The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
11/16/44
Self-Destruction: You know that Japanese division sitting astride the main road in rough terrain that I was going to have to deal with? John ordered a shock attack in hopes that his troops would face just the two small armored units. But two US Army divisions arrived at just that moment. This is how a fresh and strong enemy division becomes battered:
Ground combat at 84,59 (near Foochow)
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 12082 troops, 94 guns, 32 vehicles, Assault Value = 437
Defending force 23231 troops, 417 guns, 662 vehicles, Assault Value = 738
Japanese adjusted assault: 10
Allied adjusted defense: 1211
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 121
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), disruption(-)
Japanese ground losses:
4202 casualties reported
Squads: 27 destroyed, 378 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 33 disabled
Guns lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Vehicles lost 12 (1 destroyed, 11 disabled)
Assaulting units:
35th Division
Defending units:
44th Tank Battalion
706th Tank Battalion
33rd Infantry Division
7th Infantry Division
The Allied units will probably shock attack tomorrow.
Self-Destruction: You know that Japanese division sitting astride the main road in rough terrain that I was going to have to deal with? John ordered a shock attack in hopes that his troops would face just the two small armored units. But two US Army divisions arrived at just that moment. This is how a fresh and strong enemy division becomes battered:
Ground combat at 84,59 (near Foochow)
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 12082 troops, 94 guns, 32 vehicles, Assault Value = 437
Defending force 23231 troops, 417 guns, 662 vehicles, Assault Value = 738
Japanese adjusted assault: 10
Allied adjusted defense: 1211
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 121
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), disruption(-)
Japanese ground losses:
4202 casualties reported
Squads: 27 destroyed, 378 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 33 disabled
Guns lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Vehicles lost 12 (1 destroyed, 11 disabled)
Assaulting units:
35th Division
Defending units:
44th Tank Battalion
706th Tank Battalion
33rd Infantry Division
7th Infantry Division
The Allied units will probably shock attack tomorrow.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Obviously there was a difference in opinion in the leadership ranks of the 35th Division. The double leadership effect strikes again.[:)]
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 12082 troops, 94 guns, 32 vehicles, Assault Value = 437
Defending force 23231 troops, 417 guns, 662 vehicles, Assault Value = 738
Japanese adjusted assault: 10
Allied adjusted defense: 1211
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 121
A real, live banzai charge! With real life results.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Is OOPs appropriate here?
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
That will be ugly. [&:]ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
11/16/44
Self-Destruction: You know that Japanese division sitting astride the main road in rough terrain that I was going to have to deal with? John ordered a shock attack in hopes that his troops would face just the two small armored units. But two US Army divisions arrived at just that moment. This is how a fresh and strong enemy division becomes battered:
Ground combat at 84,59 (near Foochow)
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 12082 troops, 94 guns, 32 vehicles, Assault Value = 437
Defending force 23231 troops, 417 guns, 662 vehicles, Assault Value = 738
Japanese adjusted assault: 10
Allied adjusted defense: 1211
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 121
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), disruption(-)
Japanese ground losses:
4202 casualties reported
Squads: 27 destroyed, 378 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 33 disabled
Guns lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Vehicles lost 12 (1 destroyed, 11 disabled)
Assaulting units:
35th Division
Defending units:
44th Tank Battalion
706th Tank Battalion
33rd Infantry Division
7th Infantry Division
The Allied units will probably shock attack tomorrow.
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
There's a lot behind that shock attack - the give and take of the game, the taking of risks, the rewards or penalties, the ebb and flow. Here he took a calculated risk that he probably couldn't afford to take and it stung him.
In recent days, John has downed a fair bit of Allied dive bombers, his fighters and/or weather have blunted my strategic bombing, and today a beat up IJA 2nd Div. shock attacked a destroyed a US Army tank battalion. All of those were good things for him.
Yesterday, my two "naked" armored units found themselves in the same hex with 35th Division. He probably knew other Allied units were inbound for the adjacent hex, but he decided to gamble that they wouldn't arrive the very next turn. He lost the gamble and trashed his division. With that many disablements, the Allied shock attack tomorrow should really pulverize 35th Div.
If you go way back through the game, you'll find many instances in which John attacked - deliberate sometimes, shock other times - when he shouldn't have. He's done it recently in coastal China; he did it early in China and Singapore.
John should be using his units to distract or slow the Allied advance but here he neutered a strong unit that was in a great position to serve as a roadblock.
In recent days, John has downed a fair bit of Allied dive bombers, his fighters and/or weather have blunted my strategic bombing, and today a beat up IJA 2nd Div. shock attacked a destroyed a US Army tank battalion. All of those were good things for him.
Yesterday, my two "naked" armored units found themselves in the same hex with 35th Division. He probably knew other Allied units were inbound for the adjacent hex, but he decided to gamble that they wouldn't arrive the very next turn. He lost the gamble and trashed his division. With that many disablements, the Allied shock attack tomorrow should really pulverize 35th Div.
If you go way back through the game, you'll find many instances in which John attacked - deliberate sometimes, shock other times - when he shouldn't have. He's done it recently in coastal China; he did it early in China and Singapore.
John should be using his units to distract or slow the Allied advance but here he neutered a strong unit that was in a great position to serve as a roadblock.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Of course, and that goes for us all. When going back over a long PBM the analysis gets hard to figure because every "if I had done this or that better" must be accompanied by "but what if my opponent had not made his mistakes there". In a case like this if you win the gamble and rout the two armored units with a day to spare they might be trashed. If you don't attack then maybe your 35th Div can hold for a while but still gets trashed.ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
There's a lot behind that shock attack - the give and take of the game, the taking of risks, the rewards or penalties, the ebb and flow. Here he took a calculated risk that he probably couldn't afford to take and it stung him.
In recent days, John has downed a fair bit of Allied dive bombers, his fighters and/or weather have blunted my strategic bombing, and today a beat up IJA 2nd Div. shock attacked a destroyed a US Army tank battalion. All of those were good things for him.
Yesterday, my two "naked" armored units found themselves in the same hex with 35th Division. He probably knew other Allied units were inbound for the adjacent hex, but he decided to gamble that they wouldn't arrive the very next turn. He lost the gamble and trashed his division. With that many disablements, the Allied shock attack tomorrow should really pulverize 35th Div.
If you go way back through the game, you'll find many instances in which John attacked - deliberate sometimes, shock other times - when he shouldn't have. He's done it recently in coastal China; he did it early in China and Singapore.
John should be using his units to distract or slow the Allied advance but here he neutered a strong unit that was in a great position to serve as a roadblock.
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
It was an incredibly bold attack...the 35th is B Field Division...no guns bigger than 75 mm. Not a very good division, but one that has been around for the entire war.
It is almost impossible to fight Yankee tanks, if they don't want to, as they can normally exit a hex in less than one day on a main road.
Even had the tanks stayed, I suspect the result would merely have been disabled tanks with almost nothing destroyed.
It is almost impossible to fight Yankee tanks, if they don't want to, as they can normally exit a hex in less than one day on a main road.
Even had the tanks stayed, I suspect the result would merely have been disabled tanks with almost nothing destroyed.
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
11/16/44
Fancy Pants: Mostly a very good day on the ground in China but mostly a disappointing day in the air over Japan.

Fancy Pants: Mostly a very good day on the ground in China but mostly a disappointing day in the air over Japan.

- Attachments
-
- 111644FancyPants.jpg (849.3 KiB) Viewed 233 times
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
- JohnDillworth
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
So you know he is shipping troops in to Hong Kong. At least 1 division, probably more. Likely from the DEI or perhaps Singapore. You know where the bulk of his carriers are. It's a 1 or 2 day dash for a fast task force. Any thoughts to taking a swing at some fat troop transports?
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
He destroyed a division on the off chance that he could damage a couple of battalions - that's not a fair trade in any game.....
Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
I am not sure if John is this deceitful, but you can use waypoints and select Hong Kong as your final destination, and not go anywhere near there.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
I'm thinking about the comparison of what he might get for losing the division one way versus what he might get for losing the division the other way, given that he will lose the division either way.ORIGINAL: paullus99
He destroyed a division on the off chance that he could damage a couple of battalions - that's not a fair trade in any game.....
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
- JohnDillworth
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
No knock on John but that does not seem his style. More likely CR is not correct in thinking that he will defend at Canton/Hong Kong, but that the next war winning offensive will originate from there. One wonders if old intelligence shows where this division was. I expect John is scarping around that map looking for good nits and I bet there are a few in the DEI that might be better used elsewhereI am not sure if John is this deceitful, but you can use waypoints and select Hong Kong as your final destination, and not go anywhere near there.
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
- Grfin Zeppelin
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:22 pm
- Location: Germany
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Must be that bull you sold to Dan! He turned it loose at Foochow and now look what happened!ORIGINAL: Gräfin Zeppelin
Looks like China is showing some cracks.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
ORIGINAL: witpqs
I'm thinking about the comparison of what he might get for losing the division one way versus what he might get for losing the division the other way, given that he will lose the division either way.ORIGINAL: paullus99
He destroyed a division on the off chance that he could damage a couple of battalions - that's not a fair trade in any game.....
He destroyed a division on the off chance that he could damage a couple of battali
Normally, Japan is playing for time now. Time for AA and ART up to create some roadblocks, time to get some more ground troops as soon the spigots open up wide for Japan, time and diversion to keep Allies from strategic bombing Honshu, time for new planes to arrive, etc., etc.
Even a few days purchased by the 35th would have been helpful to Japan.
- Grfin Zeppelin
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:22 pm
- Location: Germany
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
John is good at fighting but not in absorbing. He tried to fight with the 35th.

- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
That puts it well. John likes to strike and hard. Especially early in the game this is usually a very effective strategy. He'll strike deep and with mighty force. He can unhinge an Allied player, especially a newb.
But he also flails ineffectively or counterproductively later in the game. The use of 35th Div., as Lowpe and Missus Zeppelin points out, is a good example. There he had a big unit, relatively fresh in a blocking position on a key road in good defensive terrain. It might have held back my two divisions for days or longer. Instead it should evaporate tomorrow.
And a week or so back, when he sent several divisions into clear coastal hexes subject to four-engine bombing: yikes! I guess the thought was "use them or lose them," but Lowpe would have thought, "Linger, loiter, wait until the bulk of the Allied army passes, and then come in behind them and disrupt LOCs, etc.
It's different strategies for different folks, but John's strongest point is his aggressiveness early in the game, especially against an opponent he can rattle.
But he also flails ineffectively or counterproductively later in the game. The use of 35th Div., as Lowpe and Missus Zeppelin points out, is a good example. There he had a big unit, relatively fresh in a blocking position on a key road in good defensive terrain. It might have held back my two divisions for days or longer. Instead it should evaporate tomorrow.
And a week or so back, when he sent several divisions into clear coastal hexes subject to four-engine bombing: yikes! I guess the thought was "use them or lose them," but Lowpe would have thought, "Linger, loiter, wait until the bulk of the Allied army passes, and then come in behind them and disrupt LOCs, etc.
It's different strategies for different folks, but John's strongest point is his aggressiveness early in the game, especially against an opponent he can rattle.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
11/17/44
Fancy Pants: Another (mostly) good day in China.
John: Two turns back he was working a small boast about knocking down Allied dive bombers; then his missed a day of turns and wrote that part of the reason was he was just not up to absorbing yet another beating. I wrote back, telling him that he's really done a fine job bearing up for so long, hoping to encourage him that he still had a role to play in this endgame - perhaps a powerful role. But there's little doubt auto vic will be merciful to John at this point. He's working hard on a new mod and should relish starting a new and fresh game. I doubt we'll play again but I'll enjoy following his next game.

Fancy Pants: Another (mostly) good day in China.
John: Two turns back he was working a small boast about knocking down Allied dive bombers; then his missed a day of turns and wrote that part of the reason was he was just not up to absorbing yet another beating. I wrote back, telling him that he's really done a fine job bearing up for so long, hoping to encourage him that he still had a role to play in this endgame - perhaps a powerful role. But there's little doubt auto vic will be merciful to John at this point. He's working hard on a new mod and should relish starting a new and fresh game. I doubt we'll play again but I'll enjoy following his next game.

- Attachments
-
- 111744FancyPants.jpg (922.59 KiB) Viewed 233 times
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.