I was a bit surprised to see myself replying to a request for an opponent as I was not planning to do another game of WitE - but when I saw this post I thought yes I want to do that! So I am very grateful to MarauderPL for choosing me.
I have dipped in to MarauderPL's videos before. But my best experience was of a real life friend who took up the game seriously after seeing the videos. I had introduced them to the game knowing they would like it - but only if they got past the hurdle of learning how to play. I imagine they probably never would have bothered going through the manual first. There are times when "show do not tell" really is the best way - and after watching some of the videos they are now hooked and have the joy (or curse) of playing it for hours as I do. So I think those who enjoy and love the game should support initiatives like this.
I know from my brief forays into videos that the time to set them up properly is longer than you might think. MarauderPL is the director and lead actor, I am only a supporting player. But I am excited and hope I can do my bit to make them the most interesting and informative videos. As such "winning" will take second place to whatever makes the YouTube videos great. And if showing information about the Axis side is the best for that, that is what I will go with.
Now as supporting actor I hope my role is not to be the innocent and hapless, but oh so beautiful, victim who dies in the opening scene. If I can avoid MarauderPL marching into Poland in 1942 I think MarauderPL will like to go for the full 200+ turns game. I have warned MarauderPL that I am not a quick player. Even without real life interruptions I do not do a turn a day apart from maybe a very quiet bad weather turn - and do not know how anyone can. And in particular I take longer for the first few turns as I set up everything the way I like it. So in my experience the long game is months rather than weeks. Hopefully the quality makes the wait worthwhile?
I suggested the no+1/full blizzard partly because I think it is quicker. Having to worry less about an opponents counters during your offensives shaves miliseconds of every move which adds up to a lot over a whole game. I guess this is the other side of being interesting. Also there is the point about +1 in first blizzard making an unbalanced game - so what is tactically interesting could be strategically less interesting. I had personal reasons for prefering no+1/ full blizzard as I am more used to it and would have to get a feel again for the other rule set. But I left MarauderPL to make the final decision knowing these possibilities as I think the creative director should have full discretion to make their baby. I know I may be making MarauderPL out to be Fellini directing his next cinematic masterpiece - but what is good enough for the Oscars is good enough for YouTube War in the East videos!
MarauderPL wants to go with +1/mild blizzard and I will support that. When I started playing WitE there were no options for reduced blizzard or no+1 - you had to take it all and like it. The blizzard is if anything less severe now. So we forget what a luxury it is to have these possibilities. But if it does lead to my humiliating defeat at least I have the consolation of knowing no one will see it except MarauderPL and myself. And the millions who watch YouTube every day! So you will have a superb instructional video in why not to have +1/mild blizzard!
ORIGINAL: Stelteck
I hope to see the ludicrous +1 soviet blizzard between expert players in an AAR one day, it looks really fun [;)]
I think Stelteck will be hiring out a cinema to watch it on a big screen from the front row with a crate of popcorn to really "enjoy" the experience! [;)]
My opening turn is in and I have chosen a different from the normal opening in the South. Probably the worst one given the game options chosen. But certainly the more interesting one. Game on - and look forward to seeing your comments on the YouTube video page!