Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

no problem.
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. Post Land Movement. USSR. Northern Front.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSR..rnFront.jpg
02ALUSSR..rnFront.jpg (716.99 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. Post Land Movement. USSR. Central/Moscow Front.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSR..alFront.jpg
02ALUSSR..alFront.jpg (1.13 MiB) Viewed 216 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. Post Land Movement. USSR. Southern Front (Georgia & Caucuses).

Looking desperate ...

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSR..Cacuases.jpg
02ALUSSR..Cacuases.jpg (809.94 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. USSR. Land Combat. Luftwaffe Ground Support?

Desperate times call for desperate actions. In this case Timoshenko commits his HQ and all reserve troops tied to HQ to a desperate attack to attempt to save the situation in Georgia and the Caucuses.

Do you wish to fly ground support?

Also, do want the attack be an assault or a blitz?

Image
Attachments
02ALLCL..Question.jpg
02ALLCL..Question.jpg (580.38 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. USSR. Land Combat. Luftwaffe Ground Support?

Desperate times call for desperate actions. In this case Timoshenko commits his HQ and all reserve troops tied to HQ to a desperate attack to attempt to save the situation in Georgia and the Caucuses.

Do you wish to fly ground support?

Also, do want the attack be an assault or a blitz?

Yes fly the f-b as a bomber and support the defenders. Make it a blitz.
Pat
User avatar
Zecke
Posts: 1329
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Hitoeton

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by Zecke »

WOW.WOW..WOWWWWW¡..almost..all objetives done...pleasure of AARs
Epsilon Eridani


User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: Zecke

WOW.WOW..WOWWWWW¡..almost..all objetives done...pleasure of AARs
Thanks for following! Now for resolution of the Soviet desperate and critical land combat. [:(]
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa
Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. USSR. Land Combat. Luftwaffe Ground Support?

Desperate times call for desperate actions. In this case Timoshenko commits his HQ and all reserve troops tied to HQ to a desperate attack to attempt to save the situation in Georgia and the Caucuses.

Do you wish to fly ground support?

Also, do want the attack be an assault or a blitz?

Yes fly the f-b as a bomber and support the defenders. Make it a blitz.
A bloodless result ... Timoshenko chooses not to advance.


Image
Attachments
02ALUSSRLC.jpg
02ALUSSRLC.jpg (874.8 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. US HQ Reorg.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSHQReorg.jpg
02ALUSHQReorg.jpg (476.21 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. CW Naval Reorg.

Image
Attachments
02ALCWNavalReorg.jpg
02ALCWNavalReorg.jpg (213.5 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Axis #3. Weather.

Nice weather for Pat to continue beating up on the allies. [:)]

Image
Attachments
03AXWeather.jpg
03AXWeather.jpg (659.68 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

MA43 i3:
Axis Actions: GE land, JP combine, IT combine
Italy moves a BB to the 0-box of the E. Med.
JP flies a NAV to the China Sea (3-box) and 2x FIG and NAV to the Bismark Sea (4-box).
The Japanese move majority of the fleet in Truk to the Mariannas
Truk subs are scattered across 4 zones, but ordered to avoid all combat during this impulse.

Here are the possible combats. Many I am not initiating as shown in image below. One search result shown (Arabian Sea - no contact).

Image
Attachments
MJ43i3NavalCombat.jpg
MJ43i3NavalCombat.jpg (730.88 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

In the E. Med, the allies find on rolls of 8/2. Surprise will depend on box taken. I expect you will likely avoid combat here.

Image
Attachments
MJ43i3NC..Options.jpg
MJ43i3NC..Options.jpg (651.58 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

You have potential reactions in the Bismarck Sea as shown below.

Image
Attachments
MJ43i3NC..Options.jpg
MJ43i3NC..Options.jpg (325.59 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

You also have potential reactions in the Mariannas as shown.

Image
Attachments
MJ43i3NC..Options.jpg
MJ43i3NC..Options.jpg (518.62 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

1. East Med. Pick 0-box. Use 4 SP's to avoid combat.

2. Bismarck Sea. US P-40c Tomahawk on Papua [126,177] and CW Beafout NAV react to the 2-box.

3. The Marianas. No reactions.
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

MA43 i3 Naval Combat:
Bismarck Sea search rolls of 6/10 result in no contact.
In the Marinanna there is contact on rolls of 2/7. I really debated between naval air and making it a surface. Decided on the naval air, then later realized it was raining, halving the A-S factors results. May have changed my mind, but to late now the bombers are flying.
I am only engaging the 3-box. You need to decide how to fly your CVP as fighters or bombers. My decisions made (grayed range units are flying as bombers).

Image
Attachments
MJ43i3NC..options.jpg
MJ43i3NC..options.jpg (1.63 MiB) Viewed 216 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Fighters: SBD-5 (Saratoga), F6F-3 (Essex), SBD (Bunker Hill)

Bombers: TBF-4 (Yorktown II), SBD-3 (Essex)
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Ok, I used 4 SP to move A-A up 1 for me and down 1 for you. First A-A roll is 15, you can choose to abort front fighter or bomber? Do you have directions for future results?

Image
Attachments
MJ43i3NC..combata.jpg
MJ43i3NC..combata.jpg (1.76 MiB) Viewed 216 times
Pat
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”