Simply, one cannot be found guilty of spambottery if the quality of the posts are of sufficient... er... well, quality.
For example I have over 30,000 posts. But I do not look at that number in isolation, nor do I look at the length of time I have been on the forums. No, instead I - and this been confirmed by my fellow forumites - have over 30,000 quality posts.
Who can forget these gems:
31/12/2008
quote: warspite1
+1
3/4/2009
quote: warspite1
Look at the funbags on that!
10/5/2010
quote: warspite1
I disagree
14/5/2014
quote: warspite1
Yes, but to be fair, I was innocent, the judge was biased, and everyone knows these restraining orders are manifestly unfair
quote: warspite1
+1 - I wholly agree with the other 133 posters about this. That ******** Chickenboy is a ******** *****
And as for testimonials - I have them too
3/06/2009
Quote: Mummywarspite1
As can be seen. Quality oozes from every pore of this fine wordsmith. He is as erudite as he is handsome
