Marine Raiders...and their use

Uncommon Valor: Campaign for the South Pacific covers the campaigns for New Guinea, New Britain, New Ireland and the Solomon chain.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Tankerace, siRkid

Post Reply
User avatar
dwesolick
Posts: 610
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 7:33 am
Location: Colorado

Marine Raiders...and their use

Post by dwesolick »

:confused: I've played UV a number of times and have never been quite able to figure out how to use the Raider bns properly. I've never had the guts to actually try to "raid" a defended Japanese base, as I feel this would simply result in a battle in which the outnumbered Raiders would be crushed.
I've always simply used them as additional infantry or to seize unoccupied spots. Has anyone actually tried to use the Marine Raiders as "raiders?" If so, what was the result?
"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7204
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

Post by Feinder »

You don't really get a bonus because they're "Raider" btns. It conducts the combat, just as it would for any other land unit. So I wouldn't plan on "raiding" Lae with one, while Lae is defended by 4 divisions. They WON'T blow up a bunch of supplies and then get back on their transports (altho that would be a nice). It will resolve the attack normally (and it would die very quickly).

The "advantage" of the Raider Btns (and a few others), is that they carry all of their support with them. They not inherantly deficient in support points, and thus don't need to be stacked with an HQ to be at full effectiveness.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
User avatar
Hartley
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 4:21 pm

Post by Hartley »

'He’s got a weird accent, sort of Australian, sort of German. He checks out Shaftoe’s insignia in turn. "What’s a Marine Raider? Some kind of new outfit?"

Like a Marine, only more so," Shaftoe says. Which might sound like bravado. Indeed it partly is. But this comment is as heavy laden with irony as Shaftoe’s clothes are with sand, because at this particular moment in history, a Marine isn’t just a tough S.O.B. He is a tough S.O.B. stuck out in the middle of nowhere (Guadalcanal) with no food or weapons (owing, as every Marine can tell you, to a sinister conspiracy between General MacArthur and the Nips) totally making everything up as he goes along, improvising weapons from found objects, addled, half the time, by disease and the drugs supplied to keep diseases at bay. And in every one of those senses, a Marine Raider is (as Shaftoe says) like a Marine, only more so.'

- from Cryptonomicon
User avatar
denisonh
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Upstate SC

Post by denisonh »

They pack a good punch for their size (about a 1000 troop load out for a 30 point assault value) and as pointed out, have thier own support.

I have used the raider Bns inserted by Fast Transport, in conjuction with an airborne assault, to quickly take a lightly defended base.

Worked pretty good.
"Life is tough, it's even tougher when you're stupid" -SGT John M. Stryker, USMC
petdoc
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 9:06 pm
Location: Calgary, Canada

cryptonomicon

Post by petdoc »

Hey! Just finished that book. Loved it, not a quick read though. I like his loose and irreverent writing style, very generation xish. I felt he was just a little "too clever" at times though. At times it was hard to tell where the history stopped and the fiction started, especially concerning the codebreakers, very well done. The best though were the multi page dissertations on the proper way to eat captain crunch cereal and the science of masturb*****(had graphs etc). I highly recommend the book to anyone.
User avatar
Luskan
Posts: 1673
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Down Under

Re: cryptonomicon

Post by Luskan »

Originally posted by petdoc
Hey! Just finished that book. Loved it, not a quick read though. I like his loose and irreverent writing style, very generation xish. I felt he was just a little "too clever" at times though. At times it was hard to tell where the history stopped and the fiction started, especially concerning the codebreakers, very well done. The best though were the multi page dissertations on the proper way to eat captain crunch cereal and the science of masturb*****(had graphs etc). I highly recommend the book to anyone.


My favourite book too!
With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?ImageImage
BaggyPantsDevil
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by BaggyPantsDevil »

The Raider Battalions are great for taking undefended bases--why use a whole regiment and the transports to carry them when a battalion will do?--or to airland at a freshly seized airfield to reinforce the paratroops.
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

Raiders

Post by mogami »

Hi (looks around to make sure no Japs are near by)
(In a low voice) What you do, is watch when the Japs are landing on bases. Keep track of the size force they land. When you see one that is small enough for the Raiders to send 2-1 you make 2 Fast Transport TF's. You load the Raiders on to one and send them off. After they kill the Japs you send the second TF to pick them up. (you can not order a FT TF at sea to pick up) (or you can have subs standing by to pick up ) Also if the enemy are in range of C-47 you can use the Para Marines and have a FT pick up.
Never refuse to kill the enemy when and where possible.
(just be carefull your FT do not encounter enemy surface TF)(send a escort surface TF to protect the FT)
Now keep that under your hat.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
estaban
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:20 am

Post by estaban »

The raider battalions are just another useful little unit in the game, they have no special purpose.

It's kind of like all those recon regiments the Japanese divisions come with. They don't really recon, and provide no "intelligence bonus" however, a little extra firepower is nice to have around.
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

Does not understand

Post by mogami »

Originally posted by estaban
The raider battalions are just another useful little unit in the game, they have no special purpose.

It's kind of like all those recon regiments the Japanese divisions come with. They don't really recon, and provide no "intelligence bonus" however, a little extra firepower is nice to have around.


Hi, Place these "recon" rgts in the same hex as "regular" rgt.
Order them to move to the next hex by marching. Check which unit arrives first and the fatigue disruption they have. Then come back and post they are the same.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
estaban
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:20 am

Post by estaban »

Maybe, Mogami. But how often do units, especially Japanese units, march from one place to another? The only place this happens is in selected parts of New Guinea.

Most of the units are placed on an individual island/base, and have nowhere to march to.
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

OK

Post by mogami »

Originally posted by estaban
Maybe, Mogami. But how often do units, especially Japanese units, march from one place to another? The only place this happens is in selected parts of New Guinea.

Most of the units are placed on an individual island/base, and have nowhere to march to.


Hi, OK I'll buy that. But now as Japan when you need a unit that can march you know which one to select.

Really? no one has ever noticed that the tank units move down the roads in Austraila faster then the leg infantry?
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by crsutton »

Originally posted by Feinder


The "advantage" of the Raider Btns (and a few others), is that they carry all of their support with them. They not inherantly deficient in support points, and thus don't need to be stacked with an HQ to be at full effectiveness.

-F- [/B]


Yes, this is the key here. They are self supporting as the SNLF forces and Japanese Naval Garrisons.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: Raiders

Post by crsutton »

Originally posted by Mogami
Hi (looks around to make sure no Japs are near by)
(In a low voice) What you do, is watch when the Japs are landing on bases. Keep track of the size force they land. When you see one that is small enough for the Raiders to send 2-1 you make 2 Fast Transport TF's. You load the Raiders on to one and send them off. After they kill the Japs you send the second TF to pick them up. (you can not order a FT TF at sea to pick up) (or you can have subs standing by to pick up ) Also if the enemy are in range of C-47 you can use the Para Marines and have a FT pick up.
Never refuse to kill the enemy when and where possible.
(just be carefull your FT do not encounter enemy surface TF)(send a escort surface TF to protect the FT)
Now keep that under your hat.


Your secret is in the vault. I won't tell a soul. :-)
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
Snigbert
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Worcester, MA. USA

Post by Snigbert »

They pack a good punch for their size (about a 1000 troop load out for a 30 point assault value) and as pointed out, have thier own support.

That's a good point, if an Army RCT has around 4000 load and 80 assault, then pound for pound Raiders are a lot tougher...they would have 120 Assault if they were RCT sized (4 times bigger).

Plus they have leaders with cool names like 'Red' Mike Edson. I saw a plaque to him at the USS Intrepid Museum, and my friend asked me where he got the nick name. I said "I dont know, maybe he was a red-head". My friend looked disappointed so I told him Edson used to bathe in and drink Japanese blood, so the called him 'Red' Mike. He liked that a lot better, even though I made it up.
"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

Red Mike

Post by mogami »

Hi, It was his beard that gave him his nickname. When the USMC was in Nicaragua in the 1920's.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
Post Reply

Return to “Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific”