US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: MOD_Flashpoint

User avatar
MikeJ19
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by MikeJ19 »

Here is a more complete version of the comparison - with an analysis that reflects the right scenario...

Image
Attachments
Picture3.jpg
Picture3.jpg (137.87 KiB) Viewed 579 times
Mike

Retired Gunner
User avatar
MikeJ19
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by MikeJ19 »

Finally found some time to play ...

Thoughts

Option 2 is the one that gives me the best chance to win. I can disrupt the Soviet advance, seize some VP locations and hopefully punish the lead Soviet forces early.

I’m making a slight change in the Option, moving the 2nd Armd to the North and the 4th Inf into the middle. This would permit me to use the valley/depression along the Wumme river in the North more effectively and maybe I could hit the Soviets farther to the East.

I’m going to send my Cobras along the Weser River to strike the Soviets far to the East – coming out on the Eastern side of the woods that at South East of Sagehorn

My Arty is going to place minefields near Fischerhude by the bridges to slow the Soviets down if they come in from the North.

I’m expecting the Soviets are going to come quickly and in force – I need to remember this and not be surprised.
Mike

Retired Gunner
User avatar
MikeJ19
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by MikeJ19 »

Contact...

Image
Attachments
Picture4.jpg
Picture4.jpg (313.71 KiB) Viewed 579 times
Mike

Retired Gunner
User avatar
MikeJ19
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by MikeJ19 »

Here they come in force ...

Image
Attachments
Picture5.jpg
Picture5.jpg (270.77 KiB) Viewed 579 times
Mike

Retired Gunner
User avatar
MikeJ19
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by MikeJ19 »

Having fun...

Image
Attachments
Picture6.jpg
Picture6.jpg (275.32 KiB) Viewed 579 times
Mike

Retired Gunner
User avatar
MikeJ19
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by MikeJ19 »

Going well - the Soviets are adapting

Image
Attachments
Picture7.jpg
Picture7.jpg (274.64 KiB) Viewed 579 times
Mike

Retired Gunner
User avatar
MikeJ19
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by MikeJ19 »

Game over ...

Image
Attachments
Picture8.jpg
Picture8.jpg (266.44 KiB) Viewed 579 times
Mike

Retired Gunner
User avatar
MikeJ19
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by MikeJ19 »

Here is the overall kills...

Image
Attachments
Picture9.jpg
Picture9.jpg (260.38 KiB) Viewed 579 times
Mike

Retired Gunner
User avatar
MikeJ19
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by MikeJ19 »

The result for the campaign

Image
Attachments
Picture10.jpg
Picture10.jpg (266.53 KiB) Viewed 579 times
Mike

Retired Gunner
User avatar
MikeJ19
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by MikeJ19 »

AAR

What did I do right?

Switching the 2nd Armd Bn to the North was a good idea. I was able to deal more effectively with the Soviet threat from the North.

The overall plan was good – get into location quickly and then eat up the Soviet attacks.

I used Assault movement to get my forces in place initially and that worked well.

Delaying the engagement of the Cobras was a good idea as it allowed me to take out a lot of the Soviet AD systems.

What could I improve on?

I left at least one HQ behind in the initial deployment – not a good idea.

Should have switched the tanks of 2nd Armd into hold tasks earlier. I would likely have taken less damage.



Thoughts on the scenario/game

This scenario was fun. It did not last long, but it was really nice to see my plan come together. Overall, it was short and sweet!

The campaign was fun too. It was very cool using the same units through 5 scenarios and I was able to better understand how to use them. I’m happy with the outcome of the campaign, would have loved a decisive result, but a tactical one was the right answer.


Mike

Retired Gunner
Enigma6584
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:44 am

RE: US Campaign - Battle Royal

Post by Enigma6584 »

Again, bravo sir!
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”