B1 and F35 joint strikes

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
Magnus78
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:16 pm

B1 and F35 joint strikes

Post by Magnus78 »

I read in the aviationist today that the F35 guided B1 strikes during Red Flag 17-1. Is there a way to simulate this in CMANO?
Dimitris
Posts: 15371
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: B1 and F35 joint strikes

Post by Dimitris »

"Guided" = ?
User avatar
HalfLifeExpert
Posts: 1342
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 3:39 pm
Location: California, United States

RE: B1 and F35 joint strikes

Post by HalfLifeExpert »

yeah I think you will have to be more specific there.....
User avatar
wild_Willie2
Posts: 2934
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...

RE: B1 and F35 joint strikes

Post by wild_Willie2 »

I think that every single AC can already "guide" any other AC in game as every single piece of information from any single AC can be used by any other AC in-game.
This is totally not realistic, but is a compromise in order to make the game playable.

W.

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.
poaw
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

RE: B1 and F35 joint strikes

Post by poaw »

ORIGINAL: Magnus78

I read in the aviationist today that the F35 guided B1 strikes during Red Flag 17-1. Is there a way to simulate this in CMANO?

Yes. Targets in an unknown location or with a large ambiguity zone. Cloud layer obscuring and EMCON preventing local targeting by the B-1B. Fly an F-35 under the cloud layer to use DAS or use ELINT to locate targets for B-1B to drop JDAMs on.

If you want something even more direct, use the mixed loadout with LJDAMs and put the F-35 under the clouds to lase mobile targets for the B-1B.
Magnus78
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:16 pm

RE: B1 and F35 joint strikes

Post by Magnus78 »

Sorry for being vague... I was on mobile in a hurry =)

Here's a quote from The Aviationist since I can't post links yet...
"The recently revealed reports suggest that large-scale F-35A strikes were conducted in a highly contested/denied aerial environment. Air Force F-35As penetrated denied airspace and directed standoff weapons from B-1B heavy bombers flying outside the denied airspace. Those strikes destroyed simulated surface to air weapons systems. This suggests some of the exercises were an example of a “first day of war” scenario where Air Force F-35As spearheaded an attack on a heavily defended target set both in the air and on the ground. The F-35As entered the denied airspace and engaged both aerial and ground targets, not only with weapons they carried but also with weapons launched from other platforms such as the B-1Bs as they loitered just outside the threat environment acting as “bomb trucks.”"

So, I guess this suggests that they used LJDAMS?
Cik
Posts: 671
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:22 am

RE: B1 and F35 joint strikes

Post by Cik »

well, even assuming that there is no datalinking possible between B1 <---> F35 (and that may not be true) you can always "go around the problem" by just passing MGRS grid references or lat/long to the B1 crews. once they create a steerpoint/markpoint/B1 equivalent they can throw all the ordnance desired at the target from wherever they are.

buddy lase is also a possibility ofc.
User avatar
kevinkins
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:54 am

RE: B1 and F35 joint strikes

Post by kevinkins »

The Aviationist article pretty much sums up my understanding of the role of the F35 over the next several years. Let's bundle an "AWACS and JSTARS" into a stealth fighter. I imagine the technical leap was being able to reduce the weight of the powerful electronics needed to provide those a-traditional fighter capabilities.

Kevin
“The study of history lies at the foundation of all sound military conclusions and practice.”
Alfred Thayer Mahan
User avatar
SeaQueen
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Washington D.C.

RE: B1 and F35 joint strikes

Post by SeaQueen »

It'd be fairly easy to model that sort of behavior in Command. You would give the bombers a "Patrol - ASuW (Ground)" mission and then have it stand off out of the weapons range of whatever is in the area you intend to send the F-35s into. Give a similar mission to the F-35s directly over the area you intend to engage ground and air targets in. Give the bombers an engagement area for their mission that is identical to or encompasses the F-35's area. Every time something pops up, if the F-35s can't smack it, the bombers will.

ORIGINAL: Magnus78

Sorry for being vague... I was on mobile in a hurry =)

Here's a quote from The Aviationist since I can't post links yet...
"The recently revealed reports suggest that large-scale F-35A strikes were conducted in a highly contested/denied aerial environment. Air Force F-35As penetrated denied airspace and directed standoff weapons from B-1B heavy bombers flying outside the denied airspace. Those strikes destroyed simulated surface to air weapons systems. This suggests some of the exercises were an example of a “first day of war” scenario where Air Force F-35As spearheaded an attack on a heavily defended target set both in the air and on the ground. The F-35As entered the denied airspace and engaged both aerial and ground targets, not only with weapons they carried but also with weapons launched from other platforms such as the B-1Bs as they loitered just outside the threat environment acting as “bomb trucks.”"

So, I guess this suggests that they used LJDAMS?
magi
Posts: 1533
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:06 am

RE: B1 and F35 joint strikes

Post by magi »

yes just use the f35 as an isr asset for the b-1b.... walla.... pow hanna... time to go home....
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”