8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

Stelteck
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 5:07 pm

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by Stelteck »

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

In case readers were wondering, this game is no +1 bonus and mild blizzard.

Yes, a very difficult setting for the soviet team. Typically the +1 bonus would have helped you a lot around moscow right now.
Brakes are for cowards !!
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by Telemecus »

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

In case readers were wondering, this game is no +1 bonus and mild blizzard.

Is that not full blizzard? The sign up thread said mild blizzard but when the Soviet team set up the file and sent it to us it had reduced blizzard crossed out! (See our AAR comments on that!)
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4855
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by M60A3TTS »

ORIGINAL: Telemecus

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

In case readers were wondering, this game is no +1 bonus and mild blizzard.

Is that not full blizzard? The sign up thread said mild blizzard but when the Soviet team set up the file and sent it to us it had reduced blizzard crossed out!

Actually you may be right. I think now it is full with the X in the reduced blizzard box.
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by Telemecus »

ORIGINAL: Telemecus, OKH - 8 player multiplayer Axis thread post 23
inspite of what the signup thread said it is full blizzard. (Our agents believe Soviet agents interfered with the Geneva oversight committee on that one.)
[:D]
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by Telemecus »

Axis AAR is now bang up to date with lots of extra detail! As some soviet players may not have had a chance to see it before they log in let us say you can continue to visit for a couple more days. Please do post your comments and reactions there as I am very interested!
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4855
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by M60A3TTS »

One admin note, the Soviet team has lost EvK again due to RL issues and with Sardaukar still out we are back to three active Soviet players.
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by Telemecus »

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

One admin note, the Soviet team has lost EvK again due to RL issues and with Sardaukar still out we are back to three active Soviet players.

Hope the RL issue is a good one rather than bad one. Did not know Sardaukar is out, I hope similarly for good reasons rather than bad ones. I have been saving up my best SS Fremen warriors jokes so they will be there when returns.

EDIT: In terms of AAR we will hold it open until they do.
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4855
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by M60A3TTS »

Here is a good screenshot of why Soviet players should not ever spend APs on air defense units. Several versions ago, the German AA was buffed significantly and Soviet AA just nerfed to a severe degree.

Image
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by Telemecus »

American early war planning consisted of lots of Anti-"X" weapons. By the end of the war they concluded the "best way to stop a tank was with another tank", and the "best way to stop an aircraft was with another aircraft."
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4855
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by M60A3TTS »

Turn 14 in dropbox.
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4855
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by M60A3TTS »

The Soviet side has an unsolicited inquiry about joining the cause. Since we're short a player for an undetermined period of time, that individual will be coming on board if they think it is worth their time.

More to come...
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by Telemecus »

Spotted by aerial photographic reconnaissance this morning

Image
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
Well you fly U-2s so your input is already discredited. [:D]
Sorry Dinglir.

I think an explanation is in order!
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
The Soviet side has an unsolicited inquiry about joining the cause. Since we're short a player for an undetermined period of time, that individual will be coming on board if they think it is worth their time.

Great news - if it works out be sure to introduce them on the thread to us!
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4855
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by M60A3TTS »

ORIGINAL: Telemecus

Spotted by aerial photographic reconnaissance this morning

Image
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
Well you fly U-2s so your input is already discredited. [:D]
Sorry Dinglir.

I think an explanation is in order!
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
The Soviet side has an unsolicited inquiry about joining the cause. Since we're short a player for an undetermined period of time, that individual will be coming on board if they think it is worth their time.

Great news - if it works out be sure to introduce them on the thread to us!

The explanation should be self evident. The former management actually spent admin points to build the damn things and now I want you to waste bombers getting rid of them for me.

And the possible new player received a complete and unvarnished briefing. He indicated that he wasn't into lost causes.

And now on with the show.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

I am with Dinglir here. I love U2s. Maybe they take away space in the lategame better used by IL 2s, but your best friends are the ones that help you during the critical times, aren't they?
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by Telemecus »

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist
I am with Dinglir here. I love U2s.

Unfortunately two U2-VS factories were evacuated to Dubna - right in to the clutches of advancing Axis forces. I am sure when STAVKA faces the stern faces of EwaldvonKleist and Dinglir this will be explained as a "fat finger" mistake.
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

A few centuries ago, starvation was common in tsarist russia.
Now people have "fat fingers". Communism can't be so bad.
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4855
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by M60A3TTS »

ORIGINAL: Telemecus
ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist
I am with Dinglir here. I love U2s.

Unfortunately two U2-VS factories were evacuated to Dubna - right in to the clutches of advancing Axis forces. I am sure when STAVKA faces the stern faces of EwaldvonKleist and Dinglir this will be explained as a "fat finger" mistake.

No, it wasn't a fat finger. I only did two because I didn't have enough railcap left. I'll send you the rest later.
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by Telemecus »

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
No, it wasn't a fat finger. I only did two because I didn't have enough railcap left. I'll send you the rest later.

Moscow is a good choice to evacuate them to!
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by Telemecus »

Turn 14 in dropbox for the Soviet team!
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4855
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: 8 player multiplayer - THREAD FOR BOTH SIDES

Post by M60A3TTS »

ok, Soviet players should consider the Axis thread closed then.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”