
Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Units Scrapped to Date. Communist Allies.


- Attachments
-
- 99Scrappe..tAllies.jpg (185.17 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
MA42: Axis Builds
GE (38): Synth, 2x pilot, ARM, AT gun, MAR-div, MTN, GAR, MOT, 2x FIG2
IT (10): pilot, FIG2, INF HQ, CP
JP (24): 3x pilot, TRAN-fu, CVL-fu, CP, FIG 2, NAV4, CVP0, MAR
GE (38): Synth, 2x pilot, ARM, AT gun, MAR-div, MTN, GAR, MOT, 2x FIG2
IT (10): pilot, FIG2, INF HQ, CP
JP (24): 3x pilot, TRAN-fu, CVL-fu, CP, FIG 2, NAV4, CVP0, MAR
Pat
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. End of Turn. Allied Builds. CW


- Attachments
-
- 99CWBuilds.jpg (372.83 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. End of Turn. Allied Builds. France.


- Attachments
-
- 99FRABuilds.jpg (231.89 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. End of Turn. Allied Builds. USA.


- Attachments
-
- 99USABuilds.jpg (392.65 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. End of Turn. Allied Builds. USSR.


- Attachments
-
- 99USSRBuilds.jpg (362.13 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. End of Turn. Conquests. Philippines by Japan.


- Attachments
-
- 99Conques..lippines.jpg (368.62 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. End of Turn. Conquests. British North Borneo by Japan.


- Attachments
-
- 99Conques..hBorneo.jpg (393.79 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. End of Turn. German Liberation Decisions.


- Attachments
-
- 99GermanLiberate.jpg (1.65 MiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
MJ42 Axis Reinforcements


- Attachments
-
- MJ42Axis..rcements.jpg (473.02 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Pat
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
I'm curious why the CW built TERR. This is something I never do; while some of them are very good, others are literally worthless, and I always know (Or at least I think I do. [:)]) which I am going to pick, and there are always better ways to spend two build points for the CW.
I thought I knew how to play this game....
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
It's those pesky Italians. They're moving all over Central Africa picking off countries at will.ORIGINAL: Courtenay
I'm curious why the CW built TERR. This is something I never do; while some of them are very good, others are literally worthless, and I always know (Or at least I think I do. [:)]) which I am going to pick, and there are always better ways to spend two build points for the CW.
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 17. May/June 1942. Deploy Units. CW.


- Attachments
-
- 00CWDeployUnits.jpg (245.19 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 17. May/June 1942. Deploy Units. USA.


- Attachments
-
- 00USADeployUnits.jpg (214.25 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 17. May/June 1942. Deploy Units. USSR.


- Attachments
-
- 00USSRDeployUnits.jpg (201.32 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 17. May/June 1942. Trade Changes.
1. France changed the 1 non-oil and 1-oil RP to CW to 2 non-oil RPs.
2. The USA started 2 BPs to USSR.

1. France changed the 1 non-oil and 1-oil RP to CW to 2 non-oil RPs.
2. The USA started 2 BPs to USSR.

- Attachments
-
- 00DeltaTrade.jpg (150.95 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 17. May/June 1942. Initiative.
The axis win the first roll for the initiative, the allies are in no position to demand a re-roll and the axis elect to move first.

The axis win the first roll for the initiative, the allies are in no position to demand a re-roll and the axis elect to move first.

- Attachments
-
- 00Initiative.jpg (180.3 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Turn 17. May/June 1942. Axis #1. Weather.


- Attachments
-
- 01AXWEATHER.jpg (579.47 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Ronnie
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
And you won't like this next move. I believe I'll get two more of those countries, including the Belgium Congo.quote:
ORIGINAL: Courtenay
I'm curious why the CW built TERR. This is something I never do; while some of them are very good, others are literally worthless, and I always know (Or at least I think I do. ) which I am going to pick, and there are always better ways to spend two build points for the CW.
It's those pesky Italians. They're moving all over Central Africa picking off countries at will.
Pat
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
MJ42 i1:
{Sorry for the delay. I have been sick the last couple of days and only now feeling well enough to continue}
All of the axis powers take land actions (This is taking a risk in the Pacific, but it was hard to ignore the clear weather in the N. Monsoon. I should be able to get a land path to the Burmese oil now).
The axis did fly two aircraft out to zones with allied units. The allies get to decide if they would like to initiate combat?

{Sorry for the delay. I have been sick the last couple of days and only now feeling well enough to continue}
All of the axis powers take land actions (This is taking a risk in the Pacific, but it was hard to ignore the clear weather in the N. Monsoon. I should be able to get a land path to the Burmese oil now).
The axis did fly two aircraft out to zones with allied units. The allies get to decide if they would like to initiate combat?

- Attachments
-
- MJ42i1al..itiation.jpg (1.21 MiB) Viewed 182 times
Pat


