ORIGINAL: John 3rd
THERE is a hidden gem! PSYCHE WARFARE!! Let us all wage an unrelenting war against Dan by boosting Posts counts, hits, and comments.
SPAMMING FOR THE EMPEROR! BANZAI! BANZAI! BANZAI!
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: John 3rd
THERE is a hidden gem! PSYCHE WARFARE!! Let us all wage an unrelenting war against Dan by boosting Posts counts, hits, and comments.


Public information is as public information does. Not my leak. Not my monkeys and not my zoo. Nothing wrong with acknowledging that which is plainly stated elsewhere.ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I think it is a bad idea to even joke about opsec leaks-- especially when there are dual AARs. Nothing could create bad blood faster and ruin a great game imho.

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition Rule #1:
![]()

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Public information is as public information does. Not my leak. Not my monkeys and not my zoo. Nothing wrong with acknowledging that which is plainly stated elsewhere.ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I think it is a bad idea to even joke about opsec leaks-- especially when there are dual AARs. Nothing could create bad blood faster and ruin a great game imho.
This is the reason why I stopped reading and commenting on dual AARs years ago. Now I only read/comment on one side.
My guess is that the individual with the OPSEC "issues" is new to the forums and doesn't understand the significance of his leak. He should be PM'ed by the affected parties and led to understand the nature of the grievance against him.
If it was a significant (and real) breach, Canoerebel probably should have *not* responded in a mutually accessible thread to the original question, but rather quickly plug that breach by PM instead and asked the original poster to kindly delete his post on the matter discretely.
ETA: I will PM the original party and explain my perspective on this matter.
+1ORIGINAL: John 3rd
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition Rule #1:
![]()
LOVE that!





[/center]

