Thoughts

Fury Games has now signed with Matrix Games, and we are working together on the next Strategic Command. Will use the Slitherine PBEM++ server for asynchronous multi-player.

Moderators: MOD_Strategic_Command_3, Fury Software

Post Reply
StrategyGamer
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2015 11:13 pm
Location: United States of America

Thoughts

Post by StrategyGamer »

Never played/seen any Strategic Command game but, this seems interesting
It has a Panzer Corps unit feel and a Commander: The Great War economic and map feel
With an editor too, think I'll get this when this comes out
User avatar
Ostwindflak
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:36 pm
Location: New Hampshire

RE: Thoughts

Post by Ostwindflak »

Good choice. You won't be disappointed.
User avatar
xwormwood
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Bremen, Germany

RE: Thoughts

Post by xwormwood »

Feel free to try the older SC-Games too, they are really good:

Global Conflict with Gold add-on & Great War with Breakthrough add-on.
"You will be dead, so long as you refuse to die" (George MacDonald)
sullafelix
Posts: 1521
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:17 am

RE: Thoughts

Post by sullafelix »

I can second the WWI and Breakthrough nomination.

These games are much deeper than Panzer Corps.
Windows 7 home premium 64
Intel quad core I7
16 gig
AMD R9 200 series

Di! Ecce hora! Uxor mea me necabit!
User avatar
MrsWargamer
Posts: 1653
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 4:04 pm

RE: Thoughts

Post by MrsWargamer »

Always thought SC1 was a great game. Still is.

Looking to see how it has matured into SC3.

I'll be honest, I tend to prefer to think of all the stuff in the middle as like movie sequels no one wants to recall. Just my opinion.
Wargame, 05% of the time.
Play with Barbies 05% of the time.
Play with Legos 10% of the time.
Build models 20% of the time
Shopping 60% of the time.
Exlains why I buy em more than I play em.
User avatar
Skeleton
Posts: 560
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:43 pm

RE: Thoughts

Post by Skeleton »

I have to say, this is much more than PC or CTGW. I really think that SC3 will be the definite grand strategy game for WW2. Great, great stuff.
*Formerly known as Marcus the Leper, time has taken a toll and now I am simply a skeleton...*
battleground
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:23 am

RE: Thoughts

Post by battleground »

Will it have counters vs the tiny soldiers as an option?
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10076
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: Thoughts

Post by sPzAbt653 »

Yes ! And modify-able !!
James Taylor
Posts: 700
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Contact:

RE: Thoughts

Post by James Taylor »


And we know that all the features will be working from the first download.
SeaMonkey
User avatar
lionel1957
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:01 pm

RE: Thoughts

Post by lionel1957 »

All of the SC and SC2 games are really good games. I have all of them. The editor is easy to use for any level of experience. The only issue I have ever encountered with these games is that if I edit unit characteristics (mp, attack, defend, etc.) the game AI would slow down and the turns would take longer. Even with that, I give all of these games an A, with SC2 Pacific an A+.

Looking forward to SC3!
Ted Smith
Rosseau
Posts: 2951
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:20 am

RE: Thoughts

Post by Rosseau »

I have purchased every add-on, module, etc. from SC1 to Assault on Communism (AoC). Grand strategy is not my favorite, except for World in Flames (nothing can compare) and maybe the upgraded Commander at War. A hex representing an Army labeled with a "10" strength, for example, is too simplistic, while an Army's worth of chits from WitE is too much. [;)]

Mike's AAR is very good. But the map and counters look pulled from Time of Wrath. Caveat is they are moddable, and will be modded well by the fan base.

There is also a hint of a better AI. That would be welcomed, although AI hasn't been a big problem for me in the series. However, if it is exceptional, as Ian had hinted, that could create some excitement.

Without question, anyone who has never played SC2 on up, really should consider this game. Being it's on Matrix and may go to Steam one day, you might attract a more sizable audience than before, plus all the diehards. That would be my hope.



User avatar
bairdlander2
Posts: 2320
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:25 am
Location: Toronto Ontario but living in Edmonton,Alberta

RE: Thoughts

Post by bairdlander2 »

ORIGINAL: Marcus the leper

I really think that SC3 will be the definite grand strategy game for WW2.
Are you serious?
colberki
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 4:46 am

RE: Thoughts

Post by colberki »

I have SC1 and SC2 Game mechanics look very similar. Graphics of course much better. So what really is new in this game?
User avatar
Hubert Cater
Posts: 6023
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 11:42 am
Contact:

RE: Thoughts

Post by Hubert Cater »

Hi Colberki,

If you haven't had the chance to read our first blog post it does cover a few of the new features and enhancements that the new game will offer... we should have a few more blogs in the next little while that will cover more details.

http://www.matrixgames.com/SC/Blog_1.asp

Hubert
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII War in Europe”