ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
While reading "The Elephant Vanishes" (Obvert's) AAR yesterday, I noticed that his game is at 1/21/44, two months ahead of my game.
The point totals in the two games are wildly, dramatically different. This game has been much bloodier than his. That is a reflection of the nonstop action between the two sides. Since late spring of '42, neither side has been separated and there have been no lulls. We've constantly been at each other's throats from the Bay of Bengal to Sumatra to the Marshalls, Gilberts, Wake Island and now eastern DEI.
The real question is whether this is an effective way for an Allied player to wage war. I think it is. I think John's naval forces are teetering on collapse. If that's true, the payoff should become obvious in '44 as the Allies move forward from the ongoing DEI campaign.
We'll see.
Fun to look in here and see that your game has restarted. Congrats on your persuasive efforts! [;)]
Also interesting to see this comparison for me. Your game has indeed been bloodier, and the Allies much more aggressive and intent on pushing Japan to the limit. Historiker had some great moments early in his defensive phase, then suffered some setbacks in the transition to offence that slowed the game for extended periods.
Once Joseph took over it's gotten much more interesting again, and I the Allies seem again looking purposeful and steady, leading well-planned ops moving forward.
One item you didn't mention also is that the Japanese base points in your game are quite low. That will really help you as you turn the tide and can begin pushing back there, but really also that he doesn't have a buffer of points to cushion the blows to come. He also will not have had the additional supply/HI points China can provide.
The ship losses in your game are insane!!
One question: you've got some nice PPs waiting there to spend. What are you buying? [:)]






[/center]





