Islands of Destiny: RA 5.0 Japanese Side

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

April 7, 1944

One would THINK a pair of WWI-Era DDs would get crushed in a surface action these days; however, that is not the case when two old Japanese veteran's enter the waters of Legaspi on April 7th. They find HUGE game in the form of BB North Carolina, a CA, and 8 DDs. Striking hard and fast they hit three American DDs close to 5,000 yards and then hightail it out of there. No DAMAGE!

As they run back towards Jolo for fuel and ammo, they hold off two American air attacks. A feeble CAP of 6 Fighters provides cover against strikes by 23 Fighters--16 Avengers and 6 Fighters--6 Avengers. Surprisingly their luck holds as CAP splashes 9 planes and AA gets a pair. Once again NO DAMAGE. Come on home Senior Citizens of the Japanese Fleet.


Image
Attachments
040744.jpg
040744.jpg (369.66 KiB) Viewed 90 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

Well...damn...if I didn't know what to look for I would have missed this.

OK.

We are now in the Kamikaze business.

Any advice, lessons learned, and/or what to do/not to is very appreciated.

Train to 50+ in Low Nav. Changing settings and beginning search of units for initial volunteers...


Image
Attachments
040744a.jpg
040744a.jpg (386.87 KiB) Viewed 90 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: April 1944

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Well...damn...if I didn't know what to look for I would have missed this.

OK.

We are now in the Kamikaze business.

Any advice, lessons learned, and/or what to do/not to is very appreciated.

Train to 50+ in Low Nav. Changing settings and beginning search of units for initial volunteers...

Thanks for being our JFB Guinea Pig, John. Many following this AAR (myself included alas) haven't gotten this far before either.

HOWEVER, I've been told that something that can move fast (evade CAP as much as possible) that carries an 800kg bomb is ideal. Failing that, something that moves fast that can carry 2+ 250kg bombs is pretty good too. What are your antiquated IJAAF pools looking like?

In particular, I'd look at old models of Helens, Sallys, Oscar IIa+ (when they get the 2x250kg payload), Lillys, etc. as some of my first airframes. I'd probably buy out one of the training groups in China for use in the PI. The Oscars would be nice from an AF1 behind the enemy lines in a 'quiet' area of the front where he may overlook CAP on his transport TFs.

I've read AARs wherein large Kamikaze attacks simply gut Allied massed CVEs, so I'm not sure about the 'won't damage anything larger than a DD' comment. Even a BB, afire and damaged, is a 'mission kill'-it will have to go back to a major repair port to get rid of sizable system damage.

Lastly, I would think about combining a kamikaze offensive of several groups with a traditional LBA and KB strike on susceptible shipping in the area.

Right now his defenses on his new beachheads are tenuous and tender. I'd expedite any counterattack and get what you can while you can. Trifling 3xDD and CA+3DD sweeps that net SCs and LCIs are better than nothing, but you've got to pin down and start killing bigger game. And soon.
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: April 1944

Post by Chickenboy »

From your screenshot:

I think you need to switch the training regimen to 'bombs' from torpedoes-otherwise the training will default to NavT. Then train them at 1000 feet, not 20,000 feet for LowNav training to be in effect.

There's no benefit to max training at 21 hexes-that may contribute to unit fatigue and airframe aging. I'd drop this to 0 or 1 range.

Are you sure that you want to use 2E Betties instead of superfluous B5N1s or B5N2s in your IJNAF training regimen?
Image
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9891
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: April 1944

Post by ny59giants »

Kamikazes - Look for airframes with the following characteristics - speed, payload, and/or ceiling. Can they get there before being shot down? If they do hit, its with some serious ordnance. Can they fly above most of Allied fighters before they dive to their death?
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

From your screenshot:

I think you need to switch the training regimen to 'bombs' from torpedoes-otherwise the training will default to NavT. Then train them at 1000 feet, not 20,000 feet for LowNav training to be in effect.

There's no benefit to max training at 21 hexes-that may contribute to unit fatigue and airframe aging. I'd drop this to 0 or 1 range.

Are you sure that you want to use 2E Betties instead of superfluous B5N1s or B5N2s in your IJNAF training regimen?

That unit was just an example of finding the actual Kamikaze BUTTON. Just went through the Home Islands writing down a list of units for use and changing them to more appropriate selections.

A couple of weeks ago I bumped Jill and Judy production to add to my current surplus numbers...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

Keep commenting. Am taking notes and will use tonight's turn for a serious planning turn going through airframes, training, and locations.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

My initial plan is to create 5-6 units to use as 'decoys' to saturate Dan's CAP and see if we can get any REAL attack aircraft. Better to get organized and strike with MASS then go in piecemeal.

Just checked the reinforcements due in Luzon over the next 3-4 days: 19th ID, 48 ID, and two Brigades.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
adarbrauner
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:40 am
Location: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy

RE: April 1944

Post by adarbrauner »

The reinforcements to Luzon are not enough, to say the least, if you wont to fight for it. If he has 4-5 divisions, you need the same number at least. Actually you needed them yesterday.

The idea is not not attack (well in anycase we don't have the force nor shall we have before a week. start move troops fast boy!), but rather to place a stop and a big menace to his contingent.

I fully agree with CRSutton about the immense menace of enemy's potential perspective big airbases.

For this reason I don't agree with chicken boy about the 2nd-3rd importance of the smaller Phillipines Islands, exactly the opposite, they have the same importance of Luzon.

We are out of time a little, because I,understand that there are much unsufficient forces in Philippiones now and in the very short next future (days). a pity, because the absence of Mian American Carrier Fleet cannt be exploited in this sense. Never mind, the islands are so close one to each others, that if we manage to bring close troops in land bases, they could be landed in an overnight .

Barges, many many barges needed. also AKLs. But Commander, you should have already a good number of LST, don't you?
Lastly, I would think about combining a kamikaze offensive of several groups with a traditional LBA and KB strike on susceptible shipping in the area.

Right now his defenses on his new beachheads are tenuous and tender. I'd expedite any counterattack and get what you can while you can. Trifling 3xDD and CA+3DD sweeps that net SCs and LCIs are better than nothing, but you've got to pin down and start killing bigger game. And soon.

Depends: if Main Carrier Fleet is absent, so yes, very soon, combining surface attacks as well (P.S.: PTs, where?)
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: April 1944

Post by MakeeLearn »

What aerial recon tactics are you conducting?






User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

What do you mean?

I have 5-6 air search groups flying. Am flying recon over his Luzon bases as well.

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: adarbrauner

The reinforcements to Luzon are not enough, to say the least, if you wont to fight for it. If he has 4-5 divisions, you need the same number at least. Actually you needed them yesterday.

The idea is not not attack (well in anycase we don't have the force nor shall we have before a week. start move troops fast boy!), but rather to place a stop and a big menace to his contingent.

I fully agree with CRSutton about the immense menace of enemy's potential perspective big airbases.

For this reason I don't agree with chicken boy about the 2nd-3rd importance of the smaller Phillipines Islands, exactly the opposite, they have the same importance of Luzon.

We are out of time a little, because I,understand that there are much unsufficient forces in Philippiones now and in the very short next future (days). a pity, because the absence of Mian American Carrier Fleet cannt be exploited in this sense. Never mind, the islands are so close one to each others, that if we manage to bring close troops in land bases, they could be landed in an overnight .

Barges, many many barges needed. also AKLs. But Commander, you should have already a good number of LST, don't you?
Lastly, I would think about combining a kamikaze offensive of several groups with a traditional LBA and KB strike on susceptible shipping in the area.

Right now his defenses on his new beachheads are tenuous and tender. I'd expedite any counterattack and get what you can while you can. Trifling 3xDD and CA+3DD sweeps that net SCs and LCIs are better than nothing, but you've got to pin down and start killing bigger game. And soon.

Depends: if Main Carrier Fleet is absent, so yes, very soon, combining surface attacks as well (P.S.: PTs, where?)

His ENTIRE force is present.

My CVs just rendezvoused at Marcus and shall move SW. Am thinking about waiting and watching for an opportunity to strike a portion of his TFs either returning from the Philippines or waiting for escort up to the Philippines. The base where he gathers his shipping is Sorong.

My real opinion is delay and fight in Luzon while putting the kitchen sink into Formosa. As long as I have control there, convoys can still move along the coast going to Japan. Obviously any base in the Okinawa area would need garrisoning. Already have troops in Okinawa building AF and Forts.

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: April 1944

Post by MakeeLearn »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

What do you mean?

I have 5-6 air search groups flying. Am flying recon over his Luzon bases as well.



Land vs Naval , plane type ,number, targets, intensity... etc. How does recon figure into your overall strategy?






User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Well...damn...if I didn't know what to look for I would have missed this.

OK.

We are now in the Kamikaze business.

Any advice, lessons learned, and/or what to do/not to is very appreciated.

Train to 50+ in Low Nav. Changing settings and beginning search of units for initial volunteers...

Thanks for being our JFB Guinea Pig, John. Many following this AAR (myself included alas) haven't gotten this far before either.

HOWEVER, I've been told that something that can move fast (evade CAP as much as possible) that carries an 800kg bomb is ideal. Failing that, something that moves fast that can carry 2+ 250kg bombs is pretty good too. What are your antiquated IJAAF pools looking like?

In particular, I'd look at old models of Helens, Sallys, Oscar IIa+ (when they get the 2x250kg payload), Lillys, etc. as some of my first airframes. I'd probably buy out one of the training groups in China for use in the PI. The Oscars would be nice from an AF1 behind the enemy lines in a 'quiet' area of the front where he may overlook CAP on his transport TFs.

I've read AARs wherein large Kamikaze attacks simply gut Allied massed CVEs, so I'm not sure about the 'won't damage anything larger than a DD' comment. Even a BB, afire and damaged, is a 'mission kill'-it will have to go back to a major repair port to get rid of sizable system damage.

Lastly, I would think about combining a kamikaze offensive of several groups with a traditional LBA and KB strike on susceptible shipping in the area.

Right now his defenses on his new beachheads are tenuous and tender. I'd expedite any counterattack and get what you can while you can. Trifling 3xDD and CA+3DD sweeps that net SCs and LCIs are better than nothing, but you've got to pin down and start killing bigger game. And soon.

Readers: This is going to be a Kamikaze Training Class. I have seen success in getting through the massed CAP by coming in at 1,000 Ft. It seems to be to do some real damage/hopes for REAL damage one needs to come in damned low and damned high.

Scenario: Five Kamikaze Groups attack with conventional air. Use four of the five at 2-3,000 Ft and one at 30,000 Ft while the real strike aircraft come in at 11,000 Ft. What would you set your fighters at?

What works here and what does not?

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

What do you mean?

I have 5-6 air search groups flying. Am flying recon over his Luzon bases as well.



Land vs Naval , plane type ,number, targets, intensity... etc. How does recon figure into your overall strategy?

Considering aircraft losses, I keep about 30-40 planes (mainly Emily/Judy-R) doing air search in the area blanketing the whole of the Philippines. Use the Dinah for more air search as well as direct base recon from high altitude.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
pws1225
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Tate's Hell, Florida

RE: April 1944

Post by pws1225 »

I respectfully disagree. If you lose Luzon, your LOC between the DEI and the HI are effectively cut. CR's air and naval forces will see to that. You simply must defeat his attempt to take the island. There is no other choice or you lose the war.

P.S.: I would offer advice on tactics, but as a reader of both AARs, I must refrain. I simply state the obvious on the importance of holding Luzon.

BTW, great AAR. I haven't had this much fun following the forums since Little Ship That Could was my morning dose.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

Comparing our AARs to Little Ship That Could is high praised and I am honored Sir. Thank you for that thought. I loved that AAR as well.

PLEASE convey the same thought to Dan.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
adarbrauner
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:40 am
Location: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy

RE: April 1944

Post by adarbrauner »

I may agree 100% with what pws1225 wrote (regarding Luzon and Philippines). Allied Philippines = B 29 over Home Islands (+ conventional nuclearization of Formosa) + no more free shipping to DEI.

So why?
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17627
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1944

Post by John 3rd »

April 8, 1944

The foxes got into the Hen House. Not an impressive haul but CA Mikuma and 4 DDs manage to sink all three TFs of LCT for total of 20. Third raid to hit pay dirt with NO LOSS.

Watching the peaceful transfer of power this day so nothing more until I get home tonight.


Image
Attachments
040844.jpg
040844.jpg (366.05 KiB) Viewed 90 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
adarbrauner
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:40 am
Location: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy

RE: April 1944

Post by adarbrauner »

This is the kind of operations we need, reiterated. slow progressive clever attrition. Also of his logistic arm.

What about your SuW an ASW? it has been a while we hadn't had an update.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”