of "active" and "good number".
I agree with SOW and WON but i hardly care about this so I only take note of this when scrolling down to my subforums of interest.
Its sad that DC:B is so quiet. This game can produce some very interesting AARs.
Finally, most things are subjective, we would need some statistics (which do not include spam [:D]) to prove one side wrong.
WITP AE is a special phenomenon, nothing for me but it is great that it has such a good long term community (like, to lesser extent, WITE).
About history/military history topics in a wargaming forum: I tried to create such a discussion here, maybe you remember the US Army vs. Wehrmacht efficiency comparison . Thread was closed soon, I still believe it was completely unjustified but Admins have more experience how discussions can develop then me. But it is hard to discuss history because it is so closely connected with "economy, politics and history" which is forbidden. I am always interested to discuss 1900-1950 related history, tactics, wars etc. but I won't make another attempt on my own because last time I put a lot of work in the first post to start a discussion about the army organisation thing it was immediately closed and I won't waste time to write a useless article again.