If you could only get ONE of these games.....

[aaatoysandmore]

What would you get?

Heroes of Normandie

Strategic Command III

Tigers on the Hunt

Just one of the three now, no buy them all stuff. [:D]

[zakblood]

Strategic Command III, as i have both of the other 2[:D]

[rico21]

The one who speaks of Bastogne [:D]

[wesy]

Don't have Heroes, but I have the other two. I play SC3 the most

[Wolfe1759]

I have them all, if I could only have one then it would definitely be SC3

[MrsWargamer]

Likely SC3.

But something inside tells me I was supposed to say Tigers on the Hunt.

[Alan Sharif]

Another vote for SC3.

[Yogi the Great]

I think the odds statistically are that more people would prefer SC3.

If you do happen to be a fan of the old Avalon Hill squad leader, advanced squad leader or similar games go for Tigers on the Hunt.

[ezzler]

I have Heroes of Normandie and Tigers on the Hunt.

Normandie is more a puzzle game. You need to perform actions in the correct sequence or you quickly lose.Its not like a wargame at all. I never play it.

Tigers is good. But the interface that everyone said was confusing before release, is still confusing. And unless there have been some updates the lack of knowing if an attack will do anything at all before its tried is burdensome.
There is a good game in there. But its quite a chore to play.

So, kind of wish I'd got SC3 instead.

[Ranger33]

Been thinking about getting it for a while, and just got my very nice Matrix anniversary coupon, decided to pick up SC3 based on these comments. I played the WW1 version quite a bit, looking forward to trying the new and improved edition.

[aaatoysandmore]

What's the AI like in SC3?

[wodin]

If and when a WW1 version of SC3 comes out then it would bee SC3. If and when Tigers brings in things like obstacles, mines etc etc then that might pip the others, any new tactical wargame I buy has to do things that others haven't done. Otherwise I'd happily pass on them all

[InfamousMMA]

Tigers on the Hunt
OFC