Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

SO42 i3 ending situation in Easter Siberia. I see a long drawn out battle for Vladivostok in my future. May the Americans continue to be mesmerized by North Africa.

Image
Attachments
SO42i3E..anFront.jpg
SO42i3E..anFront.jpg (1.96 MiB) Viewed 392 times
Pat
WIF_Killzone
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:51 pm

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by WIF_Killzone »

Someone needs recalled to have a little chat with Stalin.
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: WIF_Killzone

Someone needs recalled to have a little chat with Stalin.
The commanding general was gracious enough to save Stalin the paperwork. [:D]


Image
Attachments
05ALSave..aperwork.jpg
05ALSave..aperwork.jpg (4.99 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #5. Actions.

Image
Attachments
05ALActions.jpg
05ALActions.jpg (541.34 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #5. Allied Ground Strikes.

The USN and RN are attempting 4 ground strikes. The axis have two fighter units and one AA division that can opposed these are strikes. The RN has 3 carrier units on standby that can counter-intercept.

Do the axis wish to opposed these ground strikes? If so, how?

Image
Attachments
05ALWEST..Question.jpg
05ALWEST..Question.jpg (692.67 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

The USN and RN are attempting 4 ground strikes. The axis have two fighter units and one AA division that can opposed these are strikes. The RN has 3 carrier units on standby that can counter-intercept.

Do the axis wish to opposed these ground strikes? If so, how?
No interceptions.
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #5. Ground Strikes 1 & 2.

Image
Attachments
05ALGSTK12.jpg
05ALGSTK12.jpg (595.81 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #5. Ground Strikes 3 & 4.

Well, those four ground strikes were a total waste of aviation fuel. It's a miracle that the air crews managed to find their way back to their carriers. Much less land on them.

Speaking of landing, it's dinner time here ... so I'll be away for a while ...

Image
Attachments
05ALGSTK34.jpg
05ALGSTK34.jpg (663.21 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #5. Anglo-American Amphibious Invasions. Questions for the Axis.

Anglo-American forces are attempting two amphibious invasions as shown in this screen cap.

1. Do the axis want to include the nationals for both attacks?

The estimated odds after the allies have applied the maximum shore bombardment and HQ support are shown. Also shown are the axis air units that can provide defensive ground support and escort. The allies have no planes in position that can provide offensive ground support, however they are three RN air units that can intercept if necessary.

2. How and where do the axis wish to allocate their planes for defensive ground support?

Image
Attachments
05ALQUA..otionals.jpg
05ALQUA..otionals.jpg (844.81 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Anglo-American forces are attempting two amphibious invasions as shown in this screen cap.

1. Do the axis want to include the nationals for both attacks?

The estimated odds after the allies have applied the maximum shore bombardment and HQ support are shown. Also shown are the axis air units that can provide defensive ground support and escort. The allies have no planes in position that can provide offensive ground support, however they are three RN air units that can intercept if necessary.

2. How and where do the axis wish to allocate their planes for defensive ground support?
I think I have to declare the notional before the land ground support is resolved. If that is the case I will take the notional in both combats. If I can wait till after the ground support aircraft, then the Lisbon notional will not be accepted if the ground support gets through.

Ground support. The Ju 87D (6 pt GS) and the Italian FIG, flying as a bomber in the lead position, fly over Lisbon. The Ju87R (4 pt GS) and He 111H fly to the southern attack to support the notional troops. The He 111H takes the lead.
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #2. Amphibious Invasion, Lisbon. Pre-attack Land Combat Analysis.

In order to build up a little suspense, or actually delay the inevitable, this cap shows the estimated pre-attack odds (bottom panel) for the amphibious landing attempt against Lisbon. The top panel shows the result of the air to air combat for ground support. It didn't go well for the allies. Hopefully the land combat will.

By the way, one must declare notionals before shore bombardment and ground support, which is the reason that the Lisbon notional is included in the defense.

Image
Attachments
05ALAMPHLibson.jpg
05ALAMPHLibson.jpg (655.95 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #2. Amphibious Invasion, Portugal. Pre-attack Land Combat Analysis.

More suspense ... really more procrastination in delaying the inevitable. Or, I like to think of it as a practical application of Schrödinger's cat. I've both won and loss until I actually make the die rolls, with my focus on the "won part".

By the way, the air to air combat for ground support again went poorly for the allies.

Image
Attachments
05ALAMPHPortugal.jpg
05ALAMPHPortugal.jpg (609.82 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #5. Amphibious Invasion, Lisbon.

The landing's a success. Costly, but still a success.

A German u-boat and two battleships were overrun. I moved the u-boat to Gibraltar. I moved the two battleships through the Bay of Biscay to Bordeaux. These two fleeing battleships were subject to intercept by the allies, however, the threat was much weaker in the Bay of Biscay, so weak in fact that I declined to intercept.

OK, now we see whether Alexander stands a with his HQ unit on the continent or if the second landing is able to establish a beachhead.

Image
Attachments
05ALAMPHLCLibson.jpg
05ALAMPHLCLibson.jpg (324.04 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #5. Amphibious Invasion, Portugal.

Success! Now that the EASY part is over, comes the hard part, which is to survive and maintain a presence on the Continent.

Image
Attachments
05ALAMPH..Portugal.jpg
05ALAMPH..Portugal.jpg (312.48 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #5. USN, Naval Reorg.

Image
Attachments
05ALUSN..alReorg.jpg
05ALUSN..alReorg.jpg (239.11 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #5. Newly Established and Most Vulnerable Western Front.

Image
Attachments
05ALWESTEurope.jpg
05ALWESTEurope.jpg (759.08 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #5. Western Allies, Central Africa.

Well let's don't forget about Africa. The axis are running wild! Looks like another colony or two will fall to the Italians.

Image
Attachments
05ALCentralAfrica.jpg
05ALCentralAfrica.jpg (1.38 MiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #5. USSR, Rail. Blue Factory.

Image
Attachments
05ALUSSR..Factory.jpg
05ALUSSR..Factory.jpg (909.1 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #5. USSR, Post Move and no air or land combat.

I need a very good weather roll and by very good I mean bad weather in the East. The worse the better!

Image
Attachments
05ALUSSREurope.jpg
05ALUSSREurope.jpg (3.33 MiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 31701
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #5. USSR, Asia.

Image
Attachments
05ALUSSRAsia1.jpg
05ALUSSRAsia1.jpg (831.89 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Ronnie
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”