TM, RA, and BTS Re-Write

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design, art and sound modding and the game editor for WITP Admiral's Edition.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: BTSL Complete

Post by John 3rd »

The best, at the end of the war, is still the SAM:

SAM
A7M2 11/44
A7M3 4/45
A7M3-J 5/45

SAM gets the benefit of more attention but it is still a late-war naval fighter.

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: BTSL Complete

Post by John 3rd »

CV-Variant Summary:

A6M2 to A6M5 in October 1942
JNM3a deploys April 1944 with an upgrade in October 1944
N1K2-J deploys November 1944 with an upgrade in N1K4-A in January 1945
A7M2 deploys November 1944 with upgrade in April 1945

There will be a long dry spell between A6M5 and whatever you focus research on. Look like a nightmare that could be a lot of fun for the Japanese Player.

Done. Thoughts???
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: BTSL Complete

Post by ny59giants »

A6M5 - can she get some armor??
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: BTSL Complete

Post by John 3rd »

Not in the design line Sir. Still love ya though...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: BTSL Complete

Post by Kitakami »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
OK. Here is the Real Life George Production Line w/Year and Month:

GEORGE
N1K1-J 09/43
N1K2-J 11/44
N1K5-J 10/45

Mod GEORGE Production Line
N1K1-J 9/43
N1K2-J 11/44 (CV)
N1K4-A 1/45 (CV)
N1K5-J 10/45 (CV)

The Japanese have a chance to develop an excellent CV-Based Fighter but it will take a lot of research to bring it forward as the A6M5 tries to hold the line. We'll say that instead of moving the plane models earlier, the extra research goes into creating a model strong enough for landings on the carrier.
I know this is being anal, but I would suggest that CV-capable versions have the -A suffix, while the non-CV-capable versions have the -J suffix. Historical accuracy and all that ;p
Tenno Heika Banzai!
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: BTSL Complete

Post by Kitakami »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

CV-Variant Summary:

A6M2 to A6M5 in October 1942
J2M3a deploys April 1944 with an upgrade in October 1944
N1K2-J deploys November 1944 with an upgrade in N1K4-A in January 1945
A7M2 deploys November 1944 with upgrade in April 1945

There will be a long dry spell between A6M5 and whatever you focus research on. Look like a nightmare that could be a lot of fun for the Japanese Player.

Done. Thoughts???

I like it. The N1K2-J can be advanced so that it comes in earlier by researching the N1K1-J first, and then changing the model in the research factories. The J2M line can also be researched, although the non-CV line might bear more fruit. Finally, the A7M is going to be a late-war plane, no doubt.

Of course there IS competition for research factories... the G5M/G8M heavy bombers, the B6N's & B7A's, the J7W... I like the predicament the Japanese player will be in. Will have to choose one or two, but can't choose them all if there is to be any serious advance.
Tenno Heika Banzai!
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: BTSL Complete

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: Kitakami
ORIGINAL: John 3rd
OK. Here is the Real Life George Production Line w/Year and Month:

GEORGE
N1K1-J 09/43
N1K2-J 11/44
N1K5-J 10/45

Mod GEORGE Production Line
N1K1-J 9/43
N1K2-J 11/44 (CV)
N1K4-A 1/45 (CV)
N1K5-J 10/45 (CV)

The Japanese have a chance to develop an excellent CV-Based Fighter but it will take a lot of research to bring it forward as the A6M5 tries to hold the line. We'll say that instead of moving the plane models earlier, the extra research goes into creating a model strong enough for landings on the carrier.
I know this is being anal, but I would suggest that CV-capable versions have the -A suffix, while the non-CV-capable versions have the -J suffix. Historical accuracy and all that ;p

Great comment. Will implement that thought.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: BTSL Complete

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: Kitakami
ORIGINAL: John 3rd

CV-Variant Summary:

A6M2 to A6M5 in October 1942
J2M3a deploys April 1944 with an upgrade in October 1944
N1K2-J deploys November 1944 with an upgrade in N1K4-A in January 1945
A7M2 deploys November 1944 with upgrade in April 1945

There will be a long dry spell between A6M5 and whatever you focus research on. Look like a nightmare that could be a lot of fun for the Japanese Player.

Done. Thoughts???

I like it. The N1K2-J can be advanced so that it comes in earlier by researching the N1K1-J first, and then changing the model in the research factories. The J2M line can also be researched, although the non-CV line might bear more fruit. Finally, the A7M is going to be a late-war plane, no doubt.

Of course there IS competition for research factories... the G5M/G8M heavy bombers, the B6N's & B7A's, the J7W... I like the predicament the Japanese player will be in. Will have to choose one or two, but can't choose them all if there is to be any serious advance.

There are BUCKETS of choices and that is something I love to add into the Mods. I do believe that this plan works. Does anyone else have comments?
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Aircraft Pathways

Post by John 3rd »

Have sent the files over to Michael to look at. NOTHING has been changed yet. Want him to take a look and then I'll change all the material we've talked about and then a release for people to take a look at prior to calling them finished.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: RA 7.9

Post by BillBrown »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

From the Sub Thread:
ORIGINAL: BillBrown

So the USN get three that can resize and the IJN gets all of theirs?

No. You inferred. ALL pre-war US CV/CVL ships can: Lex, Sara, King's Mountain, Ely, Langley, Yorktown, Enterprise, Hornet, and Wasp. Make sense? The others come in and do their thing as per normal.

This still has not been done yet. Any chance it could get done this time?
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: RA 7.9

Post by John 3rd »

Bill: I have tried several times. Need some help from anyone on fixing this.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: RA 7.9

Post by John 3rd »

Just got the plane upgrade paths straightened out.

Changed some of the production and research numbers better reflecting what we have been talking about.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: RA 7.9

Post by BillBrown »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Bill: I have tried several times. Need some help from anyone on fixing this.

It is very easy to do, put a date of 4112 in the resize 1 box and an appropriate size,
24 for fighters, 18 for DBs and 12 for TBs.

I can do it in a few hours if you will send me the files.

My email if you want is Adm.Bill.Brown( at ) gmail (dot) com

Here is a picture

Image
Attachments
C71F46DD59..C723632F.jpg
C71F46DD59..C723632F.jpg (398.87 KiB) Viewed 241 times
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: RA 7.9

Post by John 3rd »

I have taken that out of the Japanese groups but could easily put it in with the Allies. Think I was confused by what you were asking! Feel a bit like a dolt at the moment now that you posted the screenshot.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Lecivius
Posts: 4845
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Denver

RE: RA 7.9

Post by Lecivius »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
Feel a bit like a dolt at the moment


Image
Attachments
morning.jpg
morning.jpg (8.76 KiB) Viewed 242 times
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: RA 7.9

Post by John 3rd »

Thanks for the SUPPORT Lecivius!

NOT!!!

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: RA 7.9

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

From the Sub Thread:
ORIGINAL: BillBrown

So the USN get three that can resize and the IJN gets all of theirs?

No. You inferred. ALL pre-war US CV/CVL ships can: Lex, Sara, King's Mountain, Ely, Langley, Yorktown, Enterprise, Hornet, and Wasp. Make sense? The others come in and do their thing as per normal.

This still has not been done yet. Any chance it could get done this time?

DONE. This time FOR CERTAIN! All US Pre-War CVs and both CLV have this added to their squadrons.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

BTS--BTSL 4.3

Post by John 3rd »

New files loaded and on the website for both Mods.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3

Post by ny59giants »

ETA on updated ART files??
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3

Post by John 3rd »

Will work on that today!
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design and Modding”