Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa
Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #2. (Non-Phasing) IJN. The Marianas, Solomons, East Indian Ocean.

5. Which or these three sea area would the Japanese wish to attempt to initiate combat?

6. (If applicable) How do they wish to allocate the indicated air units to the battle?

7. (If applicable) What are your standing orders for how they wish to fight in each area?
5) Only the Marianas.
6) React the zero out to the 3-box of the Marianas, joining the other aircraft.
7) If I can get 6 surprise points against the 3-box, engage them and use 6 surprise points to adjust your A-A down 2 and mine up 1 column. Any extra SP are used to move my attack on the naval units up one column (after the effects of AA). If in the first round I get less than 6 SP, then target the 0-box only. Naval attacks you target the Carriers (order - Lexington, Saratoga, Yorktown). If a damage can potentially sink a carrier, select it.
The loss/abort of all Japanese CP's in the China Sea has put the Japanese naval base at Truk out of supply. This means that the Japanese aircraft at Truk can no longer fly out and join a potential naval battle in the Marianas.

16. Do you still wish to attempt to initiate a naval combat in the Marianas?


Image
Attachments
02ALIJN..Marianas.jpg
02ALIJN..Marianas.jpg (638.68 KiB) Viewed 227 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa
8. Do the Italians wish to attempt to initiate combat in the East Med?

9. (If applicable) how do they wish to allocate the additional air units that could join the battle?

10. (If applicable) What are the standing orders for how the Italians wish to fight?

POTENTIAL BUG: I just noticed that the game didn't give the Italians the chance as the non-phasing player to initiate a naval combat in the North Atlantic. I know the CW added a NAV to the 3-box and, I pretty such the RN/USN added more SCS to the sea area. The Italians do have on organized sub so this may be a bug. I'll do some investigation and post both here and in the tech forum if applicable. If it is a bug, and you would have wanted to initiate combat, which I'm not sure you would, then I can go back and have the allies try to initiate combat.

8) yes
9) The Freccia will fly to the 1-box.
10) target the 0-box alone at first and sink the CP. Next the ships in the 0-box and then finally the ship in the 3-box. AA should be ne (only engaging 1 box at a time). Use SP to move attack up in columns.
Axis search roll was a 6 and the allies a 4. Neither side made contact.


Image
Attachments
02ALITAEastMed.jpg
02ALITAEastMed.jpg (332.07 KiB) Viewed 227 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

16. Do you still wish to attempt to initiate a naval combat in the Marianas?
I will pass at this time and wait for better opportunities
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #2. USSR Ground Strike Attempts.

The USSR will be attempting three air and one artillery ground strike. Only one of the three air ground strikes, which is indicated in red, can be intercepted by the Germans.

1. Do you wish to intercept and, if so, which unit(s) do you wish to intercept with?

The Soviets have NO fighters in position to counter-intercept if the Germans did to do so.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSRGSTKS.jpg
02ALUSSRGSTKS.jpg (1.1 MiB) Viewed 227 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

1. Do you wish to intercept and, if so, which unit(s) do you wish to intercept with?
Bf109 under Rommel will intercept.
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #2. USSR. Ground Strike 1.

Luftwaffe fighters waste no time in downing the Soviet bombers. At least the Soviet pilot survives.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSRGSTK1.jpg
02ALUSSRGSTK1.jpg (318.11 KiB) Viewed 227 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #2. USSR. Ground Strike 2.

All I can say is wow ... Soviet 122 mm artillery do a number on the Germans.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSRGSTK2.jpg
02ALUSSRGSTK2.jpg (383.28 KiB) Viewed 227 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #2. USSR. Ground Strike 3.

A miss ... but I'm not complaining after the result of the last ground strike.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSRGSTK3.jpg
02ALUSSRGSTK3.jpg (355.96 KiB) Viewed 227 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #2. USSR. Ground Strike 4.

Another miss ... still not complaining.

FYI - I'm going to be gone for the next hour or two. I'll finish my turn then ... Soviet land moves which is very critical and which I need to take time to think through.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSRGSTK4.jpg
02ALUSSRGSTK4.jpg (352.15 KiB) Viewed 227 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

I will be watching the rams game for the next several hours. Time to see them lose again :-)
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

I will be watching the rams game for the next several hours. Time to see them lose again :-)
[:D]
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #2. USSR Rail.

The Soviets rail the blue factory in Leningrad east to Akmolinsk.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSR..Akmolink.jpg
02ALUSSR..Akmolink.jpg (883.28 KiB) Viewed 225 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #2. The Eastern Front.

Post movement. No land combat.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSR..Movement.jpg
02ALUSSR..Movement.jpg (2.03 MiB) Viewed 225 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #2. USSR HQ Reorg.

Zhukov is used to reorganize the two air units disorganized by a Luftwaffe ground strike last impulse, hopefully saving them and their pilots from destruction. These two air units are located in Vila, Poland, which is the exposed salient in the Soviet northern lines.

Also, the Hero artillery unit is also reorganized.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSRHQReorg.jpg
02ALUSSRHQReorg.jpg (293.99 KiB) Viewed 225 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #2. USA HQ Reorg.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSAHQReorg.jpg
02ALUSAHQReorg.jpg (237.49 KiB) Viewed 225 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Axis #3. Weather.

Image
Attachments
03AXWEATHER.jpg
03AXWEATHER.jpg (705.89 KiB) Viewed 225 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

MA42 i3:
Germany takes a land, Japan a naval and Italy a combined.
Many Navy moves completed, made no interception attempts, since I was stopping in each zone except for this last move.
A CA in Tokyo picks up a division and moves into the China Sea.
Will the US subs intercept.

Image
Attachments
MAi3NavalMovement.jpg
MAi3NavalMovement.jpg (671.05 KiB) Viewed 225 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30243
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

A CA in Tokyo picks up a division and moves into the China Sea.
Will the US subs intercept.
No thank you.
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

MA42 i3: Naval Combat
Below is the image of the possible combats. Not shown are three areas where the axis have not initiated combat: The North Atlantic, Sea of Japan, and China Sea. The allies should have the option of initiating in the China Sea, but not the others.

I will attempt to proceed first in those areas least likely to require interaction.

Image
Attachments
MAi3Nava..mbatpre.jpg
MAi3Nava..mbatpre.jpg (916.1 KiB) Viewed 225 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

MA42 i3:
E. Med searches of 9/2 result in one CW CA finding. The could engage the 4-box but at best do an A on the axis and take a D 2A, so I am having the CW avoid the combat. Let me know if you'd like to redo this.

Image
Attachments
MAi3Nava..atEMed.jpg
MAi3Nava..atEMed.jpg (565.42 KiB) Viewed 225 times
Pat
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”